How do College Students Clarify Five Sample Spaces for Bertrand’s Chord Problem?
Bongju Lee 1
Yong Sik Yun 2  
More details
Hide details
Kyungpook National University, Daegu, SOUTH KOREA
Jeju National University, Jeju, SOUTH KOREA
Online publish date: 2018-03-02
Publish date: 2018-03-02
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(6):2067–2079
The concept of probability has a unique characteristic that causes confusion when a sample space is not clearly defined. This inherent nature of probability has been demonstrated in Bertrand’s chord problem, which is well-known as the paradox of probability theory. This study demonstrated that a single probability in Bertrand’s chord problem can be obtained by modifying it to clearly redescribe its sample space, and examined that how college students clarify the sample space. To this end, five modified questions were formed using Bertrand’s chord problem to ensure that the sample space of each question was clearly expressed and were used to develop a survey questionnaire. The participants of the survey were 68 college students studying mathematics or mathematics education. The results of this study demonstrated that many college students have difficulty to seek out the sample spaces in some probability problems. Thus we suggested the importance of emphasizing to clarify the sample space in probability education.
Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014). Solving the hard problem of Bertrand’s paradox. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 55(8), 1-15.
Agus, M., Peró-Cebollero, M., Penna, M. P., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2015). Comparing psychology undergraduates’ performance in probabilistic reasoning under verbal-numerical and graphical-pictorial problem presentation format: what is the role of individual and contextual dimensions? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 11(4), 735-750.
Alexander, R., & Kelly, B. (1999). Mathematics 12: Western Canadian edition. Don Mills, Canada: Addison-Wesley.
Batanero, C., & Borovcnik, M. (2016). Statistics and probability in high school. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Batanero, C., Henry, M., & Parzysz, B. (2005). The nature of chance and probability. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in schools: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 15-37). New York, NY: Springer.
Bertrand, J. (1889). Calcul des probabilities [Calculation of probability]. Paris, France: Gauthier-Villars.
Borovcnik, M., & Bentz, H. J. (1991). Sample space and symmetry view. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounter: Probability in education (pp. 77-82). Dordecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2009). Research and developments in probability education. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 111-129.
Borovcnik, M., Bentz, H. J., & Kapadia, R. (1991). A probabilistic perspective. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounter: Probability in education (pp.50-62), Dordecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Chernoff, E. J. (2009). Sample space partitions: An investigative lens. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 19-29.
Chernoff, E. J., & Zazkis, R. (2011). From personal to conventional probabilities: From sample set to sample space. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 15-33.
Choi, J., Yun, Y., & Hwang, H. (2014). A study on pre-service teachers’ understanding of random variable. Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics, 16(1), 19-37.
Drory, A. (2015). Failure and uses of Jaynes’ principle of transformation groups. Foundations of Physics, 45(4), 439-460.
Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1984). Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(1), 1-24.
Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 96-105.
Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: implications for research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 44-63.
Gauvrit, N., & Morsanyi, K. (2014). The equiprobability bias from a mathematical and psychological perspective. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 10(4), 119-130.
Gillies, D. (2000). Philosophical theories of probability. New York, NY: Routledge.
Green, D. R. (1983). A survey of probability concepts in 3000 pupils aged 11-16 years. In D. R. Grey, P. Holmes, V. Barnett, & G. M. Constable (Eds.), Proceeding of the first international conference on teaching statistics (pp. 766-783). Sheffield, UK: Teaching Statistics Trust.
Gyenis, Z., & Rédei, M. (2015). Defusing Bertrand’s paradox. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(2), 349-373.
Hawkins, A., & Kapadia, R. (1984). Children’s conceptions of probability: a psychological and pedagogical review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(4), 349-377.
Jaynes, E. T. (1973). The well-posed problem. Foundations Physics, 3(4), 477-492.
Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., & Mooney, E. S. (2007). Research in probability: Responding to classroom realties. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 909-955). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Jones, G., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C., & Mogill, A. (1997). A framework for assessing and nurturing young children’s thinking in probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(2), 101-125.
Jones, G., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C., & Mogill, A. (1999). Students’ probabilistic thinking in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 487-519.
Kim, J. H. (2008). Probability Theory for insurance mathematics. Seoul, Korea: Kyo Woo Sa.
Klyve, D. (2013). In defense of Bertrand: The non-restrictiveness of reasoning by example. Philosophia Mathematics, 21(3), 365-370.
Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 59-98.
Kwon, J. G., & Lee, B. (2015). Probabilistic misconceptions of elementary pre-service teachers. Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics, 25(1), 179-188.
Kwon, J. G., Kim, H. J., & Lee, B. (2014). The differences of probabilistic thinking between ordinary students and students talented in mathematics and science across grade levels. Proceedings of the Jangjeon Mathematical Society, 17(2), 259-271.
Lee, K. H. (1997). A Study on the Probability. The Science Education Research Collection of Cheongju National University of Education, 18, 21-35.
Marinoff, L. (1994). A resolution of Bertrand’s paradox. Philosophy of Science, 61(1), 1-24.
Porto, P. D., Crosignant, B., Ciattoni, A., & Liu, H. C. (2011). Bertrand’s paradox: A physical way out along the lines of buffon’s needle throwing experiment. European Journal of Physics, 32(3), 819-826.
Rowbottom, D. P. (2013). Bertrand’s paradox revisited: Why Bertrand’s solutions’ are all inapplicable. Philosophia Mathematics, 21(1), 110-114.
Rubel, L. H. (2007). Middle school and high school students’ probabilistic reasoning on coin tasks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 531-556.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (1977). Misconceptions of probability: an experiment with a small-group, activity-based, model building approach to introductory probability at the college level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8(3), 295-316.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (1998). Research in probability and statistics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465-494). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Speiser, B., & Walter, C. (1998). Two dice, two sample spaces. In L. Pereira-Mendoza (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth international conference on teaching statistics (pp. 61-66). Singapore: International Statistical Institute.
Woo, J. H. (1998). Educational basis for school mathematics. Seoul, Korea: Seoul National University Press.