RESEARCH PAPER
Phenomenography-based Study on MOOC Deep Learning Mode
Jiuru Huang 1  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Marxism, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, CHINA
Online publication date: 2017-11-14
Publication date: 2017-11-14
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(11):7599–7604
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Phenomenography is a kind of teaching methodology put forward and used by the research team of education at University of Gothenburg, Sweden. It is between the macro level and the micro level. In recent years, the empirical study carried out with phenomenography in Western education research field has been widely accepted. At the same time, it is worth noting whether MOOC will overturn traditional teaching methods in university. This has always been a hot topic from the fanatical pursuit of MOOC to rational reflection upon it. Education researchers around the world all hope to explore a new teaching model to improve the quality and efficiency of modern tertiary education by virtue of the power of MOOC, which makes it possible to apply phenomenography to the MOOC teaching mode. This paper endeavors to carry out essential analysis on the quantity difference and qualitative difference involved in the individual experience phenomenon to improve the influential factors restricting MOOC itself, thus releasing the vitality of the micro subject (teachers and students) and making up for the limitations of MOOC compared with traditional teaching.
 
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Anders, A. (2015). Theories and Applications of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs): The Case for Hybrid Design. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 39-61.
 
2.
Ebner, N. (2016). Negotiation and Conflict Resolution Education in the Age of the MOOC. Negotiation Journal, 32(3), 231-260.
 
3.
Fox, A. (2013). From MOOCs to SPOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 38-40. doi:10.1145/2535918.
 
4.
Greene, J. A., Oswald, C. A., & Pomerantz, J. (2015). Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 925-953.
 
5.
Guo, S. S., & Zhang, G. Z. (2017). Analyzing concept complexity, knowledge ageing and diffusion pattern of Moc. Scientometrics, 112(1), 416-428.
 
6.
Jamie, L., & Peggy, A. E. (2016). Moococracy: the learning culture of massive open online courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1013-1019.
 
7.
Jones, M. L., Regner, L. (2016). Users or Students? Privacy in University MOOCS. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1473-1486.
 
8.
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—Describing Conceptions of the World around Us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177-200.
 
9.
Norberg, A., Handel, A., & Odling, P. (2015). Using MOOCs at Learning Centers in Northern Sweden. International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 16(6), 137-150.
 
10.
Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, R. F., Wang, N., Scull, J., Ahmad, S., & Evans, C. (2014). Moving Through MOOCs: Understanding the Progression of Users in Massive Open Online Courses. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 421-430.
 
11.
Rolandsson, L., Skogh, I. B., & Barbutiu, S. M (2017). Bridging a gap: in search of an analytical tool capturing teachers’ perceptions of their own teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(3), 445-458.
 
12.
Zhang, D. J., Allon, G., & Van Mieghem, J. A. (2017). Does Social Interaction Improve Learning Outcomes? Evidence from Field Experiments on Massive Open Online Courses. M & Som-Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(3), 347-367.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215