Incline Height and Object Weight: Examining the Fluidity of Children’s Commonsense Theories of Motion
Michael Hast 1  
More details
Hide details
School of Management and Social Science, St Mary’s University, Twickenham, UK
Online publication date: 2018-01-21
Publication date: 2018-01-21
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(4):1407–1413
144 children aged 5 to 12 years made initial predictions about the speeds of a heavy and a light ball rolling down a slope. They were then asked to consider how changing the incline height would impact the initial predictions. The findings illustrate a shift from rigid differentiation to more flexible knowledge structures. While perceptions changed with increasing age from light-as-faster to heavy-as-faster, younger children were also less likely to believe that any other incline steepness could conceivably lead to a different outcome. Older children, on the other hand, showed a heightened awareness of how changing incline heights could allow for alternative motion patterns. The study adds to current understanding of conceptual development. It expands on the debate between knowledge-in-pieces and knowledge-as-theory, concluding within its constrained scope that development of scientific knowledge about object motion possibly occurs in a transition from pieces to theory. Consequentially, the paper also considers implications for early science education.
Baroody, A. J., Lai, M.-L., Li, X., & Baroody, A. E. (2009). Preschoolers’ understanding of subtraction-related principles. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1-2), 41-60.
Brown, D. E., & Hammer, D. (2013). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 121-137). London: Routledge.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clark, D. B., & Linn, M. C. (2013). The knowledge integration perspective: Connections across research and education. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 520-538). London: Routledge.
diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 265-281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
diSessa, A. A. (2013). A bird’s-eye-view of the “pieces” vs. “coherence” controversy (from the “pieces” side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 31-48). London: Routledge.
Ferretti, R. P., Butterfield, E. C., Cahn, A., & Kerkman, D. (1985). The classification of children’s knowledge: Development on the balance-scale and inclined-plane task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(1), 131-160.
Hast, M. (2014). Exploring the shift in children’s incline motion predictions: Fragmentation and integration of knowledge as possible contributors. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 4(2), 74-81.
Hast, M. (2016). Children’s reasoning about rolling down curves: Arguing the case for a two-component commonsense theory of motion. Science Education, 100(5), 837-848.
Hast, M., & Howe, C. (2012). Understanding the beliefs informing children’s commonsense theories of motion: The role of everyday object variables in dynamic event predictions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(1), 3-15.
Hast, M., & Howe, C. (2013a). Towards a complete commonsense theory of motion: The interaction of dimensions in children’s predictions of natural object motion. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1649-1662.
Hast, M., & Howe, C. (2013b). The development of children’s understanding of speed change: A contributing factor towards commonsense theories of motion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 337-350.
Hast, M., & Howe, C. (2017). Changing predictions, stable recognition: Children’s representations of downward incline motion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 516-530.
Howe, C., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Intensive quantities: Why they matter to developmental research. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 307-330.
Howe, C., Tolmie, A., & Rodgers, C. (1992). The acquisition of conceptual knowledge in science by primary school children: Group interaction and the understanding of motion down an incline. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(2), 113-130.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence (A. Parsons & S. Milgram, Trans.). London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ioannides, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2002). The changing meanings of force. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(1), 5-62.
Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 362-381.
Mou, Y., Zhu, L., & Chen, Z. (2015). Developmental changes in children’s understanding of horizontal projectile motion. International Journal of Psychology, 50(4), 256-264.
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nersessian, N. J. (2013). Mental modeling in conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 395-411). London: Routledge.
Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual change and education. Human Development, 50(1), 47-54.
Vosniadou, S. (2013). Conceptual change in learning and instruction: The framework theory approach. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 11-30). London: Routledge.
Wagner, J. F. (2010). A transfer-in-pieces consideration of the perception of structure in the transfer of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4), 443-479.
Wilkening, F. (1981). Integrating velocity, time, and distance information: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), 231-247.