An Analysis of the Orientation and Emphasis of Intended Grade-10 Chemistry Curricula as Represented in Textbooks from Different Chinese Communities
Xiaoge Chen 1  
Mei-Hung Chiu 2
More details
Hide details
University of Bremen, Dept. of Biology and Chemistry, Institute for Science Education (IDN) - Chemistry Education, GERMANY
National Taiwan Normal University, Graduate Institute of Science Education, TAIWAN
Publication date: 2018-12-10
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(2):em1663
This study presents an analysis of the representation of intended curricula in 10th grade chemistry textbooks from different Chinese communities, namely from the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, and the Chinese minority in Malaysia. The study aims to identify the commonalities and differences among seven textbooks concerning the emphasis and orientation of the intended curriculum. It also looks at any indications of how student-oriented these curricula are in terms of the presentation of content and the suggested activities. The findings indicate that the Taiwanese textbooks have a high degree of contextualization and socio-scientific issues orientation, supported by rich and colorful illustrations as well as the integration of macro- and submicroscopic aspects of chemistry concepts. The textbook from Malaysia uses a quite traditional approach. It basically follows a structure-of-the-discipline orientation, using less contextualization and fewer illustrations. The textbooks from the People’s Republic of China lie somewhere in between the textbooks from Taiwan and Malaysia. They offer some indications of student-oriented learning and have some extent of daily life and socio-scientific issues orientation.
Childs, P. E., Hayes, S. M., & O’Dwyer, A. (2015). Chemistry and everyday life: relating secondary school chemistry to the current and future Lives of students. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education (pp. 33-54). Rotterdam: Sense.
Chiu, M.-H. (Ed.). (2016). Science education research and practices in Taiwan. Dordrecht: Springer.
Choi, B.-S., & Choi, A. (2016). Overview of science education research and practice in Korea. In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia (pp. 245-273). Dordrecht: Springer.
De Jong, O. (2006). Making chemistry meaningful: conditions for successful context-based teaching. Educación Química, 17, 215–226.
Devetak, I., & Vogrinc, J. (2013). The criteria for evaluating the quality of the science textbooks. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks (pp. 3-15). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ding, B. P. (2010). On the typologies and essential characteristics of inquiry-oriented science teaching. Educational Research, 2010(10), 81-85.
Dong Zong (2017). The background of Dong Zong’s establishment. Retrieved on June 30, 2018, from
Eilks, I., Rauch, F., Ralle, B., & Hofstein, A. (2013). How to allocate the chemistry curriculum between science and society. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry–A studybook (pp. 1-36). Rotterdam: Sense.
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of context in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976.
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.
Guo, C.-J., & Chiu, M.-H. (2016). Opportunities and challenges for science education in Asia: Perspectives based on the Taiwan experience. In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia (pp. 175-196). Dordrecht: Springer.
Halim, L., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2016). Science education research and practice in Malaysia. In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia (pp. 71-93). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: a pedagogical justification and the state of the art in Israel, Germany and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1459-1483.
Hofstein, A., & Kesner, M. (2015). Learning from and about Industry for Relevant Chemistry Education. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education (pp. 285-299). Rotterdam: Sense.
Holman, J. (1987). Resources or courses? Contrasting approaches to the introduction of industry and technology to the secondary curriculum. School Science Review, 68(244), 432-438.
Huang, D. S. (2010). Basic Chemistry 1 (1st ed.). Taiwan: LungTeng Culture Co., Ltd.
Huang, F. Q. (2004). Curriculum reform in contemporary China: seven goals and six strategies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 101-115.
Hu, J. H., & Wang, L. (2005). Scientific teaching exploration - an inquiry-based constructive teaching. Education Science Research, 2005(4), 35-37.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83.
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing domain. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701-705.
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry-logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 9-15.
Karpudewan, M., & Chua, K. E. (2016). Cultural background and the science laboratory learning environment: The Malaysian lower secondary students’ perspective. In I. Eilks, S. Markic & B. Ralle (Eds.), Science education research and practical work (pp. 93-104). Aachen: Shaker.
