Methodology of Research Activity Development in Preparing Future Teachers with the Use of Information Resources
More details
Hide details
Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, CHINA
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN
Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, RUSSIA
Online publish date: 2017-11-05
Publish date: 2017-11-05
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(11):7399–7410
The modern paradigm of education development has new demands on the professional and personal traits of a teacher, in particular, the ability to organize research activity of schoolchildren and to support their interest in science. The research competence of future teachers is a key characteristic that provides these skills. Properly organized research activity of future science teachers contributes not only to their research competence development, but also to their self-confidence as a professional, and thus, supports their motivation for further improvement in the field of teaching. This article presents a developed model of a methodological system for organizing the research activity development in training the future biologists at the pedagogical university. Based on the model, we have developed a comprehensive program for student’s research competence development, which was tested at two courses of a pedagogical university. Comparison of the nine experimental groups (220 students) and nine control groups (218 students) showed that our program designed to develop student’s research competence is effective. The paper also discusses the conditions, under which the program is effective, in particular, the importance of continuing education of teacher educators, as well as the necessity of interaction between educational and scientific institutions.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Preservice and experienced biology teachers’global and specific subject matter structures: implications for conceptions of pedagogical content knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2(1).
Adúriz-Bravo, A., Bonan, L., Galli, L. G., Chion, A. R., & Meinardi, E. (2005). Scientific argumentation in pre-service biology teacher education. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 1(1), 76-83.
Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries (No. 41).
Anderson, W. A., Banerjee, U., Drennan, C. L., Elgin, S. C. R., Epstein, I. R., Handelsman, J., … Warner, I. M. (2011). Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities. Science, 331(6014), 152–153.
Aydeniz, M., Baksa, K., & Skinner, J. (2011). Understanding the Impact of an Apprenticeship-Based Scientific Research Program on High School Students’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(4), 403–421.
Carrick, T. (1983). Some biology teachers’ goals for advanced level teaching. Journal of Biological Education, 17(3), 205-214.
Chen, C.-Y., Pedersen, S., & Murphy, K. L. (2012). The influence of perceived information overload on student participation and knowledge construction in computer-mediated communication. Instructional Science, 40, 325–349.
Eick, C. J. (2000). Inquiry, nature of science, and evolution: the need for a more complex pedagogical content knowledge in science teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 1–9.
Fleischner, T. L., Espinoza, R. E., Gerrish, G. A., Greene, H. W., Kimmerer, R. W., Lacey, E. A., ... & Weisberg, S. (2017). Teaching Biology in the Field: Importance, Challenges, and Solutions. BioScience, 67(6), 558-567.
Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., … Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific Teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521–522.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.
Karpuk, N. V. (2008). Realizing the national-regional component of education in the structure of specialist training. The Journal of Secondary Vocational Education, 1, 42–43.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Labov, J. B., Reid, A. H., & Yamamoto, K. R. (2010). Integrated Biology and Undergraduate Science Education: A New Biology Education for the Twenty-First Century? CBE Life Sciences Education, 9, 10–16.
Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601.
Moore, A. (2012). Teaching and learning: Pedagogy, curriculum and culture. Routledge.
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.
Prahl, K. (2017). Best Practices for the Think-Pair-Share Active-Learning Technique. The American Biology Teacher, 79(1), 3-8.
Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chudá, J. (2007). Slovakian Students’ Attitudes toward Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4).
Romanovskaya, I. A. (2010). The structure of a future teacher’s research attitude. Modern High Technologies, 10, 127–131.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447–472.
Schallies, M., & Lembens, A. (2002). Student learning by research. Journal of Biological Education, 37(1), 13-17.
Shihusa, H., & Keraro, F. N. (2009). Using Advance Organizers to Enhance Students’ Motivation in Learning Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(4).
Subramaniam, K. (2014). Student teachers’ conceptions of teaching biology. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 91-97.
Thornton, S. J. (2001). Educating the Educators: Rethinking Subject Matter and Methods. Theory into Practice, 40(1), 72–78.
Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: ready for take-off?. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 157-177.
Trushchenko, Ye. N. (2007). The major areas in organizing the independent work. The Journal of Secondary Vocational Education, 10, 26–28.
UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030. (2015). Retrieved from
Vikhoreva, O. A. (2009). High school students’ research activity in further education. The world of science, culture and education, 6, 122–124.
Whitty, G. (2014). Recent developments in teacher training and their consequences for the ‘University Project’in education. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 466-481.
Wilson, A., Howitt, S., & Higgins, D. (2016). Assessing the unassessable: making learning visible in undergraduates’ experiences of scientific research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 901–916.
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Shavelson, R. J., & Kuhn, C. (2015). The international state of research on measurement of competency in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(3), 393–411.