RESEARCH PAPER
Children’s Engineering Design Thinking Processes: The Magic of the ROBOTS and the Power of BLOCKS (Electronics)
 
More details
Hide details
1
Monash University, AUSTRALIA
2
University College London, UNITED KINGDOM
3
The Arctic University of Norway, NORWAY
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Sarika Kewalramani   

Monash University, AUSTRALIA
Online publication date: 2020-01-01
Publication date: 2020-01-01
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2020;16(3):em1830
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
This paper presents findings from an on-going international study of Early Childhood (EC) teachers’ and children’s use of internet-connected toys (IoToys) to understand possibilities for developing children’s cognitive capacities (e.g., creativity, inquiry, engineering design thinking).

Material and methods:
The study employed a Design Based Research (DBR) method, where teachers intentionally plan and deliver technologically constructed Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) experiences for preschoolers. Using Australia as a case study, data collection involved participant observation of three teachers’ and 17 children’s technology constructed play experiences with robotic toys, littleBits electronic magnetic blocks, alongside pre and post semi-structured interviews with teachers and children’s photo voice sessions were video recorded.

Results:
Analysing the findings using embodied cognition theory showed that the teachers, although novice in their own technological pedagogical knowledge engaged children's play with the robotic toys, and co-learn with the children. Integration of STEM-focused playful experiences supported children’s scientific inquiry, design thinking and creativity as well as vocabulary targeted at interdisciplinary STEM concepts.

Conclusions:
With the ever increasing focus on developing children’s 21st century skills, this study recommends engineering habits of mind, creativity and inquiry dispositions should now be taken into account in teaching and learning situations with young children and to develop STEM engagement.

 
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Akerson, V.L., Buck, G.A., Donnelly, L.A., Joshi, N., & Weiland, I. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning Nature of Science in the Early Childhood Years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(537). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
2.
Arnott, L., Palaiologou, I., & Gray, C. (2018). Digital devices, internet‐enabled toys and digital games: The changing nature of young children’s learning ecologies, experiences and pedagogies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 803-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.1....
 
3.
Australian Government Department of Education and Training. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/....
 
4.
Bers, M. U. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
 
5.
Bers, M. U., Seddighin, S., & Sullivan, A. (2013). Ready for robotics: Bringing together the T and E of STEM in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(3), 355-377. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.o....
 
6.
Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/978145....
 
7.
Clark, A. (1999). An Embodied Cognitive Science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 345-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-....
 
8.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2017). National innovation and science agenda. Australian Government. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/n....
 
9.
Davidson, C. N. (2011). Now you see it: How the brain science of attention will transform the way we live, work, and learn. New York, NY: Viking.
 
10.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
 
11.
Department of Education and Employment Workplace Relations. (2009). Early Years Learning and Framework Australia: Belonging, Being & Becoming. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/...
 
12.
Dewey, J. (2011). Democracy and Education. Milton Keynes: Simon and Brown.
 
13.
Early Childhood Australia. (2018). Statement on young children and digital technologies. Retrieved from http://www.earlychildhoodaustr...
 
14.
Education Council. (2015). National STEM School Education Strategy 2016–2026. Canberra: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.educationcouncil.ed...
 
15.
Elkin, M., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Programming with the KIBO robotics kit in preschool classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/073805....
 
16.
Fleer, M. (2010). Early learning and development: Cultural historical concepts in play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
 
17.
Fleer, M. (2015). Science for children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.1....
 
18.
Fleer, M. (2018). Digital animation: New conditions for children’s development in play‐based setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 943-958. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.1....
 
19.
Groundwater-Smith, S., Dockett, S., & Bottrell, D. (2014). Participatory Research with Children and Young People. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/978147....
 
20.
Hedegaard, M. (2008). Principles for interpreting research protocols. In M. Hedegaard, M. Fleer, J. Bang, & P. Hviid (Eds.), Studying children: A cultural-historical approach (pp. 46-64). Maidenhead/New York: Open University Press.
 
21.
Jetnikoff, A. (2015). Design based research methodology for teaching with technology in English [online]. English in Australia, 50(3), 56-60. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/937....
 
22.
Kärkkäinen, K., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Sparking innovation in STEM education with technology and collaboration: A case study of the HP Catalyst Initiative. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 91. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k480s....
 
23.
Kewalramani, S., Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2019). Preschool teachers’ beliefs and pedagogical practices in the integration of technology: A case for engaging young children in scientific inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
24.
littleBits electronics Inc. (2017). Kits, Curriculum, Community. Retrieved from https://littlebits.com/.
 
25.
Lucas, B., & Hanson, J. (2014). Thinking like an engineer: Using engineering habits of mind and signature pedagogies to redesign engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 6(2), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v....
 
26.
Marsh, J., Kumpulainen, K., Nisha, B., Velicu, A., Blum-Ross, A., Hyatt, D., ….. Thorsteinsson, G. (2017) Makerspaces in the Early Years: A Literature Review. University of Sheffield: MakEY Project. Retrieved from http://makeyproject.eu/wp-cont....
 
27.
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-....
 
28.
McDonald, S., & Howell, J. (2012). Watching, creating and achieving: Creative technologies as a conduit for learning in the early years. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 641-651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
 
29.
Peppler, K., Wohlwend, K., Thompson, N., Tan, V., & Thomas, A. (2019). Squishing circuits: Circuitry learning with electronics and playdough in Early Childhood. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956... 10.1007/s10956-018-9752-2.
 
30.
Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-....
 
31.
Resnick, M. (2013). Learn to Code, Code to Learn. EdSurge, May 2013.
 
32.
Resnick, M., Martin, F., Berg, R., Borovoy, R., Colella, V., Kramer, K. et al. (1998). Digital manipulatives. Proceedings of the CHI ‘98 conference, Los Angeles, April 1998. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644....
 
33.
Simoncini, K., & Lasen, M. (2018). Ideas about STEM among Australian Early Childhood professionals: How important is STEM in Early Childhood Education? International Journal of Early Childhood, 50(3), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158....
 
34.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
 
35.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M.U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798....
 
36.
Sullivan, F., & Heffernan, J. (2016). Robotic Construction Kits as computational manipulatives for learning in the STEM disciplines, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 105-128, https://doi.org/10.1080/153915....
 
37.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994) A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, MIT Press.
 
38.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. J. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321, https://doi.org/10.1080/002202....
 
39.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
 
40.
Weiskopf, D. A. (2010). Embodied cognition and linguistic comprehension. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41(3), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shps....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215