RESEARCH PAPER
Technology for Teaching Students to Solve Practice-Oriented Optimization Problems in Mathematics
 
More details
Hide details
1
Vyatka State University, Kirov, RUSSIA
2
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
3
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, RUSSIA
4
RUDN University (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia), Moscow, RUSSIA
Publish date: 2018-07-22
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(10):em1605
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The transition to new educational standards puts forward the applied orientation of training school education. The universality of mathematical methods allows to reflect the connection of theoretical material of various fields of knowledge with practice on the level of general scientific methodology. Practice-oriented activity, as a manifestation of the content of the mathematics course of the secondary school, determines the importance of mathematics in preparing students for continuing education in the process of professional development. But at the same time there arises the need to stop understanding the educational activity only as a process of obtaining ready-made knowledge. The relevance of the problem is caused by the insufficiently developed method of teaching to solve practice-oriented optimization problems in the school course of mathematics as a means of strengthening its applied orientation. The purpose of the article is to develop and substantiate the technology of teaching students to solve practice-oriented optimization problems in the course of implementing the applied orientation of the mathematics course. The article discusses methodological aspects of organizing pupils’ training in mathematics, substantiates the need to use practice-oriented optimization problems in mathematics in secondary schools, suggests a set of tasks and considers various methods for solving practice-oriented optimization problems, and also reveals the specificity of solving problems of this type.
 
REFERENCES (52)
1.
Anthony, M., & Biggs, N. (1996). Mathematics for economics and finance. Methods and modeling. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
 
2.
Apanasov, P. G. (1975). Constructing a system of exercises with economic content in the course of mathematics in secondary schools (PhD Thesis). Moscow: NIISIMO APN USSR.
 
3.
Ashurov, M. M. (1990). Applied problems in the course of Algebra in the eight-year school: PhD Thesis. Baku: Azerbaijan Order of Labor Red Banner State Pedagogical Institute named after V.I. Lenin.
 
4.
Balk, M. B., & Petrov, V. A. (1986). On mathematization of problems arising in practice. Mathematics in school, 3, 55-57.
 
5.
Bock, W., & Bracke, M. (2015). Applied School Mathematics – Made in Kaiserslautern. Neunzert H., Prätzel-Wolters D. (eds) Currents in Industrial Mathematics. Berlin: Springer.
 
6.
Bondarentko, T. N. (2013). A functional model of effective practice-oriented learning in a higher educational institution. Internet-journal. Naukovodenie, 4, 1- 7.
 
7.
Bublikov, S. V. (2000). Methodological foundations of the variable construction of the content of teaching physics in high school (PhD Thesis). St. Petersburg: the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen.
 
8.
Collins, W., Dritsas L., Frey-Mason, P., Howard, A. C., McClain, K., Molina, D. D., Moore-Harris, B., Ott, J., Pelfrey, R. S., Price, J., Smith, B., & Wilson, P. S. (1999). Mathematics: Applications and Connections. Westerville: McGraw-Hill.
 
9.
Dalinger, V. A. (1996). On the content and methodological features of the course “Innovative processes in school mathematics education”. Bulletin of Omsk University. Issue 2. Omsk: publishing house of the OGPU (pp. 119 – 122).
 
10.
Dalinger, V. A. (2013). Contextual problems as a means of implementing the applied orientation of the school course of mathematics. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research, 10, 112 - 113.
 
11.
Dalinger, V. A., & Simonzhenkov, S. D. (2007). A collection of applied problems on extremum: a manual for students of schools and classes of mathematical profile. Omsk: OOO SIC “Sfera”.
 
12.
Davydov, V. V. (2004). Problems of developmental learning: Textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Moscow: Publishing Center “Academy”.
 
13.
El’konin, D. B. (1989). Selected psychological works. Moscow: Pedagogy.
 
14.
Erentraut, E. N. (2005). Practice-oriented problems as a means of implementing the applied orientation of the mathematics course in specialized schools: PhD Thesis. Ekaterinburg: the Ural State Vocational and Pedagogical University.
 
15.
Federal state educational standard of the basic General educations. (2013). Moscow: Education.
 
16.
Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmst....
 
17.
Geretschläger, R. (2017). The Rainbow of Mathematics – Teaching the Complete Spectrum and the Role Mathematics Competitions Can Play. Competitions for Young Mathematicians. London: Springer.
 
18.
Gubanova, A. A. (2001) Realization of intersubject connections of computer science and mathematics for the formation of students’ integral scientific outlook. Retrieved on January from http://www.ito.su/2001/ito/I/1....
 
19.
Guzeev, V. (1995). “Project method” as a special case of integrated learning technology. Head –master, 4, 39-47.
 
20.
Guzeev, V. V., & Bershadsky, M. E. (2003). Didactic and psychological foundations of educational technology. Moscow: Center for “Pedagogical Search”.
 
