SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER
The Views of Lecturers, Students and Administrators on the Impact of Organization in Foreign Language Education to Academic Achievement
 
More details
Hide details
1
Near East University, Department of Education, Nicosia, N. CYPRUS
Online publish date: 2017-11-21
Publish date: 2017-11-21
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):7865–7874
KEYWORDS
This article has been presented in ICES 2017 - International Conference on Environmental Sciences & Educational Studies. This article belongs to the special issue " Interdisciplinary Research on the Environmental Education, Educational Studies in Sustainability & Instructional Technologies and Designs".
ABSTRACT
The rapid development of technology from day to day has manifested itself also in the field of education, and therefore it has become compulsory to include new regulations in education. In this fast-paced development, technology is coming into prominence both in distance education and traditional education. In this context, the technological organization established has an important role in the emergence of success perception. Since computer has begun to be used in the field of education, in addition to traditional education, the distance education has become in a more effective and productive education for foreign language learners. In this study, the distance learning, traditional education, teaching environments and perception of organizing as academic achievement are explained. The study has been carried out in a private university in the academic year of 2016-2017. The aim of this study is to evaluate the perception of success between distance education and traditional education in the foreign language education. This study examined the perceptions of administrators, lecturers and students towards the distance learning and traditional learning in order to evaluate the academic success of organizing in foreign language learning. The qualitative data analysis was used in this study. Administrators and students reported that they were prepared to facilitate individual study and improve their work skills with distance learning in the foreign language learning, but that the lecturers were not in the same position with the administrators and students in distance education.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Alkan, C. (2005). Eğitim Teknolojisi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
 
2.
Arslan, M., & Eraslan, L. (2003). Yeni Eğitim Paradigması ve Türk Eğitim Sisteminde Dönüşüm Gerekliliği, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 160.
 
3.
Aydın, M. (1988). Eğitim Yönetimi. Ankara: Hatiboğlu Yayınevi, Çağ Matbaası.
 
4.
Bozavlı, E. (2017). Yeni Teknolojiler Işığında Eğitim Aktörlerinin Yabancı Dil Öğretiminde Sanal Sınıf Algıları. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(1), 347-358.
 
5.
Bozkaya, M., & Erdem Aydın, İ. (2011). Uzaktan öğrenenlerin bilgisayar ortamlı iletişime yönelik algılamaları. Anadolu Üniversitesi journal of social sciences, 11(2), 179-192.
 
6.
Chih-Cheng, L., Hsin-Jung, C., & Hsien-Sheng, H. (2011). EFL students’ perceptions of learning vocabulary in a computer-supported collaborative environment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 91-99.
 
7.
Ekmekçi, E. (2014). Distance education in foreign language teaching: evaluations from the perspectives of freshman students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176(2015), 390-397.
 
8.
Ergün, T., & Polatoğlu, A. (1992). Kamu Yönetimine Giriş. Ankara: T.O.D.A.İ.Yayınları. Sevinç Matbaası.
 
9.
Früh, W. (2001). Inhaltsanalyse. Theorie und praxis. 5., Überarbeitete Auflage. Uvk: Konstanz.
 
10.
Gürol, M., & Turhan, M. (2004). Yönetim Fonksiyonları Bağlamında Uzaktan Eğitim Yönetimi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET April 2005, 4(2).
 
11.
İşman, A., & Dabaj. F. (2005). Diffusion of distance education in North Cyprus. TOJDE, 6(4).
 
12.
Kaya, Z. (2002). Uzaktan Eğitim. Ankara: Pegem A Yayınevi.
 
13.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123-1134. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer–mediatedcommunication.
 
14.
Kikuchi, K. (2009). Listening to our learners’ voices: what demotivates Japanese high school students? Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 453-471. doi:10.1177/1362168809341520.
 
15.
Kim, K.-J. (2009). Motivational challenges of adult learners in self-directed E-learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(3), 317-335.
 
16.
Liu, X., Liu, S., Lee, S.-H., & Magjuka, R. J. (2010). Cultural differences in online learning: International student perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 177–188.
 
17.
Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to Social Research-Quantitative & Qualitative Approaches. London: Stage Pub.
 
18.
Şahin, A. (2004). Yönetim kuramları ve motivasyon ilişkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (11), 523-547.
 
19.
Sayadian, S., & Lashkarian, A. (2010). Investigating attitude and motivation of Iranian university learners toward English as a foreign language. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(1), 137-147 (Ertuğrul, 1999).
 
20.
Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Linan-Thompson, S., Reutebuch, C. K., Carlson, C. D., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Enhancing social studies vocabulary and comprehension for seventh-grade English language learners: Findings from two experimental studies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 297-324. doi:10.1080/19345740903167018.
 
21.
Weber, M. M. (2002). Measuring Supply Chain Agility in the Virtual Organizations. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics, 32(7), 577-590.
 
22.
Williams, P. (2000). Making Informed Decisions about Staffing and Training: Roles and Competencies for Distance Education Programs in Higher Education. Distance Learning Administration Conference, 2001. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distanc....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215