**EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education**is peer-reviewed and published 12 times in a year.

Research paper

1 | Mongolian Institute for Educational Research, MONGOLIA |

EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(3):699–708

Online publish date: 2017-11-26

Publish date: 2017-11-26

KEYWORDS:

ABSTRACT:

This study aimed to determine and validate a version of the MTPC with 4 belief, 4 knowledge, 4 practice, and 3 attitude items. The sample size of the study was 218 participants. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze research data. The results of the study revealed that after deleting 3 items of attitude, a 3-factor model was validated and well fit the research data. Therefore, the model best fits the Mongolian context in comparison to other models.

REFERENCES (47):

1. | AAMT (2006). Standards for Excellence in Teaching Mathematics in Australian Schools. Retrieved from http://www.aamt.edu.au/Better-teaching/Standards. |

2. | Abdul, M.A., Darmawan, I.G.N., & Lynch, P. (2013). A confirmatory factor analysis of attitudes toward mathematics inventory (ATMI). The Mathematics Educator, 15(1), 121-135. |

3. | An, S., Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school mathematics teachers in China and the U.S. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 145-172. doi:10.1023/B:JMTE.0000021943.35739.1c. |

4. | Attorps, I. (2006). Mathematics teachers´ conceptions about equations (Academic dissertation). University of Helsinki. Retrieved from http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/kay/sovel/vk/attorps/mathemat.pdf. |

5. | Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics of Teaching and Learning. (pp. 83- 104). Westport, Conn.: Ablex Publishing. |

6. | Ball, D. L. & Bass, H. (2004). Knowing mathematics for teaching. In R. Strasser, GBrandell, B. Grevholm, O. Helenius (Eds.), Educating for the future. Proceedings of an international symposium on mathematics teacher education (pp. 159-178). Sweden: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. |

7. | Ball, D. L., & Sleep, L. (2007). What is knowledge for teaching, and what are features of tasks that can be used to develop MKT? Paper presented at the Center for Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics (CPTM) pre-session of the annual meeting of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE), Irvine. |

8. | Ball, D. L. (2009). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: knowing mathematics for teaching to learners’ mathematical futures. Paper presented at the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Annual Meeting, Washington D.C. |

9. | Begz, N. (2017). New paradigm in educology of Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar: SOYOMBO printing. |

10. | Beswick, K. (2005). The beliefs/practice connection in broadly defined contexts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 39–68. doi:10.1007/BF03217415. |

11. | Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians’ mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 127–147. doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9333-2. |

12. | Brown, C., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a Mathematics Teacher. In Grouws, D. A. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 208-239). Reston: NCTM. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0554-8. |

13. | Deakin, C. R. (2008). Pedagogy for citizenship. In F. Oser & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Getting involved: Global citizenship development and sources of moral values (pp.31-55). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. |

14. | Döhrmann, M., Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2012). The conceptualisation of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. ZDM, 44(3), 325–340. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0432-z. |

15. | Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33. doi:10.1080/0260747890150102. |

16. | Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan. |

17. | Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press. |

18. | Gupta, K. (1999). A practical guide for need assessment. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons. Inc. |

19. | Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. |

20. | Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53 – 60. |

21. | Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118. |

22. | Kline, R. B. (2010). Principle and Practices of Structural Equation Modelling. New York, NY: The Guildford Press. |

23. | Koehler, M. S., & Grouws, D. A. (1992). Mathematics teaching practices and their effects. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 115-125). New York: Macmillan. |

24. | Koponen, M., Asikainen, M. A, Viholainen, A., & Hirvonen, P.A. (2017) How Education Affects Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge: Unpacking Selected Aspects of Teacher Knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(6), 1943–1980. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.01209a. |

25. | Leinhardt, G. & Smith, D. A. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 247–271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.247. |

26. | Leong, K. E. (2013). Factors that influence the understanding of good mathematics teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 309-318. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.939a. |

27. | Luvsandorj, Ts., Doyod, U., & Dalaijamts, Ts., (2003). Concepts of new development for standart and curriculum of mathematics teachers’ education. New Trends in Teacher Education Development (pp. 44-53). Ulaanbaatar: SOYOMBO printing. |

28. | Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |

29. | MECS (2016). Education Statistical Yearbook (2015 – 2016 academic year). Ulaanbaatar: Edmarket. |

30. | Munkhjargal, D., Teacher Education Reform in Mongolia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Teacher Education Reform (pp. 12 - 20). Ulaanbaatar: MNUE. |

31. | National Council of Teachers of Mathematics on Teaching Standards for School Mathematics (1991). Professional Standards. Reston, Virginia: NCTM. |

32. | OECD (2013). Supporting Teacher Competence Development for Better Learning Outcomes. Paris: OECD publications. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/school-education/teacher-cluster_en.html. |

33. | Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in- context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94. doi:10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7. |

34. | Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010) How to think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routedge. |

35. | Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Poutledge. |

36. | Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Merrill. |

37. | Siti, M. M., Effand, Z., & Norazah, M. N. (2011), Confirmatory factor analysis of the mathematics teachers’ teaching practices instrument. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12(11), 2092 – 2096. |

38. | Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4 – 14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004. |

39. | Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1 – 22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411. |

40. | Steiger, J. H. (2007), Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling, Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893 – 98. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017. |

41. | Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007), Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Allyn and Bacon. |

42. | Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan. |

43. | Turner-Bisset, R. (2001). Expert teaching: Knowledge and pedagogy to lead the profession. London: David Fulton. |

44. | Van der Sandt, S. (2007), Research framework on mathematics teacher behaviour: koehler and grouws’ framework revisited. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 343-350. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75413. |

45. | Van Zoest, L. R., Jones, G. A., & Thornton, C. A. (1994). Beliefs about mathematics teaching held by pre-service teachers involved in a first grade mentorship program. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 37–55. doi:10.1007/BF03217261. |

46. | Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concepts of competence: A conceptual clarification. Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45-66). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. |

47. | Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D., F., & Summers, G. (1977), Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models, Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84–136. doi:10.2307/270754. |