RESEARCH PAPER
Separate Exploration on the Development Path of Mixed Ownership System in China’s Educational Field
Junlong Chen 1, 2  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819, CHINA
2
School of Economics, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, 066004, CHINA
3
School of Administration, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, 066004, CHINA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Junlong Chen   

Associate professor, Doctor of economics, mainly engaged in mixed ownership economy research, +86 13383277689
Online publish date: 2017-10-11
Publish date: 2017-10-11
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(10):6891–6899
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Since the reform and opening-up, China’s education has been developing rapidly but facing many systematic problems. In the background of developing mixed ownership system actively, developing the mixed ownership system in educational field has significant realistic value in broadening the source of the educational funds, de-administration in educational field, introducing normative competition mechanism, breaking through the restriction of the public schools’ establishment and stimulating vitality of running a school. This paper uses the public theory to analyze the present status of development of mixed ownership in educational field and the problems of all kind of education, and discovery the development path of mixed ownership system, including classifying reform, improving relevant laws and regulations, breaking through the ideological fetter of all-or-none thinking, clearing ownership of property, clarifying the responsibility of each party, strengthening the pilot work and finally realizing the reunification of particularity and universality.
 
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Chen, L. T. (2017). Study on Practical Dilemma and Development Path of Mixed Ownership in Higher Vocational Colleges. China Higher Education Research, 1, 107-110.
 
2.
Dong, S. Z. (2016). Exploring “mixed ownership” in the education field: connotation, pattern and strategy. Exploring Educational Development, 3, 52-56.
 
3.
Liang, J., & Chen, E. L. (2017). Solution to the dilemma of high school education development and its path. Journal of Teaching and Management, 2, 8-11.
 
4.
Peng, M., & Zhu, D. Q. (2017). The Governance Dilemma, Logic and Path of Balanced Development of Compulsory Education. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 3, 45-49.
 
5.
Que, M. K., & Pan, Q. (2015). Initial exploration on development of mixed ownership vocational colleges. Vocational and Technical Education, 4, 40-44.
 
6.
Su, C. H. (2017). The Effects of Students’ Learning Anxiety and Motivation on the Learning Achievement in the Activity Theory Based Gamified Learning Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13, 1229-1258.
 
7.
Wang, Y. P. (2016). A Study on Kinmen Residents’ Perception of Tourism Development and Cultural Heritage Impact. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12, 2909-2920.
 
8.
Yang, X. J., & Li, Y. f. (2016). Existing problems in inclusiveness transition of private kindergartens. Journal of Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University, 6, 49-52.
 
9.
Yang, Y. (2017). Severe problems and test facing adult education in the new era. Continue education research, 2, 56-57.
 
10.
Yu, H. (2012). The lack of legal norms in transformed kindergarten and its countermeasures. Studies in Preschool Education, 7, 12-16.
 
11.
Zeng, X. D., & Liu, L. (2016). Analysis of Service Behavior of Different Ownership Kindergartens and Its Policy Implications. Studies in Preschool Education, 8, 14-23.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215