RESEARCH PAPER
Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Students’ Learning Styles When Teaching Functions: A Case of Zimbabwean Schools
 
More details
Hide details
1
Vengere High School, Rusape, ZIMBABWE
2
University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA
Online publish date: 2018-05-15
Publish date: 2018-05-15
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(7):3225–3233
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper reports on a research that was done to explore how ordinary level mathematics teachers used their knowledge of their students’ learning styles when teaching functions. The study was carried out at eight secondary schools in the Makoni District of Manicaland Province in Zimbabwe. The schools were selected using stratified random sampling. Twenty-five mathematics teachers at the selected schools participated in the research. Data were obtained through face to face interviews and document analysis. The findings revealed that the mathematics teachers’ teaching and assessment strategies were not based on their knowledge of their students’ learning styles. Information and communication technology (ICT) and audio teaching aids were not used by most of the teachers. The researchers recommended that the mathematics teachers be in-serviced on the implications of students’ learning styles for mathematics teaching. The teachers also needed some in-service training on how to use different forms of ICT in mathematics teaching.
 
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Abuzaid, R. A., Nadarajan, R., & Naimie, Z. (2016). Do we have salt and pepper on the table? (Teaching styles & learning styles important). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
 
2.
Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. (2010). ICT use in the teaching of mathematics: Implications for professional development of pre-service teachers in Ghana. Twente: University of Twente.
 
3.
Al-balhan, E. M. (2007). Learning styles in relation to academic performance in middle school Mathematics. Middle East: Domes.
 
4.
Barke, O. P. (2009). Learning styles Knowledge, issues and application for classroom teachers. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
 
5.
Bender, W. N., & Waller, L. (2011). Differentiated Math Instruction. New York: Corwin Press.
 
6.
Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement, and statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
 
7.
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative Math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
 
8.
Dasari, P. (2006). The influence of mismatching teaching and learning styles on the achievement in Science of grade six learners. Bloemfontein: University of Free State.
 
9.
Felder, R. M. (2010). Are learning styles invalid on course newsletter? A response to claims that no evidence justifies taking learning styles into account when designing instruction.
 
10.
Haas, S. C. (2003). Algebra for gifted visual spatial learners. Gifted Education Communicator (spring), 34(1), 30-31; 42-43.
 
11.
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1986). The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey.
 
12.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory – Version 3.1: 2005 Technical Specifications. Haygroup: Experience Based Learning Systems Inc.
 
13.
Laura, R. (2017). What is differentiated instruction? New York: Rowan University.
 
14.
Matseke, A. M. (2013). Capacity Building for curriculum differentiated in the teaching of foundation phase Mathematics in Ngwaritsi Circuit. Limpopo: University of South Africa.
 
15.
Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education Mathematics syllabus forms 1-4 (2015). Harare: Curriculum Development and Technical Services.
 
16.
Mohanty, R. R. (2011). ICT advantages and disadvantages. Retrieved on 13 August 2017 from http://www.ict-adv-disadv-blog....
 
17.
Moore, N. D. (2012). Alternative strategies for teaching Mathematics (M.S. Ed. thesis). Brockport, NY: State University of New York. Retrieved on 22 July 2017 from http://digitalcommons.brockpor....
 
18.
Patel, K. L., & Singh, S. (2014). Matching and Mismatching of learning styles and teaching styles: A conceptual perspective. Shaikshik Parisamvad (An International Journal of Education), 4, 20-26.
 
19.
Perini, M. J., Silver, H. F., & Strong, R. W. (2000). So Each May Learn: Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. Alexandria, West Virginia USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
 
20.
Powell, W., & Powell, O. K. (2016). Knowing our students as learners. Alexandria: ASCD.
 
21.
Tinker, R. (2017). Information Technology in Science and Mathematics Education. Retrieved on 15 July 2017 from https://concord.org/sites/defa....
 
22.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
 
23.
Umugiraneza, O., & Bansilal, S. (2017). Exploring teachers’ practices in teaching mathematics and statistics in Kwazulu- Natal schools. South African Journal of Education, 37(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.....
 
24.
Weselby, C. (2017). What is differentiated instruction? Examples of how differentiated instruction in the classroom. Oregon: Concodia University.
 
25.
White, K. M. (2012). The effect of an instructional model utilizing hands-on learning and manipulatives on Maths achievement of middle school students in Georgia (Doctoral dissertation). Lynchburg, VA: Liberty University. Retrieved on 22 July 2017 from http://digitalcommons.liberty.....
 
26.
Yousuf, M., & Behlol, M. G. (2015). Effectiveness of information and communication technology in teaching Mathematics at Secondary level. Islandad. International Islamic University International journal of Academic research, 3(5), 67-72.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215