Students’ Utilization of Distance Learning through an Interventional Online Module Based on Moore Transactional Distance Theory
More details
Hide details
Faculty of Education, University Technology Malaysia, MALAYSIA
Online publish date: 2018-05-13
Publish date: 2018-05-13
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(7):3043–3052
Online learning platforms potentially increase student engagement and interactivity, thus contributing toward enhancing students’ satisfaction with distance learning. The main aim of this research is to investigate the efficacy of an interventional online module based on Moore transactional distance theory on students’ learning autonomy and satisfaction regarding the utilization of distance learning.

Materials and Methods:
An experimental design was conducted with a stratified random sample of 100 students (50 control and 50 intervention) from the University College of Applied Sciences, Palestine. Three tools were applied in this study: the DELES instrument, which was given to the intervention group, another validated tool that was given to the control group and an achievement test that was introduced to both groups. The intervention included educational and training sessions that were given in the environment of online learning after the student’s baseline assessment.

It was noted that there was a significance difference in the domain of instructor support before and after the intervention within the intervention group. It was also observed that there was no significant difference (NSD) in the mean scores for students’ collaboration and interaction, satisfaction and learning autonomy within the intervention group before and after the intervention. Moreover, there was NSD in mean scores for remembering, understanding or application among two groups (control and intervention) before and after the intervention, whereas it was a significant difference in the mean analysis score among the intervention and the control group before and after the intervention.

Ali, A. (2011). Key factors for determining students’ satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(2), 114-127.
Bell, B. S., & Fedeman, J. E. (2013). E-learning in postsecondary education. Future Child, 23(1), 165-185.
Bordelon, K. (2013). Perceptions of achievement and satisfaction as related to interactions in online courses (PhD dissertation), Northcentral University.
Bryant, J., & Bates, A. J. (2015). Creating a constructivist online instructional environment. TechTrends, 59(2), 17-22.
Choy, J, & Quek, C. (2016) Modelling relationships between students’ academic achievement and community of inquiry in an online learning environment for a blended course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4).
Ekwunife-Orakwue, K. C., & Teng, T. L. (2014). The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education, 78, 414-427.
Finch, D., & Jacobs, K. (2012). Online education: Best practices to promote learning. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics 56th Annual Meeting.
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gartner, S. (2014). Online Grading to Make Teaching Life Easier with Moodle. Learning Management Systems. Retrieved from
Gartner. (2012). Gamification: engagement strategies for business and IT. Report G00245563.
Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 5, 134–176.
Hanson, D., Maushak, N. J., Schlosser, C. A., Anderson, M. L., Sorenson, C., & Simonson, M. (1997). Distance education: Review of the literature (2nd Ed.). Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-24. Retrieved from
Jacobs, G. M., Renandya, W. A., & Power, M. (2016). Learner autonomy. In G. Jacobs, W. A. Renandya and M. Power (eds.), Simple, powerful strategies for student centered learning. New York: Springer International Publishing.
Judrups, J. (2015). Analysis of knowledge management and e-learning integration models. Procedia Computer Science, 43, 154-162.
Kirmizi, O. (2014). A study on the predictors of success and satisfaction in an online higher education program in Turkey. International Journal of Education, 6(4),
Language packs – Moodle Docs. (n.d.). Retrieved from
Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158–163.
Mahle, M. (2011). Effects of interactivity on student achievement and motivation in distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(3), 207-215.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. & Baki, M. (2013). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Structure. U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service.
Moodle Partners. (2016). Global Certified Service Providers. Moodle. Retrieved from
Moodle Partners. How do the Moodle Partners work? Retrieved from
Moore, M. G. (1983). The individual adult learner. In M. Tight (Ed.), Adult learning and education. London: Croom Helm.
Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education. New York: Routledge.
Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view. Toronto, ON: Nelson.
Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222–229.
Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: a review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2), 124-142.
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59–70.
Stanley, A. (2014). Technology that puts the classroom in students’ laptops. Retrieved from
Sutton, L. A. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223-242. Retrieved on October 17, 2017 from
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: a case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77-90.
Walker, S. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: the Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES). Learning Environ. Res., 8, 289.
Yang, J., Kinshuk, Yu, H., Chen, S.-J., & Huang, R. (2014). Strategies for smooth and effective cross-cultural online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 208-221.
Yu, Z. (2015). Indicators of satisfaction in clickers-aided EFL class. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 587,
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What Makes the Difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836–1884.
Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127-136.