RESEARCH PAPER
Monitoring of the Educational Process with the Use of Information and Communication Technologies: A Case Study in Computer Science
 
More details
Hide details
1
Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after M. Akmullah, Ufa, RUSSIA
2
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
3
Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov, Kazan, RUSSIA
4
Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, Samara, RUSSIA
Online publish date: 2018-04-10
Publish date: 2018-04-10
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(6):2379–2391
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
The main goal of the present paper is to get a feedback of the Computer Science lessons in order to introduce consecutive changes in Computer Science curriculum for enhancing the efficiency of the educational process. One of the prospective ways of solving such a problem is the use of information and communication technologies that help searching for an option for enhancing the efficiency. The aim of the current research is to develop monitoring of the educational process at the Computer Science lessons with the use of information and communication technologies and the implementation of the process concerning teachers’ deliberate acquirement of monitoring skills. The essential method is monitoring that can improve the state of schooling at the Computer Science lessons by means of identifying problems and deliberate individual work. The paper deals with the step-by-step algorithm of the monitoring implementation at the Computer Science lessons. This algorithm includes the following stages: introductory and motivational, reproductive self work, productive self work and final stage. The peculiarity of monitoring is its traceability of the educational process, a phased examination and progress assessment at the Computer Science lessons. The implementation of phased monitoring at the Computer Science lessons aims at classroom management, the development of educational work and impartial progress assessment.
 
REFERENCES (33):
1. Asadullin, R. (2016). Pedagogics of the subject-oriented education. Ufa: M. Akmulla BSPU.
2. Ballou, D., & Springer, M. G. (2015). Using Student Test Scores to Measure Teacher Performance. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
3. Bedesem, P. L., & Dieker, L. A. (2013). Self-Monitoring with a Twist. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(4), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830....
4. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longman.
5. Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R. J., Corso, M. J., & Haywood, D. E. (2014). Promoting Student Engagement in the Classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1-34.
6. Burbules, N. (2004). Ways of Thinking about Educational Quality. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
7. Chen, L. L. (2011). Improving Teachers’ Teaching with Communication Technology. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.40.....
8. Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Assessing Assessment in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(3), 187-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
9. Csapo, B. (2007). Research into learning to learn through the assessment of quality and organization of learning outcomes. The Curriculum Journal, 18(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851....
10. Edmunds, J. A. (2008). Using Alternative Lenses to Examine Effective Teachers’ Use of Technology with Low-Performing Students. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 195-217.
11. Ghatala, E. S. (2011). Strategy-Monitoring Training Enables Young Learners to Select Effective Strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(2), 43-54.
12. Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher Preparation for Quality Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
13. Hsieh, F. J., Law, C. K., & Shy, H. Y. (2011). Mathematics Teacher Education Quality in TEDS-M: Globalizing the Views of Future Teachers and Teacher Educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
14. Kaptelinin, V. (1999). Learning Together: Educational Benefits and Prospects for Computer Support. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3), 499-508. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327....
15. Khan, M. S., Bibi, S., & Hasan, M. (2016). Australian Technical Teachers’ Experience of Technology Integration in Teaching. SAGE Open, 6(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824....
16. Khuziakhmetov, A. N., & Sytina, N. S. (2016). Educational Process Navigator as Means of Creation of Individual Educational Path of a Student. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(9), 2255-2264.
17. Lebedeva, O., Bykova, S., Masalimova, A. R., Sokolova, N. L., & Kryukova, N. I. (2018). Peculiarities of developing high school students’ lexical skills by means of the programmed learning technology. XLinguae, 11(1), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.20....
18. Louie, B. Y., Drevdahl, D. J., Purdy, J. M., & Stackman, R. W. (2003). Advancing the Scholarship of Teaching through Collaborative Self-Study. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 150-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/002215....
19. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326....
20. Nair, C. S., Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2010). Leadership and Management of Quality in Higher Education. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/978178....
21. Näykki, P., Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. (2017). Monitoring makes a difference: quality and temporal variation in teacher education students’ collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/003138....
22. Pange, J. (2004). How often do Pre-School Teachers in Greece Use Nt and ICT in Their Classrooms? A Study of Continuing Education Needs. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 10(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.7227/JACE.1....
23. Pyl, S. J. (1989). Diagnostic reports as bases for decisions on teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-0....
24. Richards, C. E. (1988). A Typology of Educational Monitoring Systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(2), 106-116. https://doi.org/10.3102/016237....
25. Robertson, H. J. (2003). Teacher Education and Information and Communications Technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 280-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
26. Rozhina, V.A., & Baklashova, T.A. (2018). Teaching English language to young school-age children while making projects, playing games and using robotics. XLinguae, 11(1), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.20....
27. Schunk, D. H. (1982). Progress Self-Monitoring. Effects on Children’s Self-Efficacy and Achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 51(2), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/002209....
28. Seo, D., McGrane, J., & Taherbhai, H. (2015). The Role of Student Growth Percentiles in Monitoring Learning and Predicting Learning Outcomes. Educational Assessment, 20(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/106271....
29. Shaffer, D. W., Nash, P., & Ruis, A. R. (2015). Technology and the New Professionalization of Teaching. Teachers College Record, 117(12), 1-30.
30. Sorden, S. D. (2005). A cognitive approach to instructional design for multimedia learning. Informing science journal, 8, 263-279. https://doi.org/10.28945/498.
31. Tuninga, R. S., & Seinen, I. B. (1995). The Supply and Demand of Distance Education in Russia. Washington: The World Bank, Bureau Cross.
32. Usova, A. V. (2002). How to Make Learning Interesting and Successful. Russian Education & Society, 44(2), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES106....
33. Wang, J., Lin, E., Spalding, E., Klecka, C. L., & Odell, S. J. (2011). Quality Teaching and Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215