Developing a Web-based Assessment System for Evaluating Examinee’s Understanding of the Procedure of Scientific Experiments
Tzu-Hua Wang 1  
More details
Hide details
Department of Education and Learning Technology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, TAIWAN
Online publish date: 2018-02-08
Publish date: 2018-02-08
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(5):1791–1801
This research tries to use multimedia animation to design examination questions and develop a Web-based Performance Assessment system (WPA system) to evaluate examinees’ understanding of the procedure of scientific experiments. WPA system also documents and scores the process an examinee responds to multimedia animation questions, including the tracks movable objects leave on the screen, and information examinees input and whether their answers are correct. Examinees’ recorded process of the operation of each multimedia animation question can be replayed for teachers to grasp a full picture of examinees’ process of answering. WPA system can be used for improving and evaluating students’ understanding of the procedure of scientific experiments.
1. Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2011). The TriLab, a novel ICT based triple access mode laboratory education model. Computers & Education, 56, 262-274.
2. Bowman, C. D. D. (2012). Student Use of Animated Pedagogical Agents in a Middle School Science Inquiry Program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43 (3), 359-375.
3. Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrel & E.H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching (pp. 20–46). American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Washington, DC.
4. Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., & Bedgood, D. R. (2009). Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers & Education, 53, 853-865.
5. Dancy, M. H. & Beichner, R. (2006). Impact of animation on assessment of conceptual understanding in physics. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 2, 010104-1-010104-7.
6. De Grove, F., Van Looy, J., Neys, J. & Jansz, J. (2012). Playing in School or at Home? An Exploration of the Effects of Context on Educational Game Experience. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(2), 199-208.
7. Heradio R., De La Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14-38.
8. Hofstein A., & Lunetta V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.
9. Hofstein, A., Shore, R., & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory-a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 47-62.
10. Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Jagodziński, P., & Wolski, R. (2015). Assessment of Application Technology of Natural User Interfaces in the Creation of a Virtual Chemical Laboratory. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 24, 16–28. 10.1007/s10956-014-9517-5.
12. Kempa, R. F. (1986). Assessment in science. Cambridge: Cambridge science education series, Cambridge University.
13. Lunetta, V.N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and centers for contemporary teaching. In P. Fensham (Ed.). Developments and dilemmas in science education (pp 169-188). London, Falmer Press.
14. Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In N. Lederman & S. Abel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393–441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M. W., Gadegaard, H. (2016). Virtual simulations as preparation for lab exercises: Assessing learning of key laboratory skills in Microbiology and improvement of essential non-cognitive skills. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0155895.
16. Pekdag, B. (2010). Alternative Methods in Learning Chemistry: Learning with Animation, Simulation, Video and Multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 79–110.
17. Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2000). Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 521–537.
18. Stieff, M., & Wilensky, U. (2003). Connected chemistry: Incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 285–302.
19. Triona, L., & Klahr, D. (2003). Point and click or grab and heft: Comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students’ ability to design experiments. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 149–173.
20. Wang, T. H. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students’ e-Learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54, 1157-1166.
21. Wang, T. H. (2011a). Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment. Computers & Education, 57, 1801-1812.
22. Wang, T. H. (2011b). Implementation of Web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Computers & Education, 56, pp 1062-1071.
23. Wang, T. H. (2014). Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 73, 189-203.
24. Wang, T. H., Chiu, M. H., Lin, J. W., & Chou, C. C. (2013). Diagnosing students' mental models via the Web-Based Mental Models Diagnosis system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44 (2), E45-E48.
25. Wiesner, T. F., & Lan, W. (2004). Comparison of student learning in physical and simulated unit operations experiments. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 195-204.
26. Wouters, P., Paas, F. & van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2008). How to optimize learning from animated models: A review of guidelines based on cognitive load. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 645-675.
27. Wu, H. C., Yeh, T. K. & Chang, C. Y. (2010). The design of an animation-based test system in the area of Earth sciences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), E53-E57.
28. Yang, K. Y., & Heh, J. S. (2007). The impact of internet virtual physics laboratory instruction on the achievement in physics, science process skills and computer attitudes of 10th grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 451–461.
29. Zacharia, Z. C.(2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 120-132.