21.
Heymann, H. W. (2003). Mathematics Instruction from the Perspective of General Education. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
22.
Ivanova, T. A. (1989). Humanitarization of general mathematical education. N. Novgorod: publishing house of the National Pedagogical University.
 
23.
Kalugina, I. Yu. (2000). Educational opportunities for practice-oriented teaching students: PhD Thesis. Ekaterinburg: the Ural State Vocational and Pedagogical University.
 
24.
Khutorskoy, A. V. (2012). Metasubject content of education from the standpoint of humanity. In the Bulletin of the Institute of Human Education. Retrieved from https://eidos-institute.ru/jou....
 
25.
Kim, M. K., & Cho, M. K. (2015). Design and Implementation of Integrated Instruction of Mathematics and Science in Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 3-15.
 
26.
Kolyagin, Yu. M., & Pikan, V. V. (1985). On the applied and practical orientation of teaching mathematics. Mathematics in the school, 6, 26-32.
 
27.
Kvon, G. M., Lushchik, I. V., Karpenko, M. A., Zaitseva, N. A., Kulkov, A. A., Galushkin, A. A., & Yakupova, N. M. (2017). Regional investment policy: Analysis and assessment of the investment environment state. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(5), 835-853. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejac.....
 
28.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (NCTM). (2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.
 
29.
Pardhan, H., & Mohammad, R. F. (2005). Teaching Science and Mathematics for Conceptual Understanding? A Rising Issue. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmst....
 
30.
Pinsky, A. A. (2003). Profiling will not take anyone by surprise. Public education, 4, 79-83.
 
31.
Polisadov, C. C. (2014). Practice-based learning in higher education. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2, 23.
 
32.
Polyakov, V. A., & Kuznetsov, A. A. (2004). Scientific and methodological support of the development of Russian education. Moscow: Pedagogics, 5, 3-11.
 
33.
Rohlov, V. S. (2006). Method of educational projects in science education. Moscow: MIOO.
 
34.
Romanovskaya, M. B. (2006). The method of projects in educational process: a methodical guide. Moscow: Pedagogical Search.
 
35.
Samarskiy, A.A. & Mikhailov, A.P. (1997). Mathematical Modeling: Ideas. Methods. Examples. Moscow: Science.
 
36.
Sarantsev, G.I. (2002). Methods of teaching mathematics in high school. Moscow: Prosveschenye.
 
37.
Shahali, E. H., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’ interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, cience and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189-1211. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
38.
Shapiro, I. M. (1990). Using problems with practical content in teaching mathematics: Teacher’s book. Moscow: Prosveschenye.
 
39.
Shtepa, Yu. P. (2008). Solution of problems of forecasting and optimization in the school course of computer science. Informatics and education, 9, 39-46.
 
40.
Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 
41.
Solovieva, O. V. (2009). Applied orientation of teaching mathematics in middle school as a means of organizing preprofile training. Bulletin of the Pomor University. Series “Humanities and Social Sciences.” 6, 167-170.
 
42.
Tereshin, D. A. (2014). Methodical system of teaching geometry in classes of physical and mathematical profile based on a problem approach (PhD Thesis). Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University.
 
43.
The federal state educational standards of preschool education. (2013). Ministry of Education and Science of Russia No. 1155. (FSES). Retrieved from http://minobr.govmurman.ru/fil....
 
44.
Tumaikina, M. Yu. (2000). A problem approach in implementing the applied economic orientation in teaching mathematics (PhD Thesis). Novosibirsk: the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University.
 
45.
Vinokurova, N., & Episeeva, N. (1999). One of the ways to implement an integrative approach in teaching. Mathematics, 36, 2-3.
 
46.
Vozniak, G. M. (1990). Applied tasks in learning motivation. Mathematics in school, 2, 9-11.
 
47.
Xia, X., Lv, C., Wang, B., & Song, Y. (2016). Research on Mathematics Teaching Experiment of “Situated Creation and Problem-based Instruction” in Midle and Primary Schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
48.
Yaburova, E. A. (2006). Problems with practical content in the section “Electrodynamics” for the middle school: A manual for teachers of physics and students of ped. universities. Solikamsk: publishing house of the SSPI.
 
49.
Yakimanskaya, I. S. (2000). Technology of personality-oriented education. Moscow: September.
 
50.
Yalalov, F. G. (2008). Activity-competence approach to practice-oriented education. Higher education in Russia, 1, 89-93.
 
51.
Yaremko, N. N. (2013). The concept of criterial-correctness mathematical training of schoolchildren. Modern education: scientific approaches, experience, problems, prospects. Materials of the IX all-Russia. scientific-practical conference with intern. participation “Artemov Readings”. Penza: PSU, pp. 19-23.
 
52.
Zhmurova, I. Yu., & Generalova, A. A (2016). Optimization problems in the school course of mathematics. The young scientist, 14, 537-539.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215