RESEARCH PAPER
Ability Training in Educational Model of Feasibility Study Studio
Yifan Pan 2  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, CHINA
2
School of Design & Environment, National University of Singapore, SINGAPORE
3
Library, Nankai University, Tianjin, CHINA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Yifan Pan   

School of Design & Environment, National University of Singapore, SINGAPORE
Online publish date: 2017-10-04
Publish date: 2017-10-04
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(10):6761–6766
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper proposed a training system in the educational model of feasibility study studio considering feedback mechanism based on the learning process and knowledge bank. System dynamic theory was used to analyze information feedback between undergraduates and teachers as well as among undergraduates. Positive feedback stimulates and negative feedback inhibits practical ability improvement in the studio educational model. An initial function with dynamic features was established according to the feedback mechanism, the function’s differential equation was solved to get the general solution. An “S” curve demonstrates the trend of practical ability training performance in educational model of feasibility study studio. The formation process of the “S” curve was explained. At last, some methods running the studio were proposed to elongate positive feedback and improve practical ability training performance in the educational model. This paper established the ability training pattern educational model of feasibility study studio and realized the integration of modules and platforms with theoretical knowledge as the inputs and practical abilities as the outputs.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Alizadeh, T., Tomerini, D., & Colbran, S. (2017). Teaching planning studios: an online assessment task to enhance the first year experience. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37(2), 234–245. doi:10.1177/0739456X16647162.
 
2.
Chiaradia, A. J. F., Sieh, L., & Plimmer, F. (2017). Values in urban design: a design studio teaching approach. Design Studies, 49(C), 66-100. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.10.002.
 
3.
Fasli, M., & Hassanpour, B. (2017). Rotational critique system as a method of culture change in an architecture design studio: urban design studio as case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 194–205. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1174142.
 
4.
Gingerich, C. (2016). Possibilities, opportunities and entrepreneurship: taking creativity beyond the studio. Mtna E-journal, November 2016, 17-19.
 
5.
Greer, K. (2016). Undergraduate studio art information use a multi-school citation analysis. Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 35(2), 230-240. doi:10.1086/688725.
 
6.
Hsiao, H.-S., Chen, J.-C., Hong, J.-C., Chen, P.-H., Lu, C.-C., & Chen, S. Y. (2017). A five-stage Prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based Learning Model to improve Students’ Learning Performance in Science Courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3393-3416. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00735a.
 
7.
Huang, Q. L., Li, B. M., & Ren, Y. Q. (2016). Empirical study on depth of online discussion in teachers workshops _ a case analysis of teachers workshop of ICT competency enhancement project. E-Education Research, 37(12), 121-128. doi:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2016.12.018.
 
8.
Ji, Y. C. (2017). An investigation of design studio performance in relation to creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 67–78. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.006.
 
9.
Kilinc, A., Demiral, U., & Kartal, T. (2017). Resistance to dialogic discourse in ssi teaching: the effects of an argumentation-based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 764–789. doi:10.1002/tea.21385.
 
10.
Knaub, A. V., Foote, K. T., Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Beichner, R. J. (2016). Get a room: the role of classroom space in sustained implementation of studio style instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, December 2016, 3(8), 1-22. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0042-3.
 
11.
Lin, M. T.-Y., Wang, J.-S., Kuo, H.-M., & Luo, Y. (2017) A Study on the Effect of Virtual Reality 3D Exploratory Education on Students’ Creativity and Leadership. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3151-3161. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00709a.
 
12.
Liao, X. M. (2017). Promoting autonomic learning of undergraduate through learning community model _ based on the studio of learning guidance in Wenhua College. China Higher Education Research, (1), 91-94. doi:10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2017.01.18.
 
13.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Vinit Mukhija, V. (2016). Responding to informality through urban design studio pedagogy. Journal of Urban Design, 21(5), 577–595. doi:10.1080/13574809.2015.1071650.
 
14.
O’Dwyer, A., & Childs, P. E. (2017). Who says Organic Chemistry is Difficult? Exploring Perspectives and Perceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3599-3620. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00748a.
 
15.
Puccinelli, E. (2016). Thoughts and tools for team building in the studio. Journal of Singing, 73(2), 215-218.
 
16.
Rodriguez, C., Hudson, R., & Niblock, C. (2016). Collaborative learning in architectural education: Benefits of combining conventional studio, virtual design studio and live projects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1-17. doi:10.1111/bjet.12535.
 
17.
Soliman, A. M. (2017). Appropriate teaching and learning strategies for the architectural design process in pedagogic design studios. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(2), 204-217. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2017.03.002.
 
18.
Tsai, F. (2017) An Investigation of Gender Differences in a Game-based Learning Environment with Different Game Modes. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3209-3226. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00713a.
 
19.
Wang, X. C., Liao, J. S., Wang, X. M., & You, Z. W. (2016). Inspiring form of group innovation in the teaching of design workshops. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition), 18(5), 102-108.
 
20.
Wu, Y., Li, X. Q., & Xia, D. (2012). The research on the feedback mechanism of communication management in knowledge innovation process in research team. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 29(1), 7-10.
 
21.
Yan, L., Chen, Y. W., & Deng, J. J. (2016). Research on implementation mode of studio practice teaching based on question standards. Modern University Education, (5), 94-103.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215