A Study of Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning under Environmental Education
Xue-Liang Pei 1, 2
Xiao-Li Man 3  
More details
Hide details
College of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, CHINA
East Business Management Research Centre, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, CHINA
School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, CHINA
School of economics and management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, CHINA
Online publish date: 2018-05-15
Publish date: 2018-05-15
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(7):3213–3223
Under the globalized and fiercely competitive external environment, manufacturers have to enhance the organizational learning capability to cope with the challenge of Environmental Education. In addition to developing and cultivating the knowledge management capability, manufacturers have to co-develop, share, and spread relevant knowledge among different bodies in the external network. The theoretical relationship among manufacturers’ knowledge management in global manufacturing network, knowledge management in supply chain network, and organizational learning capability is proposed in this study, and the moderation effect of Environmental Education is further discussed. Based on 2013 International Manufacturing Strategy Survey VI (IMSS VI) of 463 manufacturers in 22 countries and regions. The empirical research results are concluded as below. (1) Manufacturers’ knowledge management in global manufacturing network and knowledge management in supply chain network present remarkably positive effects on the organizational learning capability. (2) Manufacturers’ knowledge management in supply chain network shows mediation effects on the relationship between knowledge management in global manufacturing network and organizational learning capability. (3) Environmental Education reveals notable moderation effects on the relationship between manufacturers’ knowledge management in supply chain network and organizational learning capability.
1. Alegre, J. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315-326.
2. Arora, A., Arora, A. S., & Sivakumar, K. (2016). Relationships among supply chain strategies, organizational performance, and technological and market turbulences. International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(1), 206-232.
3. Ataseven, C., & Nair, A. (2017). Assessment of supply chain integration and performance relationships: a meta-analytic investigation of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 185(9), 252-265.
4. Barrett, H., Balloun, J., & Weinstein, A. (2009). How variation in management perceptions affects organizational performance. Quality and Quantity, 43(3), 451-461.
5. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Hutchinson Business Books, Boston, MA.
6. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Young, S. (2005). Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14(2), 227-248.
7. Brennan, L., Ferdows, K., Godsell, J., Golini, R., Keegan, R., Kinkel, S., Srai, J. S., & Taylor, M. (2015). Manufacturing in the world: where next? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(9), 1253-1274.
8. Camps, J., Oltra, V., Aldás-Manzano, J., Buenaventura-Vera, G., & Torres-Carballo, F. (2015). Individual performance in turbulent environments: the role of organizational learning capability and employee flexibility. Human Resource Management, 55(3), 363-383.
9. Chakravarty, A., Ferdows, K., & Singhal, K. (1997). Managing international operations versus internationalizing operations management. Production and Operations Management, 6(2), 100-101.
10. Chen, I. J., Paulraj, A., & Lado, A. A. (2004). Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22(5), 505-523.
11. Cheng, Y., Chaudhuri, A., & Farooq, S. (2016). Interplant coordination, supply chain integration, and operational performance of a plant in a manufacturing network: a mediation analysis. Supply Chain Management, 21(5), 550-568.
12. Cheng, Y., Farooq, S., & Johansen, J. (2015). International manufacturing network: past, present and future. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(3), 392-429.
13. Cheng, Y., Madsen, E. S., & Liangsiri, J. (2010). Transferring knowledge in the relocation of manufacturing units. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 3(1), 5-19.
14. Chew, W. B., Bresnahan, T. F., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Measurement, coordination and learning in a multiplant network. In R. S. Kaplan (Ed.), Measures for Manufacturing Excellence, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 129-162.
15. Childerhouse, P., & Towill, D.R. (2011). Arcs of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Research, 49(24), 7441-7468.
16. Davis, T. (1993). Effective supply chain management. Mit Sloan Management Review, 34(4), 35-46.
17. Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
18. Ferdows, K. (1989). Mapping international factory networks. In K. Ferdows (Ed.), Managing International Manufacturing, Elsevier Science, New York, NY.
