RESEARCH PAPER
A Flipped Experience in Physics Education Using CLIL Methodology
 
More details
Hide details
1
“E. R. Caianiello” Physics Department, Univerity of Salerno, ITALY
2
“Leonardo Da Vinci” High School, Poggiomarino, ITALY
3
“P.E. Imbriani” High School, Avellino, ITALY
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Roberto Capone   

“E. R. Caianiello” Physics Department, Univerity of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano SA, Italy
Online publish date: 2017-09-16
Publish date: 2017-09-29
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(10):6579–6582
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Physics’ curricula of Italian Scientific High Schools in the last years have been enhanced by the introduction of Quantum Mechanics and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Education monitoring reveals that last year’s students are experiencing many issues in learning in their second language (L2) and advanced and counter-intuitive contents. Our experiment is aimed at understanding and then overcoming those problems using educational methodologies based on social aspects. Thanks to the Internet, a communicative style can be exploited where teachers could keep teaching, playing the role of semiotic mediators. Multimedia and simulations broadly available in MOOCS suggested a flipped classroom approach coping with the project of CLIL lessons. In our experience two classrooms of students were selected, starting from very similar performances and skills. The first one was taught with traditional lectures and tests; the second one, instead, attended to experimental lessons. Students could share their ideas and learning supports through a Facebook group, a blog, virtual classrooms and a website. Nevertheless, at the end of the experience an eTwinning exchange was planned, to spread the experiment towards foreign schools. The outcomes of the tests performed on the students were analysed and unexpected results were drawn. An extension to larger numbers of students, the introduction of different methodologies and the research about different topics in Physics could potentially develop this research.
 
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
 
2.
Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The chronicle of higher education, 12, 1-14.
 
3.
Bishop, J. L., & Matthew A. V. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA.
 
4.
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
 
5.
Crouch, C.H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970-977.
 
6.
Deslauriers, L., & Wieman, C. (2011). Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 7(1), 010101.
 
7.
Fitzpatrick, M. (2012). Classroom lectures go digital. The New York Times, June 24, 2012.
 
8.
Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66, 64-74.
 
9.
Lage, M.J., Platt, G.J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education 31, 30-43.
 
10.
Novak G, P. E.T., Gavrin, A.D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 
11.
Orzel, C. (Jul, 20 2015). Three Experiments That Show Quantum Physics Is Real, in Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/ch....
 
12.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 103-119.
 
13.
Roehl, A., Shweta, L. R., & Gayla, J. S. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences 105(2), 44.
 
14.
Singh, C., Belloni, M., & Christian, W. (2006). Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics. Physics Today, 59(8), 43.
 
15.
Tsaparlis, G., & Papaphotis, G. (2009). High‐school Students’ Conceptual Difficulties and Attempts at Conceptual Change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 895-930.
 
16.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1).
 
17.
Walvoord, B.E., & Anderson, V.J. (1998). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
18.
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686-688.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215