A Study on the Integration of ICT by EFL Teachers in Libya
More details
Hide details
Cyprus International University, Lefkosa, NORTHERN CYPRUS
Online publish date: 2018-04-26
Publish date: 2018-04-26
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(7):2787–2801
Given the high importance of adopting ICT into education for developmental purposes in the recent era, the present study is designed to investigate Libyan EFL teachers’ attitudes toward ICT adoption in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT). This study looked into attributes (proposed by Rogers, 1995) contributing to adopting ICT, and, more importantly, addressed the relevance of ICT to the socio-cultural context of Libya and adaptations that need to be made for successful adoption and use of ICT. The participants were selected based on availability. The study had a mixed-method design and both quantitative procedures (surveys) and qualitative procedures (interviews) were used to collect data. Both descriptive and interpretive approaches were utilized to analyze data. The analysis led to the identification of a series of problems which were classified into school-level, teacher-level, student level, and system level.
1. Abukhattala, I. (2016). The Use of Technology in Language Classrooms in Libya. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(4), 262-267.
2. Adopt. (2017). In Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary. Retrieved from
3. Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2014). Exploring factors related to primary school pupils’ ICT self-efficacy: A multilevel approach. ICT tools in Human Behavior, 41, 327-341.
4. Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. ICT tools & Education, 47(4), 373-398.
5. Al-Oteawi, S. M. (2002). The perceptions of Administrators and teachers in utilizing information technology in instruction, administrative work, technology planning and staff development in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation), Ohio University.
6. Andersson, A., & Gronlund, A. (2009). A conceptual framework for e-Learning in developing countries: A critical review of research challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38, 1-16.
7. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefalla, S. (2007). The ICT Impact Report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. Retrieved from
8. Becta. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Retrieved on June 10, 2010 from
9. Becta. (2006). Learning platform functional requirements, conventry: Becta.
10. Becta. (2008). Harnessing Technology: Schools Survey 2008. Retrieved on October 20, 2011 from
11. Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and adoption of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136-155.
13. Chen, C. H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology adoption? The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65-75.
14. Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London: Kogan Page.
15. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209, 240.
16. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method (Vol. 19). New York: Wiley.
17. Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? ICT tools & Education, 51(1), 187-199.
18. Dunbar, R. (1991). Adapting distance education for Indonesians: Problems with learner heteronomy and a strong oral tradition. Journal of Distance Education, 12(2), 163-174.
19. Gordon, L. S. (2008). A preliminary investigation of disability awareness in the curriculum and teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion in New York State elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Hamdy, A. (2007). ICT in education in Libya. Libya Country Report. Retrieved on September 10, 2016 from
21. Hatlevik, O. E., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2015). Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self-efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence. ICT tools & Education, 81, 345-353.
22. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational technology research and development, 55(3), 223-252.
23. Hismanoglu, M. (2012). Prospective EFL teachers’ perceptions of ICT adoption: A study of distance higher education in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 185-196.
24. Hsu, L. (2016). Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: A partial least square approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1287-1297.
25. Hu, P. J. H., Clark, T. H. K., & Ma, W.W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41, 227–241.
26. Huwail, N., Sharhan, S., & Hunaiyyan, A. (2007). Learning design for a successful blended e-learning environment: Cultural dimensions. INFOCOMP Journal of Computer Science, 6(4), 60-69.
27. Johnson, D. G. (2004). Information technology and the goals of education: making nails for the hammer. In Johnson, D.G. (Ed.). Ethical, psychological and societal problems of the application of ICTs in education (pp. 34-41). Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.
28. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
29. Keller, J. (2000). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach. Florida State University.
30. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2006). Adaptation for a changing environment: Developing learning and teaching with information and communication technologies. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 7(2), 1-15.
31. Korte, W. B., & Husing, T. (2007). Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006: Results from Head teacher and a classroom surveys in 27 European countries. E-learning papers, 29(10), 1-6.
32. Lawless, K., & Pellegrino, J. (2007). Professional development in adopting technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614.
33. Li, N. (2002). Culture and gender aspects of students’ information searching behavior using the Internet: a two-culture study of China and the United Kingdom (Doctoral Dissertation), Open University United Kingdom. ProQuest Digital Dissertations.
34. Liaw, S., Huang, H., & Chen, G. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. ICT tools & Education, 49, 1066-1080.
35. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative inquiry, 1(3), 275-289.
36. Liu, J. (2009). A survey of EFL learners’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 101-106.
37. Martins, C., Steil, A., & Todesco, J. (2004). Factors influencing the adoption of the Internet as a teaching tool at foreign language schools. ICT tools & Education, 42(4), 220-237.
38. Meleisea, E. (2007). The UNESCO ICT in Education Programme: Bangkok: UNESCO.
39. Mingaine, L. (2013). Skill challenges in adoption and use of ICT in public secondary schools, Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(13), 61-72.
40. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
41. Nneji, B. U. (2014). Technologies in Education and the Dehumanization and Imperialization of Pedagogy: The African Perspective. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 8(1), 86-105.
42. Osei, C. D., Larbi, E., & Osei-Boadu, Y. (2014). Multidimensional barriers to information and communication technology adoption among senior high school teachers in Ghana. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 389-396.
43. Peralta, H., Costa, F.A. (2007). Teachers’ competence confidence regarding the use of ICT. Educational Science Journal, 3, 75-84.
44. Rhema, A., & Miliszewska, I. (2010). Towards e-learning in higher education in Libya. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 7(1), 423-437.
45. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (1st Ed.). New York: The Free Press.
46. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (4th Ed.). New York: The Free Press.
47. Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students’ ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. ICT tools & Education, 102, 103-116.
48. Sarfo, F. K., & Ansong-Gyimah, K. (2010). The perceptions of students, teachers, and educational officers in Ghana on the role of computer and the teacher in promoting the first five principles of instruction. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 85-95.
49. Sheingold, K. (1991). Restructuring for learning with technology: the potential for synergy. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 17-27.
50. Thomas, R. M. (1987). Computer technology: an example of decision-making in technology transfer. In R. M. Thomas, & V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Educational technology – its creation, development and cross-cultural transfer (pp. 25–34). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
51. Thompson, A. D., & Mishra, P. (2007). Editors' Remarks: Breaking News: TPCK Becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38-64.
52. Tri, D. H., & Nguyen, N. H. T. (2014). An exploratory study of ICT use in English language learning among EFL university students. Teaching English with Technology, 14(4), 32-46.
53. Underwood, J. D. M. (2006). Academic dishonesty in tests and examinations. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
54. Usluel, Y. K., Askar, P., & Bas, T. (2008). A structural equation model for ICT usage in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 262-273.
55. Watson, G., Proctor, R. M., Finger, G., & Lang, W. (2005). Education students’ views on the adoption of ICT into their undergraduate learning experiences. In Proceedings of the Effective Teaching and Learning Conference 2004. Griffith Institute for Higher Education.
56. Yılmaz, C. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of self-efficacy, English proficiency, and instructional strategies, Social Behavior and Personality, 39(1), 91-100.
57. Yuen, A. H., & Ma, W. W. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-243.
58. Zhou, L. (2003). Something can be done in public English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3, 224-226.