A Study on the Effect of Students’ Imagination by Utilizing the Creative Methods in Industrial Design Course
Yo Wen Liang 1
An Sheng Lee 2  
More details
Hide details
Department of visual Communication Design, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City, TAIWAN
Department of Wood-Based Materials and Design, National Chiayi University, Chiayi City, TAIWAN
Department of Design, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, TAIWAN
Department of Restaurant Management, Toko University, Pu-Tzu, TAIWAN
Publication date: 2018-07-22
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(10):em1606
The university students in departments of industrial design can perform quite well in design basis, practice courses, but their design thinking and imagination appear to be limited. The lack diversity and innovativeness may affect products they design. Therefore, incorporation of innovative theories and methods in design courses to stimulate students’ imagination to enhance their performance can be an area worth examining in order to improve current design education. The purpose of this study is to investigate theories and methods that can be adopted in industrial design curriculum planning to stimulate imagination and analyze the effects on students’ imaginations. Five experts, each with more than 10 years of experiences in industrial design, are invited to work with the research team to apply the contents of STEP Factors Analysis, Image Mind Map, TRIZ Method, Persona, and Scenario to design courses to be taught to second-year design class in a university for 18 weeks. There are 52 students and they are divided into two groups, 26 people each. The experimental group takes the courses designed to stimulate imagination and the control group the original courses. The experts use a 5-point Likert scale in which Vygotsky’s imagination indexes are adapted to record the imagination each week. The results show that the group of using creative methods has better imagination at different design stages.
Alexander, I. F., & Maiden, N. (2004). Scenarios, stories, use cases: through the systems development life-cycle. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Anderson, J., & Priest, C. (2017). Following John Hejduk’s Fabrications: on imagination and reality in the architectural design process. Architectural Research Quarterly, 21(2), 183-192.
Buzan, T. (2000). Use your head. New Jersey: BBC Books Press.
Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1999). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. New York: Plume.
Buzan, T., Griffiths, C., & Harrison, J. (2013). Modern mind mapping for smarter thinking. Cardiff Bay: Proactive Press.
Cagan, J., & Vogel, C.M. (2002). Creating breakthrough products: Innovation from product planning to program approval. New York: FT Press.
Caiman, C., & Lundegård, I. (2017). Young children’s imagination in science education and education for sustainability. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2017/9 Online, 1-19.
Calabria, T. (2004). An introduction to personas and how to create them. Retrieved from:
Chen, H. J. (2010). Buyology: Redesign the e-commerce service based on the user’s behavior (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Gomoll, K. (1990). Some techniques for observing users. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Goodwin, K. (2009). Designing for the digital age: how to create human-centered products and services. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference, Malmo.
Hollon, E. (2008). User personas: Tools for understanding (2nd). Seoul: Korea Technical Communication Association.
Hsu, C. H., Chang, S. H., & Lin, R. T. (2013). A design strategy for turning local culture into global market products. International Journal of Affective Engineering, 12, 275-283.
Hsu, J. W. (2008). A study of introducing TRIZ inventive principles into the concept development of product form (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve jobs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Kao, T. C. (2005). A preliminary study on the application of TRIZ to the idea development of industrial design (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lawson, B. R. (2006). How designers think (4th Edition). Oxford: Architectural Press.
Liang, K. C. (2008). The issues of project activities influencing design development. Taipei: WuNan.
Liang, K. C., Liang, Y. W., & Chen, R. P. (2012). Using STEP factor analysis exploring the opportunity gaps of green lighting products in kitchen space. Proceedings of 2012 Ming Chi University of Technology, Taipei.
Liang, K. C., Liang, Y. W., & Wu, R. Y. (2012). A study on innovation of green lighting application for dining room and kitchen via TRIZ. Proceedings of 2012 Ming Chi University of Technology, Taipei.
Liang, Y. W., Lee, A. S., & Liu, S. F. (2016a). A study on design-oriented demands of VR via ZMET-QFD model for industrial design education and students’ learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 12(5), 1205-1219.
Liang, Y. W., Lee, A. S., & Liu, S. F. (2016b). Optimal parameters of motorcycle instrument panels design for the elderly by using fuzzy logic. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 54, 106-118.
Lin, R.T., Xiao, M.T., & Tu, L.J. (2006). Creative learning for designing cultural products using scenario approach: a case study of Taiwan Aboriginal Garment. Proceedings of the Symposium on Design Academic Research Achievements, Taipei.
Madani, R., Moroz, A., Baines, E., & Makled, B. (2016). Realising a child’s imagination through a child-led product design for both two-dimensional and three-dimensional product. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology, 52(1-2), 96-117.
Meyer, G. C. (2016). Investigating a design validation process: How jurors handle criteria in a design competition. Journal of Design Research, 14(3), 203-218.
Moggridge, B. (2002). Interviews with interaction designers. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, London.
Mulder, S., & Yaar, Z. (2006). The user is always right: a practical guide to creating and using personas for the web. Berkeley: New Riders.
Noel, L. A., & Liub, T. L. (2017). Using design thinking to create a new education paradigm for elementary level children for higher student engagement and success. Design and Technology Education, 22(1), 1-12.
Norman, D. A., & Nielsen, J. (2010). Gestural interfaces: a step backward in usability. Magazine Interactions, 17(5), 46-49.
Smith, S. M., Kohn, N. W., & Shah, J. J. (2008). What you see is what you get: effects of provocative stimuli in creative invention. The International Workshop on Studying Design Creativity.
Techbang (2013). To understand the meaning of the design competition show: Taiwan often won the prize, but the great powers are not interested in these competition. Retrieved from
Verplank, B., Fulton, J., & Black, A., (1993). Observation and invention: The use of scenarios in interaction design. Tutorial Notes 18 CHI 93 and Interact 93.
Vogel, C. M., Cagan, J., & Boatright, P. (2005). The design of things to come. NJ: W.S. Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology. 42(1), 7-97.
Walden, S. E., Foor, C. E., Pan, R., Shehab, R. L., & Trytten, D. A. (2015). Leadership, management, and diversity: Missed opportunities within student design competition teams. Proceedings of 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle.
Willis, J. W. (2009). Constructivist instructional design: Foundations, models, and examples. Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
Yu, S. P. (2013). Visual-brainstorming research: industrial design sketch concept stage (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.