A Comparison of Probabilistic Reasoning in Psychology Undergraduates in Italy and Spain: Seeking Cross-national Evidence
More details
Hide details
Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy - Faculty of Humanistic Studies, University of Cagliari, ITALY
Department of Social and Quantitative Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, SPAIN
Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, ITALY
Mirian Agus   

University of Cagliari - Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy - Faculty of Humanistic Studies
Online publish date: 2019-04-23
Publish date: 2019-04-23
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(10):em1752
A cross-national comparison between Italy and Spain was conducted on probabilistic reasoning performance presented in verbal-numerical and graphical-pictorial formats. This study investigated the similarities and differences in Psychology undergraduates in these two countries (Italy n=290; Spain n=130) and attempted to identify aspects that might enhance the probability of a student belonging to one country. The findings underscored that Spanish students had higher levels of visuospatial abilities, more positive attitudes toward statistics, lower statistical anxiety, and higher confidence in the correctness of their responses. Additionally, they gave a higher number of correct responses to problems presented in a verbal-numerical format. These data suggest interesting insights and highlight the interactions among multiple layers of variables at the collective, contextual, and individual levels.
Agasisti, T., & Cordero-Ferrera, J. M. (2013). Educational disparities across regions: A multilevel analysis for Italy and Spain. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(6), 1079–1102.
Agasisti, T., & Pérez-Esparrells, C. (2010). Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: the case of Italian and Spanish state universities. Higher Education, 59(1), 85–103.
Agus, M., Penna, M. P., Peró-Cebollero, M., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2016). Assessing Probabilistic Reasoning in Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Formats: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Instrument. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(8), 2013–2038.
Agus, M., Penna, M. P., Peró-Cebollero, M., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Pessa, E. (2016). Investigating the probabilistic reasoning in verbal–numerical and graphical–pictorial formats in relation to cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions: The proposal of a model. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 44–53.
Agus, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Penna, M. P., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2015a). Comparing Psychology Undergraduates’ Performance in Probabilistic Reasoning under Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Problem Presentation Format: What is the Role of Individual and Contextual Dimensions? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 735–750.
Agus, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Penna, M. P., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2015b). Towards the development of problems comparing verbal-numerical and graphical formats in statistical reasoning. Quality and Quantity, 49(2), 691–709.
Azzolini, D., & Vergolini, L. (2014). Tracking, inequality and education policy. Looking for a recipe for the Italian case. Scuola democratica, 2, 1–11.
Ballarino, G., & Panichella, N. (2016). Social stratification, secondary school tracking and university enrolment in Italy. Contemporary Social Science, 11(2–3), 169–182.
Baloglu, M. (2003). Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 855–865.
Binder, K., Krauss, S., & Bruckmaier, G. (2015). Effects of visualizing statistical information - an empirical study on tree diagrams and 2 x 2 tables. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9.
Bond, M. E., Perkins, S. N., & Ramirez, C. (2012). Students’ perceptions of statistics: an exploration of attitudes, conceptualizations, and content knowledge of statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 6–25.
Boonen, A. J. H. H., Van Wesel, F., Jolles, J., & Van der Schoot, M. (2014). The role of visual representation type, spatial ability, and reading comprehension in word problem solving: An item-level analysis in elementary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 15–26.
Brase, G. L. (2009). Pictorial representations in statistical reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 369–381.
Brase, G. L., & Hill, W. T. (2015). Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 340.
Calet, N., & Dumitrache, C. G. (2016). Características de los Estudiantes de Grado de las áreas Ciencias Sociales y Salud: autoconcepto, motivación y estrategias de aprendizaje. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 14(2), 245.
Causa, O., & Chapuis, C. (2010). Equity in Student Achievement Across OECD Countries An Investigation of the Role of Policies. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 5(1), 1–50.
Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2009a). Assessing statistics attitudes among college students: Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Survey of Attitudes toward Statistics (SATS). Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 309–313.
Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2009b). Un modello sul rendimento nelle materie quantitative degli studenti di psicologia. Giornale Italiano Di Psicologia, 36(1), 161–184.
Chiesi, F., Primi, C., & Carmona, J. (2011). Measuring Statistics Anxiety. Cross-Country Validity of the Statistical Anxiety Scale (SAS). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(6), 559–569.
Christensen, R. (1997). Log-linear models and logistic regression. Springer Verlag.
de Hevia, M. D., Vallar, G., & Girelli, L. (2008). Visualizing numbers in the mind’s eye: the role of visuo-spatial processes in numerical abilities. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(8), 1361–72.
Demir, I., Kiliç, S., & Ünal, H. (2010). Effects of students’ and schools’ characteristics on mathematics achievement: Findings from PISA 2006. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 3099–3103).
Feeney, A., Adams, J., Webber, L., & Ewbank, M. (2004). Individual differences in graphical reasoning. In A. F. Blackwell, K. Marriott, & A. Shimojima (Eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Vol. 2980, pp. 271–285). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Ferrera Cordero, J. M., Cebada Crespo, E., Chaparro Pedraja, F., & Gonzàlez, D. (2011). Exploring educational efficiency divergences across Spanish regions in PISA 2006. Revista de Economia Aplicada, 19(57), 117–145.
Finney, S. J., & Schraw, G. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 161–186.
Fonteyne, L., De Fruyt, F., Dewulf, N., Duyck, W., Erauw, K., Goeminne, K., … others. (2015). Basic mathematics test predicts statistics achievement and overall first year academic success. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(1), 95–118.
Fuchs, T., & Wößmann, L. (2007). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Empirical Economics, 32(2–3), 433–464.
Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25.
