RESEARCH PAPER
Analyzing the Growth of a Pre-Service Science Teacher Community through the Lens of Cultural Historical Activity Theory: The Case of a Three-Year Voluntary Science Teaching Program
Seyoung Hwang 1,  
Namsoo Kim 2,  
Sang-Hak Jeon 3  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
National Youth Policy Institute, Sejong, SOUTH KOREA
2
Seoul National University, Seoul, SOUTH KOREA
3
Seoul National University College of Education, Seoul, SOUTH KOREA
4
Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, Seoul, SOUTH KOREA
Online publish date: 2018-01-05
Publish date: 2018-01-05
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(4):1133–1145
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
This study examines the growth of an innovative pre-service science teachers’ (PST) community over a period of three years in a voluntary and informal setting for teaching science to high school students. The objective of this study is to understand the traits and conditions necessary for the learning and development that occurred in the PST group. We describe the growth of the PST group with a focus on the group’s endeavor to move from simple laboratory work to a more inquiry-based approach to science instruction. In doing so, we seek to articulate the growth of the group by focusing through the lens of cultural historical activity theory on how its meanings, tools, and priorities were constantly formulated and examined within the community.
 
REFERENCES (21):
1. Abrahams, I. (2009). Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science. Science Education, 31, 2335‒2353. doi:10.1080/09500690802342836.
2. Bacharach, N., Heck, T. W., & Dahlberg, K. (2010). Changing the face of student teaching through coteaching. Action in Teacher Education, 32, 3‒14. doi:10.1080/01626620.2010.10463538.
3. Britzman, P. D. (2003). Practice Makes Practice: A Critical Study of Learning to Teach. NY: SUNY Press.
4. Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among pre-service elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281‒301. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.005.
5. Eick, C., & Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers’ practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Education, 89, 470–491. doi:10.1002/sce.20036.
6. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
7. Engestrӧm, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1‒24. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002.
8. Gelfuso, A., & Dennis, D. V. (2014). Getting reflection off the page: The challenges of developing support structures for pre-service teacher reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 1‒11. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.10.012.
9. Han, G. (2010). Research on the pre-teacher’s instruction expertise formation course by social studies guidance plan through reflective mentoring. Social Studies Education, 49, 17‒38.
10. Hwang, S., Kim, N., Jeon, S., Shim, H., & Ryu, K. (2015). Dialogical action research into pre-service science teacher collaboration with a local high school: A cultural-historical activity - theoretical perspective. In Yates N. L. (Ed.), New developments in science education research. (135-150). New York, NY :NOVA.
11. Kozulin, A. (2001). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355.003.
13. Lee, S., Min, H., Won, J., & Paik, S. (2011). The change in pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31, 621‒640.
14. Murphy, C., Scantlebury, K., & Milne, C. (2015). Using Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development to propose and test an explanatory model for conceptualising coteaching in pre-service science teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 281-295. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2015.1060291.
15. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N., & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: An activity-theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 253‒282. doi:10.1002/tea.10018.
16. Roth, W-M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186‒232. doi:10.3102/0034654306298273.
17. Saka, Y., Southerland, S., & Brooks, S. (2009). Becoming a member of a school community while working toward science education reform: Teacher induction from a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) perspective. Science Education, 93, 996‒1025. doi:10.1002/sce.20342.
18. Scantlebury, K., Gallo-Fox, J., & Wassell, B. (2008). Coteaching as a model for preservice secondary science teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 967‒981. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.10.008.
19. Shim, H., Ryu, K., Jeon, S., & Hwang, S. (2015). Analyzing the pre-service teacher community's reflection on their instruction from the cultural historical activity theoretical perspective: A case of three years of biological laboratory class. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35, 523-536. doi:10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0523.
20. Shim, H., Ryu, K., Lee, E., Jeon, S., & Hwang, S. (2013). Features in pre-service teachers' reflective discussion on their practical work-based teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33, 911-931. doi:10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.911.
21. Yoon, H. (2012). Analysis of pre-service elementary teachers’ reflection on their science teaching in terms of productive reflection. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32, 703‒716. doi:10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.703.
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215