Market-Oriented LSP Training in Higher Education: Towards Higher Communicative Skills
 
More details
Hide details
1
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Marina V. Melnichuk   

Department of Linguistic Training, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Online publish date: 2017-08-11
Publish date: 2017-08-11
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(8):5073–5084
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In the 21st century globalization accelerates the need for English communication skills as English is recognized as a lingua franca in the business world. A high priority of university educators involved in LSP (LSP – language for special purposes) training is to equip graduates with communicative LSP skills meeting the standards of huge and increasingly competitive job market. The study addresses the issue on how to close the current gap between prospective employers’ expectations of English communication skills level and the existing LSP level of graduates. The study aims at, first, to reveal the effect of English globalization on employability from the perspective of university students; second, to identify factors leading to reticence in speaking; and third, to provide a solution to the problem of gap between graduates’ oral skills and employers’ expectations. The study uses two questionnaires as an instrument to collect data. The obtained quantitative data is used as an input for qualitative study. The study certifies that undergraduates are fully aware of the utmost importance of English language for employment. Also, the study identifies the main social and psycholinguistic reasons hindering to develop speaking skills in the university settings. Further, the research findings have been used to develop and integrate into university training curricula an intensive 3-module program meeting the real needs of students and business community. The goal of this program is to equip students with excellent English communication skills meeting the rapidly changing job market demands. The findings of the study suggest that LSP training offered at higher school should be improved to meet job market requirements. The study enabled to assess the instruction results and provide a solution to the problem of “competency gap”. It points to where the real work of closing the gap between the need for workforce skilled in English communication and actual graduates’ skill level needs to happen.
 
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Baranov, A. A., & Zhuchenko, O. A. (2015). Stressoustoichivost i samootsenka akdemicheskikh dostizhenii [Stress-resistance and self-evaluation of academic achievements]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 36(4), 16-22.
 
2.
Boguslavskii, M. V., & Neborskii, Y. V. (2016). Development of the university education in the context of globalization. International Conference “Education Environment for the Information Age” (EEIA-2016). Retrieved March 12, 2017, from doi:10.1051/shsconf/20162901011.
 
3.
Chigisheva, O. (2011) Transitions from education to work: new perspectives from Europe and beyond. Review. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(5), 712-714.
 
4.
Chigisheva, O. (2015) Transformation of Pedagogical Theory and Methodology in the Focus of Globalization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 262-267.
 
5.
Chubarova, E. V. (2016). Kommunikativnaia metodika v prepodavanii inostrannogo iazyka [The communicative approach to foreign language teaching]. Kontsept, 5, 186–188. Retrieved April 29, 2017, from http://e-koncept.ru/2016/56188....
 
6.
Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing second language speaking. London: Pearson ESL.
 
7.
Gregersen, T., & Horwitz, E. K. (2002). Language Learning and Perfectionism: Anxious and Non-anxious Language Learners’ Reactions to Their Own Oral Performance. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 562-570.
 
8.
Han, Z. H., & Peverly, S. T. (2007). Learners with Multilingual Backgrounds International Journal of Multilingualism, 4(1), 17-37.
 
9.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.), Essex, England: Longman.
 
10.
Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language Anxiety and Achievements, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112-126.
 
11.
Horwitz, E.K., & Young, D .J. (1991). Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 
12.
Jones, J. F. (2004). A Cultural Context for Language Anxiety, EA (English Australia) Journal, 21(2), 30-39.
 
13.
Khotinets, V. I., & Korobeinikova, I. P. (2016). Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy produktivnogo koping-povedeniia v problemnykh kommunikativnykh situatsiiakh [Psychological mechanisms of productive coping behavior in problematic communicative situations]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 37(4), 59-73.
 
14.
Korenev, A. A., Westbrook, C., Merry, Y., Ershova, T. A. (2016). Language Teachers’ Target Language project: Language for specific purposes of language teaching. Language Teaching, UK: Cambridge University Press, 49(1), 146-148.
 
15.
Landsman, J. (2008). Reluctant Teachers, Reluctant Learners. Educational leadership, 65(6), 62-66.
 
16.
Leonov, N. I. (2013). Psikhologicheskie osobennosti prepodavatelei vuza s raznym urovnem konfliktnosti [Psychological features of instructors with different levels of conflict]. Uralskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet, 4, 40-42.
 
17.
Liu, N., & Littlewood, W. (1997). Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? System, 25(3), 371-384.
 
18.
Melnichuk, M. V., & Osipova, V. M. (2016). Rol perevoda i perevodchika v usloviiakh globalizatsii znanii [The role of translation in the context of the globalization of knowledge]. Rossiisskii Gumanitartyi Zhurnal, 5(4), 385-393.
 
19.
Prichinin, A. E. (2012). Innovatsionnoe obrazovanie: osnovaniia printsipa “uprezhdeniia real’nosti” [Innovative education: the principle of “anticipation of reality”]. Obrazovanie i obshchestvo, 1(72), 61-68.
 
20.
Prichinin, A. E. (2014). Education environment as a source of risk. Europaische Fachhochschule, 2(1), 102-105.
 
21.
Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and Performance in Language Teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2), 101-122.
 
22.
Richardson, S. (2015). Cosmopolitan Learning for a Global Era: Higher education in an interconnected world. New York, NY: Routledge.
 
23.
Robby, S. (2010). Conquer Your Fear of Making Mistakes when Speaking English. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from http://englishharmony.com/conq....
 
24.
Solovyova, N. G. (2010). Znachenie znaniia inostrannogo iazyka kak sredstvo polucheniia vysokooplachivaemoi raboty [The Importance of Knowledge of a Foreign Language for Getting a Highly Paid Work]. Munitsipalnoe obrazovanie: innovatsii i eksperiment, 4, 74-76.
 
25.
Tanveer, M. (2007). Investigation of the factors that cause language anxiety for ESL/LSP learners in learning speaking skills and the influence it casts on communication in the target language (Master’s thesis). University of Glasgow, England. Retrieved April 14, 2017, from http://www.asian-LSP-journal.c....
 
26.
Tsiplakides, I., & Keramida, A. (2010). Promoting positive attitudes in ESL/LSP classes. The Internet TESL Journal, XVI (1). Retrieved May 14, 2017, from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/T....
 
27.
Van Worde, R. (2003). Students’ perspectives on foreign language anxiety. Inquiry, 8(1), 1-16.
 
28.
Vozdvizhenskaia, A. (2016). Znanie inostrannogo iazyka uvelichivaet zarplatu rossiian v poltora raza [Knowledge of a foreign language increases the salaries of Russians by one and a half times]. Rossiiskaia gazeta-Federalnyi vypusk, 6940(72).
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215