RESEARCH PAPER
Analysing and Improving Students’ Mathematics Skills Using ICT-Tools
 
More details
Hide details
1
Tampere University of Technology, Laboratory of Mathematics, Tampere, FINLAND
2
School of Ylöjärvi, Ylöjärvi, FINLAND
Online publish date: 2018-01-05
Publish date: 2018-01-05
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(4):1221–1227
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
In this paper the supportive actions taken at Tampere University of Technology (TUT) for the first year students in engineering mathematics are discussed. The measures include Basic Skill’s Test (BST), Mathematics Remedial Instruction (MRI), and student profiling based on students’ attitudes on learning. Specially, we describe how MRI was implemented in Math-Bridge and carried out at TUT. The effects of MRI for different learner groups using success indicators, log file analysis, and statistical methods are presented and clarified using data visualization.
 
REFERENCES (11):
1. Entwistle, N. (1986). Styles of Learning and Teaching. An Integrated Outline of Educational Psychology for students, Teachers, and Lecturers, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 293 pages.
2. Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2007). The Role of Education Quality in Economic Growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4122. Retrieved on February 2007 from http:/info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/242798/day1hanushekgrowth.pdf doi:10.1596/1813-9450-4122.
3. Huikkola, M., Silius, K., & Pohjolainen, S. (2008). Clustering and achievement of engineering students based on their attitudes, orientations, motivations and intentions. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 5(5), 342-354.
4. Math-Bridge. (2017). Math-Bridge project website. Retrieved on 30/7/2017 from http://www.mathbridge.org/.
5. Mustoe, L., & Lawson, D. (Eds.) (2002). Mathematics for the European engineer. A curriculum for the twenty first century. SEFI Mathematics Working Group. Retrieved from http://sefi.htw-aalen.de/Curriculum/sefimarch2002.pdf.
6. Nykänen, O. (2013). Datamap Visualization Technique for Interactively Visualizing Large Datasets. Academic MindTrek ‘13 Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media Tampere, Finland, October 01 - 04, 2013, pp 52. doi:10.1145/2523429.2523458.
7. Pohjolainen, S. A., Nykänen, O. A., Venho, J. S., & Kangas, J. P. (2013). Improving Engineering Students’ mathematical skills and analysing their behavior using ICT-tools. 41th SEFI Conference, 16-20 September 2013, Leuven, Belgium.
8. Pohjolainen, S., Raassina, H., Silius, K., Huikkola, M., & Turunen, E. (2006). TTY:n insinöörimatematiikan opiskelijoiden asenteet, taidot ja opetuksen kehittäminen (In Finnish),Tampere University of Technology, Institute of Mathematics, 127 pages.
9. Ramsden, P. (1984). The Context of Learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D. & Entwistle, N. (ed.) The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press, pp. 144-164.
10. Sangwin, C. J. (2010). Who uses STACK? A report on the use of the STACK CAA system. Retrieved from http://web.mat.bham.ac.uk/C.J.Sangwin/Publications/2010-3-1-STACK.pdf.
11. Yrjönsuuri, R. (2002). Opit kun haluat. Matematiikkaa ja yhteistyötä (in Finnish), Hamina, Oy Kotkan kirjapaino Ab, 177 pages.
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215