0.903
IF
1.06
CiteScore
0.510
SJR
1.062
SNIP
Special issue paper
 
CC-BY 4.0
 
 

Interaction Between Educational Approach and Space: The Case of Montessori

 
1
Department of Interiour Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TURKEY
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(1):265–274
Online publish date: 2017-11-06
Publish date: 2017-11-06
KEYWORDS:
This article has been presented in ICES 2017 - International Conference on Environmental Sciences & Educational Studies. This article belongs to the special issue " Interdisciplinary Research on the Environmental Education, Educational Studies in Sustainability & Instructional Technologies and Designs".
ABSTRACT:
This study aims to emphasize that the realization of effective educational approaches depends on the design of spaces suitable for the determined philosophy, and to reveal the design decisions required by the Montessori educational approach. A three-step method was followed in the line of the aim of this study. The first step is to acquire theoretical knowledge about the Montessori educational approach. The second step is to perform a spatial analysis based on the obtained plan schedules and visual materials from the school samples that have adopted the Montessori educational approach and designed by the designers according to this approach and the final step is to bring design decisions to designers and educators in order to create educational environments for the Montessori educational approach, depending on the literature and school analysis. In the study, it is observed in Montessori educational approach that the relationship between interior and exterior spaces is very important, that the circulation spaces and classrooms are designed as flexible multipurpose spaces depending on the basic principles of freedom, socialization, and that child-scale design and natural light are extremely important for all of the areas in question. It is seen that the Montessori approach is influential on educational spaces and the presence of spaces embodying this approach has a correspondence in architecture. In this context, this study, which reveals the relationship between learning environments and learning efficiency, is considered to be a source of data for the schools to be designed in this direction.
 
REFERENCES (20):
1. Aydın, İ. (2012). Alternatif okullar. Ankara, Türkiye: Pegem Akademi, 60-61.
2. Bartolomeis, D. F. (1973). Maria Montessori e la pedogogia scientifica. Floransa: La Nuova Italia Editrice.
3. Chan, T. C. (1988). The aesthetic environment and student learning. School Business Affairs, 54(1), 26–27.
4. Durakoğlu, A. (2010). Montessori metodunda okuma ve yazma eğitimi. Aile ve Toplum, 11/5(20).
5. Goffin, S., & Wilson, C. (2001). Curriculum models and early childhood education appraising the relationships. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
6. İslamoğlu, Ö. (2014). A Method Suggestion for Determination of Flexibility Strategy in Schools (PhD Thesis). Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology.
7. Jesus, D. R. (1987). Design guidelines for montessori schools, Center for Architecture and Urban Planning Research Books, Milwaukee, 28.
8. Karabey, H., & Erkılıç, M. (2000). Eğitim felsefeleri ve okul yapıları. XXI Mimarlık Kültürü Dergisi, 03, 72-76.
9. Mallory, T. (1989). Montessori ve çocuğunuz, ana-babanın el kitabı (Trans: Füsun Öztaş ve Cihan Gülten). Ankara. Hatiboglu Yayınevi, 88.
10. Montessori, M. (1950). La scoperta del bambino. Roma: Garzanti, 114.
11. Montessori, M. (1932). Educazione e pace. ginevre: Bureau İnternational d’Education, 155.
12. Montessori, M. (1953). La mente del bambino. Roma: Officine Grafiche Aldo Garzanti. 8-12.
13. Montessori, M. (1964). Spontaneous Activity in Education, Robert Bentley Inc.
14. Montessori, M. (1975). Çocuk eğitimi. (Trans: Y. Güler). İstanbul: Sander Yayınları.
15. Montessori, M. (1997). Çocuk Eğitimi, Montessori Metodu. (Trans: Güler Yücel), 5. Eds., İstanbul: Özgür Yayınları, 224,.
16. Orem, R. C. (1970). Montessori, her method and the movement. New York: Capricorn Books, 121.
17. Pollard, M. (1996). Maria Montessori. (Trans: Leyla Onat). Ankara: İlk kaynak Kültür ve Sanat Ürünleri.
18. Schafer, C. (2006). Ömür Törpüsü mü? Bal Küpü mü? (Trans: Ceyda Aydın). İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık, 30-31.
19. Sivri, H. (2014), Okul Öncesi Eğitime Farklı Yaklaşımlar: Montessori ve Reggio Emilia, Ege Mimarlık, 52-57.
20. Standing, E. M. (1957). Maria Montessori: Her Life and Work, New York: Plume, 263-280.
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215