RESEARCH PAPER
Understanding Factors that Affecting Continuance Usage Intention of Game-Based Learning in the Context of Collaborative Learning
Ya-Ming Shiue 1
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Applied Informatics and Multimedia, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy of Science, Tainan, TAIWAN
2
Department of Public Relations and Advertising, Kun-Shan University, Tainan, TAIWAN
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Yu-Chiung Hsu   

Department of Public Relations and Advertising, Kun-Shan University, No.195, Dawan Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, Taiwan
Online publish date: 2017-09-24
Publish date: 2017-09-24
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(10):6445–6455
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Due to the rapid progress of information technology and the Internet generation of students now on campus, game-based learning (GBL) has become an important issue with regard to education. In addition, in an increasingly competitive work environment, students need to cultivate not only their own abilities, but also the ability to collaborate with colleagues after graduation. However, such collaboration needs to be directed by appropriate guidance in order to demonstrate the expected results, and the rules of the related game guide can be applied to achieve this. Therefore, it is of interest to analyse students’ learning processes in a digital game with a collaborative learning environment. In this study, we designed a digital history game providing collaboration opportunities for learners to solve problems. The partial least squares (PLS) approach was applied to analyse the effects of this collaboration on the attitude towards and willingness to use game learning, in order to validate our research model.
 
REFERENCES (47)
1.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
 
2.
Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
 
3.
Annetta, L. A. (2008). Video games in education: Why they should be used and how they are being used. Theory into Practice, 47, 229-239.
 
4.
Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of Learning Science, 12, 307-359.
 
5.
Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. C. (2003). Effectiveness of powerpoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education, 41(1), 77-86.
 
6.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation–confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
 
7.
Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., Schellens, T. (2010). Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Computers & Education, 54, 1145-1156.
 
8.
Chang, C. C., Liang C. Y., Chou, P. N., & Lin, G. Y. (2017). Is game-based learning better in flow experience and various types of cognitive load than non-game-based learning? Perspective from multimedia and media richness. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 218-227.
 
9.
Chen, C. H., & Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning preference and intrinsic motivation. Computers & Education, 55, 1021-1212.
 
10.
Chen, S. C., Yen, D. C., & Hwang, M. (2012). Factors influencing the continued intention to the usage of Web 2.0: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 933-941.
 
11.
Chen, Y. C. (2017). Empirical study on the effect of digital game-based instruction on students’ learning motivation and achievement. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3177-3187.
 
12.
Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation model analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical strategies for small sample research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
 
13.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
 
14.
Dickey, M. D. (2011). Murder on Grimm Isle: the impact of game narrative design in an educational game-based learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 456-469.
 
15.
Dorji, U., Panjaburee, P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2015). A learning cycle approach to developing educational computer game for improving students’ learning and awareness in electric energy consumption and conservation. Educational Technology and Society, 18(1), 91-105.
 
16.
Echeverrîa, A., Améstica, M., Gil, F., Nussbaum, M., Barrios, E., & Leclerc, S. (2012). Exploring different technological platforms for supporting co-located collaborative games in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1170-1177.
 
17.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
 
18.
Garcia, J. P., Cañadillas, I. P., Charterina, J. (2016). Business simulation games with and without supervision: An analysis based on the TAM mode. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1731-1736.
 
19.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Narrative Worlds, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
 
20.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., &Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
 
21.
Hwang, G. J., Chiu, L. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2015). A contextual game-based learning approach to improving students’ inquiry-based learning performance in social studies courses. Computers & Education, 81, 13-25.
 
22.
Hwang, Y. J., Al-Arabiat, M., Shin, D. H., & Lee, Y. H. (2016). Understanding information proactiveness and the content management system adoption in pre-implementation stage. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 515-523.
 
23.
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., & Robinson, L. (2008). Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings form Digital Youth project. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
 
24.
Kalyuga, S., & Plass, J. L. (2009). Evaluating and managing cognitive load in games. Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education. New York, NY: Information Science Reference.
 
25.
Kang, Y. S., Hong, S., & Lee, H. (2009). Exploring continued online service usage behavior: The roles of self-image congruity and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 111-122.
 
26.
Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Gameplaying for maths learning: cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 249-259.
 
27.
Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427-443.
 
28.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains from complex learning. Educational Psychology Review, 21. 31-42.
 
29.
Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continued intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54, 506–516.
 
30.
Liu, Y. C. & Huang, Y. M. (2015). Using the UTAUT Model to Examine the Acceptance Behavior of Synchronous Collaboration to Support Peer Translation. JALT CALL Journal, 11(1), 77-91.
 
31.
O’Donnell, A. M., & Kelly, J. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 321-349.
 
32.
Oghuma, A. P., Libaque-Saenz, C. F., Wong, S. F., Chang, Y. H. (2016). An expectation-confirmation model of continued intention to use mobile instant messaging. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 34-47.
 
33.
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.
 
34.
Pando-Garcia, J., Periañez-Cañadillas, I., Charterina, J. (2016). Business simulation games with and without supervision: An analysis based on the TAM model. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1731-1736.
 
35.
Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital GBL in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1-12.
 
36.
Pivec, M., & Kearney, P. (2007). Games for learning and learning from games. Informatica, 31, 419–423.
 
37.
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258-283.
 
38.
Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
 
39.
Riemer, V., & Schrader, C. (2015). Learning with quizzes, simulations, and adventures: Students’ attitudes, perceptions and intentions to learn with different types of serious games. Computers & Education, 88, 160-168.
 
40.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
41.
Sánchez, J. & Olivares, R. (2011). Problem solving and collaboration using mobile serious games. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1943-1952.
 
42.
Squire, K. (2006). From Content to Context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19-29.
 
43.
Stone, R. W., & Baker-Eveleth, L. (2013). Students’ expectation, confirmation, and continued intention to use electronic textbooks. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 984–990.
 
44.
Sung, H. Y., & Hwang G.J. (2013). A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education, 63, 43-51.
 
45.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995a). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
 
46.
Vasalou, A., Khaled, R., Holmes, W., & Gooch, D. (2017). Digital games-based learning for children with dyslexia: A social constructivist perspective on engagement and learning during group game-play. Computers & Education, 114, 175-192.
 
47.
Watson, W. R., Mong, C. J., & Harris, C. A. (2010). A case study of the in-class use of video game for teaching high school history. Computers & Education, 56(2), 466-474.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215