0.903
IF
1.06
CiteScore
0.510
SJR
1.062
SNIP
Special issue paper
 
CC-BY 4.0
 
 

Educational Status and Opinions of Voters Regarding the Social Environment and New Media Tools

Cüneyt Kurtulan 1  ,  
 
1
European University of Lefke, N. CYPRUS
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(1):183–195
Online publish date: 2017-11-02
Publish date: 2017-11-02
KEYWORDS:
This article has been presented in ICES 2017 - International Conference on Environmental Sciences & Educational Studies. This article belongs to the special issue " Interdisciplinary Research on the Environmental Education, Educational Studies in Sustainability & Instructional Technologies and Designs.
ABSTRACT:
This study was conducted to reveal the opinions of voters regarding the social environment and new media tools with respect to their educational status. In the survey, it was aimed to reveal the factors that constitute the elements of the social environment and new media tools by taking into account the educational situation of voters, which are preliminary. For this purpose, a questionnaire was applied to 440 persons and interviewed in 5 provinces of the Northern part of Cyprus, which were determined by non-probability sampling method. When the research findings were evaluated, it was determined that the graduates of secondary schools are the mostly affected group by social environment during the campaigns. In addition, it was determined that ‘new media tools mostly affected graduate/doctoral graduates while voting decision was being.
 
REFERENCES (39):
1. Akar, E. (2010). Sosyal medya pazarlaması: Sosyal web de pazarlama stratejileri. Efil Yayınevi.
2. Akkanat, S. (2015). Kurucu İktidara Dayalı Bir Demokrasinin İmkânı: Siyasal Bir Yaklaşım. Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 48(2).
3. Aziz, A. (2013) Siyasal İletişim. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
4. B Borins, S. (2011). Online Adaydan Online Başkana (Trans. Çetin, N., ed. Devran, Y.) Kampanyalarında Geleneksel Medya, İnternet ve Sosyal Medyanın Kullanımı. İstanbul: Başlık Yayınları, 85-93.
5. Bat, B. A. V. M. (2009). Siyasal Seçim Kampanyalarında Yeni İletişim Teknolojileri Ve Blog Kullanımı: 2008 Amerika Başkanlık Seçimlerine Yönelik Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. Journal Of Yaşar University, 4(16), 2745-2778.
6. Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political communication, 16(3), 209-230.
7. Burden, B. C. (2009). The dynamic effects of education on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 28(4), 540-549.
8. Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. London: Yale University Press.
9. Casper, M. (2001). A definition of “social environment”. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 465.
10. Çobanoğlu, Ş. (2007). Suskunluk sarmalı ve siyasal iletişim. Fide Yayınları.
11. Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political communication, 22(2), 147-162.
12. Dee, T. S. (2004). Are there civic returns to education? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 1697-1720.
13. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New Jersey: Wiley.
14. Ford, P. (1986). Outdoor Education: Definition and Philosophy. New Mexico: ERIC.
15. Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication theory, 16(4), 411-426.
16. Hiebert, R. E. (2005). Commentary: new technologies, public relations, and democracy. Public Relations Review, 31(1), 1-9.
17. Highton, B. (2004). Voter registration and turnout in the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 2(3), 507-515.
18. Kellner, D. (2011). Cultural studies, multiculturalism, and media culture. Gender, race, and class in media: A critical reader, 3, 7-18.
19. Kılıç, İ., & Ural, A. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
20. King, R. J., & Whitehead, M. I. (1986). Assessment of the potency of orally administered progestins in women. Fertility and sterility, 46(6), 1062-1066.
21. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Jacoby, W. G. H., Norpoth, H., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008). The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
22. Luecke, R. (2007). Güç, Etki ve İkna. Berktay (Ed), T. Parlak (Trans.). İstanbul: Türkiye İş.
23. Mandiberg, M. (Ed.). (2012). The social media reader. New York: NYU Press.
24. Mayring, P., Gümüş, A., & Duran, M. S. (2011). Nitel sosyal araştırmaya giriş. Bilgesu.
25. McLuhan, M. (2001). Gutenberg Galaksisi (trans. Güven Ç.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 298-299.
26. Miller, W. E. (1992). The puzzle transformed: Explaining declining turnout. Political Behavior, 14(1), 1-43.
27. Miller, W. E., & Shanks, J. M. (1996). The new American voter (pp. 140-46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Milligan, K., Moretti, E., & Oreopoulos, P. (2004). Does education improve citizenship? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of public Economics, 88(9), 1667-1695.
29. Mutlu, E. (1995). İletişim sözlüğü. İstanbul: Ark Yayınevi.
30. Nimmo, D. (1970). The Political Persuaders; The Techniques of Modern Election Campaigns.
31. Oya, T. (2008). Siyasal İletişimi Anlamak. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
32. Peker, Ö., & Aytürk, N. (2000). Etkili yönetim becerileri. Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi, 55-61.
33. Rosenstone, S. J. H., Rosenstone, J. M. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. UK: Macmillan Publishing Company.
34. Rosenstone, S. J., & Wolfinger, R. E. (1980). Who votes. USA: Yale University Press.
35. Taner, K. A. (1997). Siyaset Bilimi. Ankara: Imge Bookstore.
36. Timpone, R. J. (1998). Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 145-158.
37. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. UK: Harvard University Press.
38. Windlesham, L. (1966). Communication and Political Power (London: Jonathan Cape) Chapter 6, and Jeremy Moon. European Integration in British Politics, 1950-1963, A Study of Issue Change, 156-207.
39. Yüksel, A. H., & Bir, A. A. (2005). İkna ve konuşma. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215