RESEARCH PAPER
Use of Tangible Materials and Computer in Mathematics Teaching: Opinions of School Principals
 
More details
Hide details
1
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara, TURKEY
2
Aksaray University, Faculty of Science and Letters, Aksaray, TURKEY
Online publish date: 2018-04-18
Publish date: 2018-04-18
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(6):2523–2532
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
School principals, who are responsible for all kinds of activities, should make necessary efforts in order to provide an effective learning environment. It is known that students usually have difficulties in visualizing abstract concepts in their minds and these difficulties are most often observed when teaching mathematics. Activating lessons for students by using tangible materials rather than abstract concepts will facilitate the teaching process considerably. The sample group of this study consisted of 184 school principals selected by the random sampling method from the school principals working in three provinces in the 2016-2017 academic year. All population lists of this study were accessed from the 2015-2019 Strategic Plans on the official website of Aksaray, Kahramanmaras and Mersin Provincial Directorates for National Education. The data collection tool of the study was the scale developed by the researchers of this study. The collected data were analyzed in line with the sub-problems of this study. The school principals reported that tangible materials should always be used and computers should be frequently used in mathematics lessons. It was concluded that the school principals would always support the purchase of tangible materials and they would often provide support for the programs and equipment required for computer use.
 
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Adiguzel, T., Gurbulak, N., & Sarıcayır, H. (2011). Smart boards and their instructional uses. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 15(8), 457-471.
 
2.
Akbayir, K. (2016). Primary school teachers’ views with regard to the use of the material in the mathematics lesson. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 4(33), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.....
 
3.
Akdemir, E. (2009). The investigation of the effects of using the smart board on the achievement of students in geography courses (Unpublished master’s thesis). Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak.
 
4.
Akinci, A., Kurtoglu, M., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2012). As a technology policy, the following must be done in order for the FATIH project to be successful: A case study. Academic Informatics12-XIV. Academic Informatics Conference, Usak University, Usak.
 
5.
Aktumen, M. (2002). The role of computer-assisted instruction in teaching letter expressions in elementary school 8th grade (Unpublished master’s thesis), University of Gazi, Ankara.
 
6.
Arikan, F., Aydogdu, M., Dogru, M., & Usak, M. (2006). The effect of computer-assisted learning students’ achievement in biology education. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 171, 177-187.
 
7.
Asnake, M., Kassahun, N., & Halgeyo, J. (2017). Mathematics teachers’ and principals’ perception and practice of continuous professional development (CPD) In Gedeo Zone, IASET: International Journal of Library & Educational Science, 3(1), 1-14.
 
8.
Aydin, M. K. (2012). The relationship between the strategic leadership actions of public and private primary school principals and the dimensions of organizational learning (Unpublished master thesis), Gazi University.
 
9.
Aydogdu Iskenderoglu, T., Turk, Y., & Iskenderoglu, M. (2016). Pre-service Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Awareness of Ability to Use Concrete Materials and Their Self-Efficacy in the Usage Thereof in Mathematics Education. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Journal of Education Faculty, 1 (39), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21764/Efd.2....
 
10.
Balci, A. (2005). Research in Social Sciences: Methods, Techniques, and Principles. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Academic Publication.
 
11.
Burtt, E. A. (2003). The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science. New York: Dover Publications.
 
12.
Buyukozturk, S. (2005). Data Analysis Handbook for Social Sciences: Statistics, Research Design, SPSS Practices, and Interpretation. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Academic Publication.
 
13.
Daghan, G., Kibar, P. N., Akkoyunlu, B., & Atanur-Baskan, G. (2015). Approaches and views of teachers and administrators related to the usage of interactive whiteboards and tablet PCs. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.16949/turco....
 
14.
Dienes, Z. (1967). A Theory of mathematics-learning. In F. J. Crosswhite, et al. (Eds.). (1973). Teaching mathematics: Psychology foundations. Worthington, OH: Charles A. Jones Pub. Co. Dienes.
 
15.
Dursun, O. O., Kuzu, A., Kurt, A. A., Gullupinar, F., & Gultekin, M. (2013). Views of School Administrators’ on FATIH Projects Pilot Implementation Process. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 3(1), 100-113.
 
16.
Fuson, K. C., & Briars, D. J. (1990). Using a base-ten blocks learning/teaching approach for first and second-grade place-value and multidigit addition and subtraction, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 180-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/749373.
 
17.
Haciomeroglu, G., & Apaydin, S. (2009). Environment and Area Account for Tangram Event. Elementary Education Online, 8(2), 1-6.
 
18.
Ibarra, L. N., Santillán, A. G., Salazar, O. C., & Leyva, J. A. (2017). Mathematics, Technology, and Learning: How to Align These Variables in Order to Explain Anxiety Towards Mathematics and Attitude Towards the Use of Technology for Learning Mathematics, Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6211-6229. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
19.
Karasar, N. (2014). Scientific research methods. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Publication.
 
20.
Kennedy, L. M., & Tipps, S. (1994). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.
 
21.
MoNE. (2013). Secondary school mathematics curriculum (5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade, Retrieved on 05.08.2017 from https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr.
 
22.
MoNE. (2014). Regulation on Administrative Assignment to Educational Institutions affiliated to the Ministry of National Education. Official Gazette (June 18, 2014, Issue 29034). Retrieved from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr.
 
23.
Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014....
 
24.
Nan, W. (1994). The effects of computer usage on elementary students’ attitudes, motivation, and achievement in mathematics, Ed.D (Dissertation Abstract International). Northern Arizona University.
 
25.
NIER. (1987). School mathematics: New ideas with computers. National Institute for Educational Research, pp. 46-47, Bangkok, Thailand.
 
26.
Piskin, M. (2010). Investigation of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about using concrete models in teaching mathematics (Unpublished master’s thesis), Middle East Technical University.
 
27.
Post, T. (1981). The Role of Manipulative Materials in the Learning of Mathematical Concepts. In Selected Issues in Mathematics Education (pp. 109-131). Berkeley, CA: National Society for the Study of Education and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
 
28.
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
29.
Tooke, D. J. (2001). Introduction. In D. J. Tooke & N. Henderson (Eds.), Using information technology in mathematics education. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v1....
 
30.
Toptas, V., Celik, S. & Karaca, E. T. (2012). Pedagogical materials use of primary grade teachers in mathematics education. Elementary Education Online, 11(4), 1121-1130. Retrieved on 20.06.2016 from http://ilkogretim-online.org.t....
 
31.
Tutak, T., Kilicarslan, S., Akgul, A., Guder, Y., & Ic, U. (2012). Determination of knowledge levels of elementary school mathematics teacher candidates for the use of concrete teaching object. X. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Nigde University, 27-30 Jun 2012, Nigde, Turkey.
 
32.
Unlu, M. (2017). Investigating mathematics teachers candidates’ knowledge about problem-solving strategies through problem posing, Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 218-236.
 
33.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., & Wolfe, R. G. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. New York, USA: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
34.
Van de Walle, J. A. (2007), Elementary and Middle School Mathematics. Teaching Developmentally (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson /Allyn and Bacon.
 
35.
Yenilmez, K., & Karakus, O. (2007). Opinions of elementary school and mathematics teachers on computer-aided mathematics teaching. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Journal of Education Faculty, 14, 87-98.
 
36.
Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara, Turkey: Seckin Publication.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215