19. Ferdows, K. (1997). Made in the world: the global spread of production. Production & Operations Management, 6(2), 102-109.
20. Ferdows, K., & Thurnheer, F. (2011). Building factory fitness. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(3), 916-934.
21. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71.
22. Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johanson, J. (2007). Managing the Embedded Multinational: A Business Network View. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
23. Gammelgaard, J., McDonald, F., Stephan, A., Tüselmann, H., & Dörrenbächer, C. (2012). The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance. International Business Review, 21(6), 1158-1172.
24. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (2005). The multinational corporation as an inter-organizational network. In S. Ghoshal & D. E. Westney (Eds), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills.
25. Golini, R., Caniato, F., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2017). Supply chain integration within global manufacturing networks: a contingency flow-based view. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(3), 34-352.
26. Hosseinnezhad, F. (2017). A Study of the New Environmental Paradigm Scale in the Context of Iran. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 1(2), 14.
27. Huang, G. Q., Zhang, A., & Liu, X. (2013). A supply chain configuration model for reassessing global manufacturing in china. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(5), 669-687.
28. Jerez-Gómez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 715-725.
29. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1), New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Kopnina, H., & Cocis, A. (2017). Testing Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes toward the Sustainable Development (EAATSD) Scale with Bachelor Students. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 2(1), 2.
31. Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., & Jayaram, J. (2005). Internal and external integration for product development: the contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision Sciences, 36(1), 97–133.
32. Lim, D., Moon, Y., Kim, K., & Lee, H. (2017). A Methodology for Searching and Allocating Enterprises in the Supply Chain by Using the Business Information Database and Trademark Rights Database. Science, Technology and Society, 22(3), 524-538.
33. Lyu, H., Wu, L., Fu, Z., & Xu, S. (2016). The effect of the interplay between business model design and organizational complexity on organizational adaptation. Chinese Journal of Management, 13(3), 374-384.
34. Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2011). Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 235-252.
35. Miltenburg, J. (2009). Setting manufacturing strategy for a company’s international manufacturing network. International Journal of Production Research, 47(22), 6179-6203.
36. Peng, C., & Meng, Y. (2016). Empirical study of manufacturing enterprise collaboration network: formation and characteristics. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 42(5), 9-62.
37. Peng, D. X., Verghese, A., Shah, R., & Schroeder, R. G. (2013). The relationships between external integration and plant improvement and innovation capabilities: the moderation effect of product clockspeed. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(3), 3-24.
38. Rudberg, M., & Olhager, J. (2003). Manufacturing networks and supply chains: an operations strategy perspective. Omega, 31(1), 29-39.
39. Rudberg, M., & West, M. B. (2008). Global operations strategy: coordinating manufacturing networks. Omega, 36(1), 91-106.
40. Ruggero, G., Deflorin, P., & Scherrer, M. (2016). Exploiting the potential of manufacturing network embeddedness: an om perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(12), 1741-1768.
41. Shi, Y., & Gregory, M. (1998). International manufacturing networks-to develop global competitive capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 16(2), 195-214.
42. Stan, M., & Puranam, P. (2017). Organizational adaptation to interdependence shifts: the role of integrator structures. Strategic Management Journal, 38(5): 1041-1061.
43. Swink, M., Narasimhan, R., & Wang, C. (2007). Managing beyond the factory walls: effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 148-164.
44. Vereecke, A., Dierdonck, R. V., & Meyer, A. D. (2006). A typology of plants in global manufacturing networks. Management Science, 52(11), 1737-1750.
45. Wang, Z., & Satow, T. (1994). Leadership styles and organizational effectiveness in Chinese-Japanese joint ventures. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 9(4), 31-36.
46. Wong, C. Y., Boon-Itt, S., & Wong, C. W. (2011). The contingency effects of Environmental Education on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 604-615.
47. Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen, W., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2011). The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1), 17-32.
48. Zhu, Q., Krikke, H., & Caniels, M. (2017). Supply chain integration: value creation through managing inter-organizational learning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(2), 488-507.