Pre-service Science Teachers’ Understanding of Chemistry: A Factorial Design Study
More details
Hide details
Kirklareli University, Kirklareli, TURKEY
Istanbul University, Istanbul, TURKEY
Online publish date: 2018-05-04
Publish date: 2018-05-04
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(7):2817–2837
This study compared the effect of the instructional treatments (guided inquiry-based and traditional recipe-like approach) and the learning environments (authentic and virtual learning environments) on pre-service science teachers’ understanding of chemistry concepts. For this purpose, Authentic Inquiry-based Laboratory, Virtual Inquiry-based Laboratory, Authentic Recipe-like Laboratory and Virtual Recipe-like Laboratory were designed. Eight laboratory activities related to thermochemistry, chemical kinetics, chemical equilibrium, acids and bases and electrochemistry were developed. Sixty-eight pre-service science teachers were randomly stratified into four equal groups: Authentic Inquiry-based Laboratory, Virtual Inquiry-based Laboratory, Virtual Recipe-like Laboratory and Authentic Recipe-like Laboratory. A two-tier General Chemistry Concept Test developed by researchers was used for the data collection tool before and after the treatment and data were analysed using nonparametric statistical methods. According to the results there was a significant difference between post test scores of groups and this difference was between Authentic Inquiry-based Laboratory and Authentic Recipe-like Laboratory, Virtual Inquiry-based Laboratory and Authentic Recipe-like Laboratory. Mean scores of groups were arranged from the highest to the least as Authentic Inquiry-based Laboratory, Virtual Inquiry-based Laboratory, Virtual Recipe-like Laboratory and Authentic Recipe-like Laboratory. Each item of the test was also analysed and changing of alternative conceptions was assessed. Decreasing of frequencies of alternative conceptions were generally arranged same as mean scores except for chemical kinetics.
1. Akben, N. (2015). The Effect of Open Inquiry-Based Laboratory Activities on Prospective Teachers’ Misconceptions about Matter. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(3), 164-178.
2. Almuntasheri, S., Gillies, R. M., & Wright, T. (2016). The Effectiveness of a Guided Inquiry-Based, Teachers’ Professional Development Programme on Saudi Students’ Understanding of Density. Science Education International, 27(1), 16-39.
3. Altun, E. H., Feyzioglu, B., & Demirag, B. (2011). Development of Interactive Virtual Chemistry Laboratory Enriched by Constructivist Learning Activities for High School. TUBITAK, Project number: 108K293.
4. Altun, E., Demirdag, B., Feyzioglu, B., Ates, A. & Cobanoglu, I. (2009). Developing an Interactive Virtual Chemistry Laboratory Enriched With Constructivist Learning Activities For Secondary Schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1895-1898.
5. Bakar, H. N. B., & Zaman, H. H. B. (2007). Development of VLab-Chem for Chemistry Subject Based On Constructivism-Cognitivism-Contextual Approach. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Indonesia.
6. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., & Wozney, L. (2004). How Does Distance Education Compare with Classroom Instruction? A Meta Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
7. Bozkurt, E. (2008). The Effect on Students’ Success of a Virtual Laboratory Application Prepared in the Physics Education (PhD Dissertation), University of Selcuk.
8. Buckner, E., & Kim P. (2014). Integrating technology and pedagogy for inquiry-based learning: The Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE). Prospects, 44(1), 99-118.
9. Bucos, M. C., Dragulescu, B., & Ternauciuc, A. (2008). Developing Virtual Labs at “Politehnica” University of Timisoara. Paper Presented at the Interactive Conference on Computer Aided Learning.
10. Carnevale, D. (2003). The Virtual Lab Experiment. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(21).
11. Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The Effects of Distance Education On K–12 Student Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. London: Learning Point Associates.
12. Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The Development of a Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument for Evaluating Secondary School Students’ Ability to Describe and Explain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Levels of Representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293-307.
13. Cheung, D. (2008). Facilitating Chemistry Teachers to Implement Inquiry-Based Laboratory Work. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 107-130.
14. Chiappetta, E. L., & Adams, A. D. (2004). Inquiry-based Instruction. The Science Teacher, 71(2), 46–50.
15. Colburn, A. (2000). An Inquiry Primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42-44.
16. Coppola, B. P., & Lawton, R. G. (1995). Who Has the Same Substance That I Have? A Blueprint for Collaborative Learning Activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 72, 1120-1122.
17. Crowther, D.T. (1999). Here We Grow Again: Applications of Research and Model Inquiry Lessons. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(3), 1-4.
18. Dalgarno, B. (2015). A VRML Virtual Chemistry Laboratory Incorporating Reusable Prototypes for Object Manipulation. Retrieved on 10.01.2017 from
19. Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., & Bedgood, J. D. R. (2003). The Potential of VL for Distance Education Science Teaching: Reflections from the Development and Evaluation of a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory. Paper Presented at the Uniserve Science Improving Learning Outcomes Symposium, Sydney.
20. Diker, M. (2011). Virtual Laboratory for Computer Programming Lesson (Master Dissertation), University of Afyon Kocatepe.
21. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). New York: McGram-Hill Companies.
22. Franklin, B., Xiang, L., Collett, J., Rhoads, M., & Osborn, J. (2015). Open Inquiry-Based Learning Elicits Deeper Understanding of Complex Physiological Concepts Compared to Traditional Lecture-Style or Guided-Inquiry Learning Methods. The FASEB Journal, 29(1), 541-22.
23. Georgiou, J., Dimitropoulos, K., & Manitsaris, A. (2007). A Virtual Reality Laboratory for Distance Education in Chemistry. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 34-41.
24. Gershenson, C., Gonzalez, P. P., & Negrete, J. (2000). Thinking Adaptive: Towards a Behaviours Virtual Laboratory. Paper Presented at the 6. International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive, Paris.
25. Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2005). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and Understanding Data. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Press.
26. Hawkins, I., & Phelps, A. J. (2013). Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 516-523.
27. Hemraj-Benny, T., & Beckford, I. (2014). Cooperative and inquiry-based learning utilizing art-related topics: Teaching chemistry to community college nonscience majors. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(10), 1618-1622.
28. Hinrichsen, J., & Jarrett, D. (1999). Science Inquiry for the Classroom a Literature Review. Oregon: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
29. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research. Review of educational research, 52(2), 201-217.
30. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty‐First Century. Science education, 88(1), 28-54.
31. Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The Laboratory in Science Education: The State of the Art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 105-107.
32. Hofstein, A., Shore, R., & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing High School Chemistry Students with Opportunities to Develop Learning Skills in an Inquiry-Type Laboratory: A Case Study. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 47- 62.
33. Hsiao, H. S., Chen, J. C., Hong, J. C., Chen, P. H., Lu, C. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2017). A five-stage prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model to improve students’ learning performance in science courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3393-3416.
34. Jezierska, K., Podraza, W., Domek, H., & Szwed, J. (2016). The Virtual Laboratory for Student Understanding of Biophysics. National Academy Science Letters, 39(4), 295-299.
35. Johnstone, A. H., & Wham, A. J. B. (1982). The Demands of Practical Work. Education in Chemistry, 71-73.
36. Kamlaskar, C. H. (2007). Development and Evaluation of an Interactive Multimedia Simulation on Electronics Lab Activity: Wien Bridge Oscillator. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(3), 13-30.
37. Karamustafaoglu, O., & Yaman, S. (2010). Fen Egitiminde Ozel Ogretim Yontemleri I-II. Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.
38. Kaya, G., & Yılmaz, S. (2016). Açık sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenmenin öğrencilerin başarısına ve bilimsel süreç becerilerinin gelişimine etkisi [The Impact of Open Inquiry Based Learning on Students’ Achievement and Development of Science Process Skills]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2), 300-318.
39. Kennepohl, D. (2001). Using Computer Simulations to Supplement Teaching Laboratory in Chemistry for Distance Delivery. The Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 58-65.
40. Lily, Q., Gang, Z., Yong, P., Tingfu, M., & Ming, G. (2008). Three-dimensional Virtual Chemical Laboratory Based on Virtual Reality Modelling Language. Paper Presented at the IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education, Xiamen.
41. Lim, B. R. (2001). Guidelines for Designing Inquiry-Based Learning on the Web: Online Professional Development of Educators (PhD Dissertation), Indiana University.
42. Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The School Science Laboratory: Historical Perspectives and Centres for Contemporary Teaching. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Ed.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
43. Mercer-Chalmers, J. D., Goodfellow, C. L., & Price, G. J. (2004). Using a VLE to Enhance a Foundation Chemistry Laboratory Module. CAL-Laborate, 12, 14-18.
44. National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and National Science Educational Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
45. Ozdener, N. (2005). Using of Analogy in Experimental Teaching Methods. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 4-13.
46. Ozkan, E. Ç., & Bümen, N. T. (2014). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde araştırmaya dayalı öğrenmenin öğrencilerin erişilerine, kavram öğrenmelerine, üstbiliş farkındalıklarına ve fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik tutumlarına etkisi [The Effects of Inquiry Based Learning in Science and Technology Course on Students’ Achievements, Concept Learning, Metacognition Awareness and Attitudes towards Science and Technology Course]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 251-278.
47. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual, a Step by Step a Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. England: McGraw-Hill Education.
48. Ramnarain, U. D. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and teacher education, 38, 65-75.
49. Roth, W. M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 197–223.
50. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The Teaching of Science as Inquiry. In J. J. Schwab and P. F. Brandwein (Ed.), The teaching of science. Cambridge: Harvard University Pres.
51. Singer, S. R., Hilton, M. L., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2006). America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision. Washington D.C.: National Research Council, National Academies Press.
52. Stieff, M., & Wilensky, U. (2003). Connected Chemistry-Incorporating Interactive Simulations into the Chemistry Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 285-302.
53. Tatli, Z. (2011). Development, Application and Evaluation of Virtual Chemistry Laboratory Experiments for Chemical Changes Unit at Secondary School 9th Grade Curriculum (PhD Dissertation), Karadeniz Technical University.
54. Tobin, K. G. (1990). Research on Science Laboratory Activities. In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403–418.
55. Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and Use of Diagnostic Tests to Evaluate Students’ Misconceptions in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
56. Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., & Almedia, L. (2002). Science Learning in Virtual Environments: A Descriptive Study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 471-488.
57. Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating Secondary Students’ Scientific Reasoning in Genetics Using a Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1098.
58. Tuysuz, C. (2010). The Effect of the Virtual Laboratory on Students’ Achievement and Attitude in Chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37-53.
59. Wimmers, L. E. (2001). Practicing Real Science in the Laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(3), 167-171.
60. Woodfield, B. (2005). Virtual Chemlab Getting Started, Pearson Education. Retrieved on 26.04.2015 from http://www.mypearsontraining.c....
61. Yang, K. Y., & Heh J. S. (2007). The Impact of Internet Virtual Physics Laboratory Instruction on the Achievement in Physics, Science Process Skills and Computer Attitudes of 10th Grade Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 451–461.
62. Yetişir, M. I. (2016). Rehberli Araştırma-Sorgulamaya Dayalı Fizik Öğretimi: Öğretmen Adaylarının Akademik Başarıları Ve Uygulama Hakkındaki Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi [Physics Teaching based on Guided-Inquiry-Based Learning: Investigation of Pre-service Teachers’ Achievement and Opinion about Treatment]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 49(1), 159-182.