RESEARCH PAPER
Case Study on Mathematics Pre-service Teachers’ Difficulties in Problem Posing
Albert Mallart 1, 2  
,  
Vicenç Font 2
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Princep de Girona High School, Barcelona, SPAIN
2
Barcelona University, Faculty of Education, Dept. of Mathematics Education, Barcelona, SPAIN
Online publish date: 2018-01-21
Publish date: 2018-01-21
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(4):1465–1481
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This research is presented in a way that provides useful knowledge for successful problem posing by mathematics pre-service teachers. We present a review of the concept of mathematical creativity (by different authors) and review studies that underline the relevance of problem posing in teaching mathematics, studies that consider problem posing a way to identify students’ learning patterns and to test them, and studies that relate mathematical competences to problem posing. Participants in the study were 10 pre-service teachers who were successful in problem solving. Data were gathered through qualitative techniques: classroom observations, sequences of tasks, questionnaires, student focus groups and discussion. The case study illustrated some of pre-service teachers’ difficulties in problem posing: creating problems that students recognize as relevant to their everyday lives, problems adapted to the school curriculum at a specific educational level, and problems that can be self-corrected.
 
REFERENCES (37)
1.
Abrantes, P. (1996). El papel da la resolución de problemas en un contexto de innovación curricular. Uno, 8, 7-18.
 
2.
Akay, H., & Boz, N. (2010). The Effect of Problem Posing Oriented Analyses-II Course on the Attitudes toward Mathematics and Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Elementary Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.....
 
3.
Bahar, A., & June, C. (2015). Cognitive Backgrounds of Problem Solving: A Comparison of Open-ended vs. Closed Mathematics Problems. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1531-1546. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
4.
Bardin, L. (1986). El análisis de contenido. Madrid: Akal.
 
5.
Bransford, J., & Stein, B. (1986). Solución ideal de problemas. Barcelona: Editorial Labor.
 
6.
Breda, A., Pino-Fan, L., & Font, V. (2017). Meta Didactic-Mathematical Knowledge of Teachers: Criteria for the Reflection and Assessment on Teaching Practice. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1893-1918. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
7.
Brown, S., & Walter, M. (1993). Problem posing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
8.
Cunningham, R. (2004). Problem posing: An opportunity for increasing student responsibility. Mathematics and Computer Education, 38(1), 83-89.
 
9.
Chamberlin, S. A. (2005). Secondary mathematics for high-ability students. In F.Dixon & S. Moon (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (145– 163). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
 
10.
Ellerton, N. (1986). Children’s made up mathematics problems- A new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0030....
 
11.
English, L. (1997). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(3), 183-217. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002....
 
12.
Espinoza, J. (2011). Invención de problemas aritméticos por estudiantes con talento matemático: Un estudio exploratorio. Memoria de Tercer Ciclo. Granada: Editorial de la Universidad de Granada.
 
13.
Espinoza, J., Lupiáñez, J. L., & Segovia, I. (2014). La invención de problemas y sus ámbitos de investigación en educación matemática. Revista digital Matemática, Educación e Internet, 14(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.18845/rdmei....
 
14.
James, V., Lederman, R., & Vagt-Traore, B. (2004). Enhancing creativity in the classroom. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, (104-114). Switzerland: Jacobs Foundation.
 
15.
Kesan, C., Kaya, D., & Güvercin, S. (2010). The Effect of Problem Posing Approach to the Gifted Student’s Mathematical Abilities. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(3), 677- 687.
 
16.
Kwek, M. L., & Lye, W. L. (2008). Using problem-posing as an assessment tool. In 10th Asia-Pacific Conference on Giftedness. Singapore. Retrieved on June 1, 2010 from http://hkage.org.hk/en/events/....
 
17.
Leung, S., & Silver, E. (1997). The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0321....
 
18.
Lin, P. (2004). Supporting teachers on designing problem-posing tasks as a tool of assessment to understand students’ mathematical learning. In M. J. Høines, & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3 (257–264). Bergen: Bergen University College.
 
19.
Malaspina, U., Mallart, A., & Font, V. (2015). Development of teachers’ mathematical and didactic competencies by means of problem posing. In CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, (2861-2866). Praga: Charles University in Prague and ERME.
 
20.
Mallart, A., & Deulofeu, J. (2017). Estudio de indicadores de creatividad matemática en la resolución de problemas. RELIME. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 20(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.12802/relim....
 
21.
Mallart, A., Font, V., & Malaspina, U. (2016). Reflexión sobre el significado de qué es un buen problema en la formación inicial de maestros. Perfiles Educativos, 38(152), 14-30.
 
22.
Mann, E. (2006). Creativity: the essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30 (2), 236-260. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-20....
 
23.
Milinkovié, J. (2015). Conceptualizing Problem Posing via Transformation. In J. Cai, N. Ellerton, & F.M. Singer (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice, (47-70). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
 
24.
Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1998). Learning through problem solving. In A. Olivier, & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1(169-185). Stellenbosch: PME.
 
25.
Pásztor, A., Molnár, G., & Csapó, B. (2015). Technology-based assessment of creativity in educational context: the case of divergent thinking and its relation to mathematical achievement. Thinking skills and Creativity, Special Issue: 21st Century Skills, 18, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.....
 
26.
Pelczer, I., & Gamboa, F. (2008). Problem posing strategies of mathematically gifted students. In R.Leikin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students (193-199). Tel Aviv: Center for Educational Technology.
 
27.
Polya, G. (1979). Cómo plantear y resolver problemas. México: Trillas.
 
28.
Silver, E. A. (1994). On Mathematical Problem Posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28.
 
29.
Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (2005). Assessing students’ mathematical problem posing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 129-135.
 
30.
Silver, E., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 521-539. https://doi.org/10.2307/749846.
 
31.
Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness & creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2....
 
32.
Sriraman, B. (2009). General Creativity. In B. Kerr (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Giftedness, Creativity and Talent, (369-372). New York: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/978141....
 
33.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (2000). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (93–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
 
34.
Tichá, M., & Hošpesová, A. (2013). Developing Teachers’ Subject Didactic Competence through Problem Posing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
35.
Walter M., & Brown, S. (1977). Problem posing and problem solving: an illustration of their interdependence. Mathematics Teacher, 70(1), 5-13.
 
36.
Wang, M. C., Peverly, S. T., & Catalano, R. (1987). Integrating special needs students in regular classes: Programming, implementation, and policy issues. Advances in special education, 6, 119-149.
 
37.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215