Khaddoor, R., Al-Amoush, S., & Eilks, I. (2017). A comparative analysis of the intended curriculum and its presentation in 10th grade chemistry textbooks from seven Arabic countries. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18, 375-385.
King, D. (2012). New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51-87.
Liu, C. K., & Chiu, M. -H. (2012). Review and prospect of the development of our secondary school science curriculum over the past century. Science Education Monthly, 347, 2-20.
Liu, H. X. (2010). Centennial changes of basic education in Taiwan. Education and Examination, 2010(6), 88-93.
Liu, X., Liang, L. L., & Liu, E. (2012). Science education research in China: challenges and promises. International Journal of Science Education, 34(13), 1661-1670.
MICSS. (1996). Upper secondary school chemistry (1st ed.), Malaysia: United Chinese School Committees’ Association of Malaysia (Dong Zong).
Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphases” in science education. Science Education, 66(2), 243-260.
Roseman, J. E., Stern, L., & Koppal, M. (2010). A method for analyzing the coherence of high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 47-70.
Seligardi, R. (2006). Views of chemistry and chemical theories: A comparison between two university textbooks in the Bolognese context at the beginning of the 19th century. Science & Education, 15, 713-737.
Shehab, S. S., & BouJaoude, S. (2017). Analysis of the chemical representations in secondary Lebanese chemistry textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 797-816.
Sjöström, J., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I. (2015). Chemistry education for sustainability. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education (pp. 163-184). Rotterdam: Sense.
Song, X. Q. (Ed.). (2007a). Chemistry 1 (3rd ed.). Beijing: People Education Press.
Song, X. Q. (Ed.). (2007b). Chemistry 2 (3rd ed.). Beijing: People Education Press.
Stein, M., Stuen, C., Carnine, D., & Long, R. M. (2001). Textbook evaluation and adoption. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 17(1), 5-23.
Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1-34.
Sun, Y. Q., Xu, D. F., Zhang, F. S., & Zhao, C. X. (Eds.). (2016). 25 Years of Shanghai curriculum reform, Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: the many faces of the chemistry “triplet”, International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179-195.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (Eds.). (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Van Berkel, B. (2005). The structure of current school chemistry – a quest for conditions for escape. Utrecht: CD-β.
Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2007). The relationship between teachers’ general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 156–171.
Wang, L. (Ed.). (2007a). Chemistry 1 (3rd ed.). Shandong: Shandong Science and Technology Press.
Wang, L. (Ed.). (2007b). Chemistry 2 (3rd ed.). Shandong: Shandong Science and Technology Press.
Wang, L. (2010). Basic chemistry education curriculum reform progress and reflection in the past years (Volume I). Chinese Journal of Chemical Education, 31(4), 15-21.
Wang, L., Zhu, Y. J., Jiang, Y. X., Wei, R., Zhou, Y., Guo, Y. Y., Wei, X., Yang, W. Y., & Liu E. S. (2016). Science education research in mainland China. In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.). Science education research and practice in Asia (pp. 17-39). Dordrecht: Springer.
Wang, S. H., & He, C. X. (2012). The comparison of “chemical reaction rate” content represented in different high school chemistry textbooks. Teaching and Learning Reference for Middle School Chemistry, 2012(4), 40-43.
Wang, Z. H. (Ed.). (2014). Chemistry 1 (6th ed.). Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Press.
Wang, Z. H. (Ed.). (2015). Chemistry 2 (6th ed.). Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Press.
Wang, W. J., Wang J. Y., Zhang G. Z., Lang Y., & Mayer V. J. (1996). Science education in the People’s Republic of China. Science Education, 80(2), 202-223.<203::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-K.
Xiong, Z. D., & Chen, J. C. (2001). A brief history of the evolution of science education in primary and secondary schools in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 1-6.
Yao, Z. P. (Ed.). (2007a). Chemistry Volume 1 (1st ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers.
Yao, Z. P. (Ed.). (2007b). Chemistry Volume 2 (1st ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers.
Yeh, M. C. P. (Ed.). (2010). Basic Chemistry 1 (1st ed.). Taiwan: Nan I Book Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Zhong, X. M. (2005). Challenge and development. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 25(8), 79-83.