Analysis of the Learning Effectiveness of Atayal Culture CPS Spatial Concept Course on Indigenous Students
Jenyi Chao 1  
Chuan-Hsi Liu 2,  
More details
Hide details
National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, TAIWAN
National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, TAIWAN
Online publish date: 2018-03-02
Publish date: 2018-03-02
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(6):2059–2066
This study was conducted by integrating Atayal culture into CPS education strategy to develop spatial concept courses, teaching materials, and assessment tests that served to analyze the effectiveness of spatial concept learning on indigenous students after two years of course. The participants of this study were 16 5th grade students from an Atayal elementary school located in Nan’ao, Yilan County. The period of study spanned from 2015 to 2016, and was conducted by gathering data through teaching demonstrations and tests. The tests developed for this study were used as the research tool, and had been examined and pretested by 3 content specialists. The finalized tests included a total of 19 segments (59 problems) on 6 spatial concepts: “rotation”, “reflection”, “folding”, “perspective”, “stacking”, and “cubic enumeration”. The tests were conducted before and after the study and verified against sample t to examine if the indigenous students’ spatial concepts exhibited significant changes. Study results showed that with regard to the 6 different spatial concept tests, indigenous students performed significantly better in the after-tests than in the pre-tests. The integration of Atayal culture into CPS spatial concept courses was therefore determined to have significant positive impact on the spatial concepts of indigenous students.
1. Chan, M. C., & Clarke, D. (2017). Structured affordances in the use of open-ended tasks to facilitate collaborative problem solving. ZDM Mathematics Education, 1(online), 1-13.
2. Chang, H. R. (2010). Cooperative Learning Theories. Internet Sociology and Communications, 86(14). Retrieved from
3. Chao, J. Y., Chao, S. J., Yao, L.-Y., & Liu, C. H. (2016). A Case Study of Design and Usability Evaluation of the Collaborative Problem Solving Instructional Platform System. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(10), 2647-2655.
4. Chao, J. Y., Chen, J.-Y., & Chi, S.-C. (2012, Dec). Exploring the differences between learning of indigenous and Han children in the instructional approach of building blocks by hand. Advances in Education Research, 9, 332-337. NSC 100-2511-S-130-001.
5. Chao, J. Y., Liu, C. H., & Chen, J. Y. (2014). The Influence of Courses Integrating Atayal Culture and LEGO Dacta on the Programming Ability and Creativity of Aboriginal Children. Global Journal of Computers & Technology, 1(2), 34-43. 305-311.NSC100-2511-S-130-002.
6. Chao, J. Y., Yao, L. Y., Liu, C. H., & Chen, J. Y. (2015). Study on CPS spatial concept course and assessments for aboriginal children: With “rotation” and “mapping” as examples. In T. H. Meen, S. D. Prior, & A. D. K. T. Lam (Eds.). Applied system innovation (pp.163). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
7. Chao, J. Y., Yao, L. Y., Liu, C. H., & Chen, J. Y. (2016). Study on CPS spatial concept course and assessments for aboriginal children: With “rotation” and “mapping” as examples. In Meen, Prior, & Lam (Eds). Applied system innovation (pp.735-740). Taylor & Francis Group: London.
8. Chi, H. Y., & Liu, H. L. (2000). The Learning World of Atayal Children in Elementary Schools. Journal of National Hualien Teachers College, 10, 65-100.
9. Chou, Y. S., Huang, T. H., & Yu, P. T. (2015). The Influences of the Application of Animation Teaching toward Aboriginal Students’ Aesthetic Experience. Educational Technology & Learning, 3(1), 1-24.
10. Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior (2015). Statistical Bulletin, Week 7, 2015 (Summary of indigenous population by the end of 2014). Retrieved from
11. DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S., & Spector, J. M. (2017). Wikis for a Collaborative Problem-Solving (CPS) Module for Secondary School Science. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 144-155.
12. Fu, L. Y. (2004). Whose Scientific Education? A Multicultural Perspective on Elementary and Middle School Scientific Education. Courses and Teaching, 7, 91-108.
13. Ho, Y. C. (2005). Practice and Reflection of Culturally Responsive Teaching: Action Research of a Multi-Ethnic Classroom. Journal of the National Institute for Compilation and Translation, 33(4), 30-41.
14. Huang, J. J. S, Yang, S. J. H., Chiang, P. Y. F., & Tzeng, L. S. Y. (2012). Building an e-portfolio learning model: Goal orientation and metacognitive strategies. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 4(1), 16-36.
15. Karpov, Y. V., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky’s concept of mediation: Implications for instruction. American Psychologist, 53(1), 27-36.
16. Kim, H., & Song, J. (2006). The Features of peer argumentation in middle school students’ scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 211-233.
17. Lin, L. C. (1994). Interactive Learning Environments and the Learning of Scientific Knowledge. Instructional Technology & Media, 16, 3-13.
18. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
19. Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, R. J. Sternberg, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 181–248.
20. Lord, T. R. (1985a). Enhancing learning in the life sciences through spatial perception. Innovative Higher Education, 15(1), 5-16.
21. Lord, T. R. (1985b). Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 395-405.
22. McGee, M. G. (1979) Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889-918.
23. Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, C. M. Reigeluth. Ed. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.
24. Serda, G. (2012, Oct. 26). PISA will assess collaborative problem solving skills in 2015 acknowledges ATC21S program. [Web blog message]. Retrieved from
25. Tan, K. T., Liu, M. H., & Yu, M. H. (2008). Multicultural Education. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.
26. Wang, J. U., & Chen, K. H. (2016). Based on Cabri 3D and Physical Manipulatives to Study the Effect of Learning on the Spatial Rotation Concept for Second Graders. Taiwan Journal of Mathematical Education, 3(1), 19-54.
27. Weckbacher, L., & Okamoto, Y. (2014). Mental rotation ability in relation to self-perceptions of high school geometry. Learning & Individual Differences, 30, 58-63,
28. Wu, H. C. (2001). A study of the Relationship between the Performances of Spatial Ability and Learning Achievement of Development Drawing in the Mechanical Drawing of Vocational High School Student (Unpublished M.S. thesis). Dept. Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal Univ., Taipei, Taiwan.