A Study on the Effects of Dual Network Embeddedness on Organizational Learning and Internationalization Performance
Jie yi Li 1  
,  
Jin xia Cao 1
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Zhejiang Normal University, China
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Jie yi Li   

School of Economics and Management Zhejiang Normal University, College of Economics and Finance City, Fujian Province, China, 362021 Quanzhou, China
Publish date: 2017-06-16
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(8):5519–5529
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Knowledge is an endless resource as well as the key source of competitive advantage for enterprises. In the era of globalization with knowledge economy and network economy, the internationalization growth of enterprises is facing new challenges. Under such situations, an enterprise has to stress on the resource integration of internal network and reduce international business risks by developing the external network relationship to enhance the internationalization performance. With on-site questionnaire distribution and collection, enterprises with export-oriented manufacturing in Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang areas are distributed 400 copies of questionnaire in this study. Total 302 valid copies are retrieved, with the retrieval rate 75.5%. The research results are summarized as below. 1. Dual network embeddedness presents significantly positive effects on organizational learning. 2. Dual network embeddedness shows remarkably positive effects on internationalization performance. 3. Organizational learning reveals notably positive effects on internationalization performance. It is expected to apply the research results to the internationalization growth or transnational business development of enterprises, to enhance the strategic performance and financial performance, and to be the reference for research on network embeddedness and organizational learning.
 
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M, & Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 979-996.
 
2.
Antonio, C., (2007), Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 585-608.
 
3.
Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., & Clarysse, B. (2010), Learning from experience and learning from others: an organizational learning model of Young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 164-182.
 
4.
Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., & Clarysse, B. (2010), Learning from experience and learning from others: how congenital and inter organizational learning substitute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 164-182.
 
5.
Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S., (1994). Marketing strategy-performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 1, 1-21.
 
6.
Chetty, S., & Holm, D. B., (2000). Internationalization of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: a network approach. International Business Review, 1, 77-93.
 
7.
Coleman, J., (1990). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
 
8.
Czinkota, M. R. (1982). Export development strategies: US promotion policy, New York, Praeger, 1982.
 
9.
Delios, A., & Beamis, P. W. (2002). Survival profitability: the roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 5, 1028-1038.
 
10.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddednes. American Journal of Sociology, 3, 481-510.
 
11.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 3, 481-510.
 
12.
Halinen, A., & Törnroos, J. Å. (1995). The Meaning of time in the study of industrial buyer- seller relationships.
 
13.
Halinen, A., (1994). Exchange relationships in professional services: a study of relationship development in the advertising sector. Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku, 393.
 
14.
Halinen, A., & Törnroos, J. Å., (1995). Business marketing: an interaction and network perspective, 1, 493-529.
 
15.
Hung, H. F., Kao, H. P., & Chu, Y. Y. (2008). An empirical study on knowledge integration, technology innovation and experimental practice. Expert Systems with Applications, 1-2, 177-186.
 
16.
Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. (1985). Marketing investments and market investments in industrial networks. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 3, 185–195.
 
17.
Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. (1988). Strategic action in industrial networks and the development towards the "single european market".
 
18.
Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. (1988). Internationalization in industrial systems- a network approach. Strategies in global competition, Croom Helm, New York, 303–321.
 
19.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalism. International Marketing Review, 4, 11-24.
 
20.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2006). Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: A note on the Uppsala internationalization process model. Management International Review, 2, 165-178.
 
21.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2003). Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1, 83-101.
 
22.
Karl, P. (1957). The Economy as Instituted Process in Trade and Market in the early Empire. The Free Press.
 
23.
Knight, G. A.,& Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 2, 124-141.
 
24.
Lane, P. J.,Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity. Academy of Management Review, 31, 833-863.
 
25.
Li, Y., Wei, Z. L., & Zhao, J., et al. (2013). Ambidextrous organizational learning, environmental munificence and new product performance: moderating effect of managerial ties in China. International Journal of Production Economic, 1, 95-105.
 
26.
Li, Y., Wei, Z. L., & Zhao. J., et al. (2013). Ambidextrous organizational learning, environmental munificence and new product performance: moderating effect of managerial ties in China. International Journal of Production Economic, 1, 95-105.
 
27.
Lin, N., Ensel & Vaughn. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 4, 393-405.
 
28.
March, G. J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 1, 71-87.
 
29.
Masaaki, K., Srini,S. S., & Preet. S. A. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: the moderating of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 1, 79-97.
 
30.
Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2011). Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 2, 235–252.
 
31.
Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (2001). A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Learning.
 
32.
Noni, I. D., & Apa, R. (2015). The moderating effect of exploitative and exploratory learning on internationalization performance relationship in SMEs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2, 96-117.
 
33.
Oviatt, B. M., & Mcdougall, P. P. (2005). The internationalization of entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 1, 2-8.
 
34.
Shaw, R. B., & Perkins, D. N. (1991). Teaching organizations to learn. Organization Development Journal, 9, 1-12.
 
35.
Sorenson, O., & Stuart T. E. (2005). The evolution of venture capital investment networks. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
 
36.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 35-67.
 
37.
Uzzi, B., (1999). Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 4, 481-505.
 
38.
Wach, K., (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation and business internationalization process: the theoretical foundations of international entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial Business & Economics Review, 2, 9-24.
 
39.
Wu, A., & Voss, H. (2015). When does absorptive capacity matter for international performance of firms? Evidence from China. International Business Review, 2, 344-351.
 
40.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G., (2002). The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research, 2, 147-150.
 
41.
Zahra, S. A., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). The effect of international venturing on firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 195-220.
 
42.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). The net-enabled business innovation cycle and a strategic entrepreneurship perspective on the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research, 147-150.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215