0.903
IF
1.06
CiteScore
0.510
SJR
1.062
SNIP
Special issue paper
 
 

Formation of Language Identities in a Bilingual Teaching Intervention on Fractions

 
1
TU Dortmund University, Germany
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(7b):4211–4236
Publish date: 2017-06-21
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Students’ identities are connected to their productive participation in the mathematics classroom. A bilingual Turkish-German teaching intervention intended to foster the students’ conceptual understanding of fractions has to account for the students’ identities, since the students’ identities within the intervention influence how the students utilize the learning opportunities. To account for the dynamic and interactive nature of identities, positioning theory was applied to reconstruct the students’ identities as multilingual mathematics learners in four teaching intervention groups with four different teachers. In each group, students developed different identities as multilingual mathematics learners, ranging from “student in need of help” to “student responsible for mathematics.” These identities were differently affected by the Turkish language. The analysis indicates that Turkish becomes a resource in the mathematical conversations when the students collaborate towards a consensual solution and are made responsible for each other’s understanding. As a consequence, for developing teaching interventions aiming at building on students’ multilingual resources for participating in mathematical discourses, the ways in which students can develop identities must be taken into account in order to enhance productive engagement.
 
REFERENCES (40):
1. Auer, P. (2011). Code-switching/mixing. In R. Wodak, B. Johnstone, & P. E. Kerswill (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 460–478). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
2. Baecco, J.-C., Byram, M., Cavalli, M., Coste, D., Egli Cuenat, M., Goullier, F., & Panthier, J. (2010). Guide for the development and implementation of curricula for plurilingual and intercultural education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/lang. [Retrieved January, 4, 2014].
3. Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She‘s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one”: Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74.
4. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585–614. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407.
5. Civil, M., & Planas, N. (2004). Participation in the mathematics classroom: does every student have a voice? For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(1), 8–14.
6. Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.
7. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.
8. Domínguez, H. (2011). Using what matters to students in bilingual mathematics problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 305–328.
9. Empson, S. B. (2003). Low-Performing Students and Teaching Fractions for Understanding: An Interactional Analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(4), 305–343. http://doi.org/10.2307/30034786.
10. García, O. (2009). Bilingual Education in the 21st Century. A Global Perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
11. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method (3rd ed., 2011). New York: Routledge.
12. Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
13. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Authoritative, accountable positioning and connected, general knowing: Progressive themes in understanding transfer. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 537–547.
14. Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In Nicol, J. (Ed.). One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing (pp. 1-22). Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Grotjahn, R., Klein-Braley, C., & Raatz, U. (2002). C-test: an over-view. In J. A. Coleman, R. Grotjahn, & U. Raatz (Eds.), University language testing and the C-test (pp. 93-114). Bochum, Germany: Finkenstaedt.
16. Hand, V. (2012). Seeing culture and power in mathematical learning: toward a model of equitable instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1/2), 233–247. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9387-9.
17. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Wagner, D., Johnson, K. R., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185–204. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5.
18. Kuzu, T. (2014). Aufbau inhaltlicher Vorstellungen von Brüchen mit Erstsprache Türkisch. Designexperimente in Klasse 7 (Unpublished Master-Thesis, supervised by S. Prediger). Dortmund: TU Dortmund University.
19. Lange, T. (2016). Futures at stake: children’s identity work in the force field of social valorization of school mathematics. In P. Ernest, B. Sriraman, N. Ernest (Eds.), Critical Mathematics Education. Theory, Praxis and Reality (pp. 319-340). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
20. van Langenhove, L. & Harré (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning Theory. Moral Contexts of Intentional Action (pp. 14-31). Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
21. Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 365–380). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13.
22. Meyer, M., & Prediger, S. (2011). The use of first language Turkish as a Resource - a German Case Study. In M. Setati, T. Nkambule, & L. Goosen (Eds.), Proceedings of ICMI Study 21 conference: Mathematics and Language Diversity (pp. 225-234). São Paulo: ICMI.
23. Meyer, M., Prediger, S., César, M., & Norén, E. (2016). Making Use of Multiple (Non-shared) First Languages: State of and Need for Research and Development in the European Language Context. In R. Barwell, P. Clarkson, A. Halai, et al. (Eds.), Mathematics Education and Language Diversity. ICMI Study 21 (pp. 47-66). Cham: Springer.
24. Moghaddam, F. M. (1999). Reflexive positioning: Culture and private discourse. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning Theory Moral Contexts of Intentional Action (pp. 74–86). Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Moschkovich, J. N. (2015). Academic literacy in mathematics for English Learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.005.
26. Norén, E. (2008). Bilingual students' mother tongue: a resource for teaching and learning matematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 13(4), 29–50.
27. Norén, E. (2015). Agency and positioning in a multilingual mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 167–184. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9603-5.
28. Planas, N. (2011). Language identities in students’ writings about group work in their mathematics classroom. Language and Education, 25(2), 129–146.
29. Planas, N., & Gorgorió, N. (2004). Are different students expected to learn norms differently in the mathematics classroom? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 19–40.
30. Planas, N., & Setati, M. (2009). Bilingual students using their languages in the learning of mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(3), 36–59.
31. Prediger, S., & Wessel, L. (2013). Fostering German-language learners’ constructions of meanings for fractions—design and effects of a language- and mathematics-integrated intervention. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(3), 435–456.
32. Prediger, S., Clarkson, P., & Bose, A. (2016). Purposefully Relating Multilingual Registers:
Building Theory and Teaching Strategies for Bilingual
Learners Based on an Integration of Three Traditions. In R. Barwell, P. Clarkson, A. Halai, M. Kazima, J. Moschkovich, N. Planas, et al. (Eds.), Mathematics Education and Language Diversity. The 21st ICMI-Study (pp. 193–216). Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
33. Reeves, J. (2009). Teacher investment in learner identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 34–41. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.06.003.
34. Schüler-Meyer, A., Prediger, S., Kuzu, T., Wessel, L., & Redder, A. (2017). Is formal language proficiency in the home language required for profiting from a bilingual teaching intervention in mathematics? A mixed methods study on fostering multilingual students’ conceptual understanding. Submitted manuscript.
35. Setati, M. (2008). Access to mathematics versus access to the language of power: the struggle in multilingual mathematics classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 28(1), 103–116.
36. Setati, M., Molefe, T., & Langa, M. (2008). Using language as a transparent resource in the teaching and learning of mathematics in a Grade 11 multilingual classroom. Pythagoras, 0(67), 14–25.
37. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling Identities: In Search of an Analytic Tool for Investigating Learning as a Culturally Shaped Activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004014.
38. Turner, E., Dominguez, H., Maldonado, L. & Empson, S. (2013). English learners' participation in mathematical discussion: Shifting positionings and dynamic identities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 199–234.
39. Waring, H. Z. (2011). Learner initiatives and learning opportunities in the language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(2), 201–218.
40. Yoon, B. (2008). Uninvited Guests: The Influence of Teachers' Roles and Pedagogies on the Positioning of English Language Learners in the Regular Classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 495–522. http://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316200.
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215