Gal, I. (2005). Towards “probability literacy” for all citizens: Building blocks and instructional dilemmas. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring Probability in School (pp. 39–63). Springer.
Gal, I., Ginsburg, L., & Schau, C. (1997). Monitoring attitudes and beliefs in statistics education. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 37–51). IOS Press.
Gal, I., & Ograjenšek, I. (2017). Official Statistics and Statistics Education: Bridging the Gap. Journal of Official Statistics, 33(1), 79–100.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic books.
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. New York: Springer Verlag.
Giordano, B., & Roller, E. (2003). A Comparison of City Region Dynamics in the UK, Spain and Italy: More Similarities than Differences? Regional Studies, 37(9), 911–927.
Guàrdia-Olmos, J., Freixa, M., Peró, M., Turbany, J., Cosculluela, A., Barrios, M., & Rifà, X. (2006). Factors Related to the Academic Performance of Students in the Statistics Course in Psychology. Quality & Quantity, 40(4), 661–674.
Hamilton, L. S. (2009). Using PISA Data to Measure School and System Characteristics and Their Relationships with Student Performance in Science. Retrieved from
Heckhausen, H., & Leppmann, P. K. (1991). Motivation and action. Springer-Verlag Publishing.
Herrera, A.-N., & Gómez, J. (2008). Influence of equal or unequal comparison group sample sizes on the detection of differential item functioning using the Mantel–Haenszel and logistic regression techniques. Quality & Quantity, 42(6), 739–755.
Jackson, S., Kleitman, S., Howie, P., & Stankov, L. (2016). Cognitive abilities, monitoring confidence, and control thresholds. Explain individual differences in heuristics and biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
Jones, G. (2005). Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning. New York: Springer.
Kastberg, D., Ying Chan, J., & Murray, G. (2016). Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Science, Reading, and Mathematics Literacy in an International Context-First Look at PISA 2015.
Lai, K., Cabrera, J., Vitale, J. M., Madhok, J., Tinker, R., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Measuring Graph Comprehension, Critique, and Construction in Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–17.
Lalonde, R. N., & Gardner, R. C. (1993). Statistics as a second language? A model for predicting performance in psychology students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25(1), 108–125.
López-Justicia, M. D., Hernández, C. M., Fernández Jiménez, C., Polo Sánchez, T., & López Chacón, H. (2008). Características formativas y socioafectivas del alumnado de nuevo ingreso en la Universidad. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Psicoeducativa, 14(6 (1)), 95–116.
Macher, D., Paechter, M., Papousek, I., Ruggeri, K., Freudenthaler, H. H., & Arendasy, M. (2013). Statistics anxiety, state anxiety during an examination, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 535–549.
Martins, L., & Veiga, P. (2010). Do inequalities in parents’ education play an important role in PISA students’ mathematics achievement test score disparities? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 1016–1033.
Moro, R., Bodanza, G. A., & Freidin, E. (2011). Sets or frequencies? How to help people solve conditional probability problems. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(7), 843–857.
Morsanyi, K., Primi, C., Chiesi, F., & Handley, S. (2009). The effects and side-effects of statistics education: Psychology students’ (mis-) conceptions of probability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(3), 210–220.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1995). Statistics test anxiety and female students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(3), 413–418.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Seaman, M. A. (1995). The effect of time constraints and statistics test anxiety on test performance in a statistics course. The Journal of Experimental Education, 63(2), 115–124.
Oppedisano, V., & Turati, G. (2015). What are the causes of educational inequality and of its evolution over time in Europe? Evidence from PISA. Education Economics, 23(1), 3–24.
Penna, M. P., Agus, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Pessa, E. (2014). The use of imagery in statistical reasoning by university undergraduate students: a preliminary study. Quality and Quantity, 48(1), 173–187.
Primi, C., & Chiesi, F. (2016). Statistics anxiety: A mediator in learning probability. In 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 1–7). Hamburg, July 24-31, 2016.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353.
Schau, C., Stevens, J., Dauphinee, T. L., & Del Vecchio, A. (1995). The Development and Validation of the Survey of Attitudes toward Statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 868–875.
Spain: Overview - Eurydice. (2017). Retrieved on July 20, 2017, from
Stankov, L. (2013). Noncognitive predictors of intelligence and academic achievement: An important role of confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 727–732.
Stankov, L., Morony, S., & Lee, Y. P. (2014). Confidence: the best non-cognitive predictor of academic achievement? Educational Psychology, 34(1), 9–28.
Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1981). PMA: abilità mentali primarie: manuale di istruzioni - Batteria fattoriale delle abilità mentali primarie. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1987). TEA - tests de aptitudes escolares : manual (Vol. 5a). Madrid: Tea.
Triventi, M., & Trivellato, P. (2009). Participation, performance and inequality in Italian higher education in the 20th century : Evidence from the Italian Longitudinal Household Survey. Higher Education, 57(6), 681–702.
van Ginkel, G., Oolbekkink, H., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2016). Adapting mentoring to individual differences in novice teacher learning: the mentor’s viewpoint. Teachers and Teaching, 22(2), 198–218.
Vigil-Colet, A., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Condon, L. (2008). Development and validation of the statistical anxiety scale. Psicothema, 20(1), 174–180.
Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 250–71.
Williams, A. (2014). An Exploration of Preference for Numerical Information in Relation to Math Self-Concept and Statistics Anxiety in a Graduate Statistics Course. Journal of Statistics Education, 22(1).
Wu, C. M., Meder, B., Filimon, F., & Nelson, J. D. (2017). Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(8), 1274-1297.
Yamagishi, K. (2003). Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: Frequency or nested sets? Experimental Psychology, 50(2), 97–106.