Comparison of Chinese and Korean Students Understanding Their Constraints on Participation of Leisure Activities context of Environmental education

Henan University of Technology
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 2017;13(7):4281–4290
Online publish date: 2017-06-26
Publish date: 2017-06-26
The purpose of this study was to compare the differences of leisure participation activities and leisure constraints between Chinese students and Korean students. A random on-site survey was conducted from April 20th to June 20th 2015 and a systematic sampling approach was used to select 630 respondents (300 Chinese students and 330 Korean students) in Korea Paichai University. This study used factor analysis to select 5 constraint factors on recreational activities participation (Psychological, Time, Accessibility, Partner, and facility & Safety). T-test analysis also revealed the significant differences from Chinese students and Korean students on the constraint of recreational activities participation. In the end the insufficiency of this study is put forward and recommendations on the future study are also given.
Guang-Hui Qiao   
School of Management, Henan University of Technology, China. Address to No.100, Lianhua St., High-tech Dist., Zhengzhou City 450001, China. Tel: +86-186-2371-7101.
1. Alexandris, K., Tsorbatzoudis, C., & Grouios, G. (2002). Perceived constraints on recreational sport participation: Investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and a motivation. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(3), 233-252.
2. Arruti, A. (2012). Sustainable leisure education (eos) as a renewed approach for the curriculum design. In ICERI2012 Proceedings (pp. 2441-2451). IATED.
3. Backman, S. J. (1991). An investigation of the relationship between activity loyalty and perceived constraints. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(4), 332-344.
4. Backman, S. J., & Crompton, J. L. (1990). Differentiating between active and passive discontinuers of two leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(3), 197-212. Bergin, D. A. (1992). Leisure activity, motivation, and academic achievement in high school students. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 225-239.
5. Barker, M., Child, C., Gallois, C., Jones, E., & Callan, V. J. (1991). Difficulties of overseas students in social and academic situations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43(2), 79-84. doi:10.1080/00049539108259104.
6. Bueno, F. P. (2016). Environmental education and tourism: methodologies for environmental education applied as tourist-recreational activities in natural settings. Turismo-Estudos E Praticas, 5(2), 60-79.
7. Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sciences, 9(2), 119-127. doi:10.1080/01490408709512151.
8. Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 309-320. doi:10.1080/01490409109513147.
9. Engel-Yeger, B. (2012). Leisure activities preference of Israeli Jewish children from secular versus Orthodox families. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy, 19(4), 341-349.
10. Engel-Yeger, B. (2013). Comparing participation patterns in out-of-school activities between Israeli Jewish and Muslim children. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy, 20(5), 323-335.
11. Heung, V. C., Kucukusta, D., & Song, H. (2011). Medical tourism development in Hong Kong: An assessment of the barriers. Tourism Management, 32(5), 995-1005. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.08.012.
12. http://www.chuguo.cn/news/107927.xhtml Admin (Feb. 2008). The number of students from China studying aboard in 2008 will exceed 200,000. Retrieve date: April 2009.
13. Kay, T., & Jackson, G. (1991). Leisure despite constraint: The impact of leisure constraints on leisure participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(4), 301-313.
14. Kim, S. S., & Wong, K. K. (2006). Effects of news shock on inbound tourist demand volatility in Korea. Journal of Travel Research, 44(4), 457-466. doi:10.1177/0047287505282946.
15. Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2006). Predicting behavioral intention of choosing a travel destination. Tourism Management, 27(4), 589-599. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2005.02.003.
16. Leong, F. T. L., & Chou, E. L. (1996). Counseling international students. In P. B. Pedersen, J. G. Draguns, W. J. Lonner, & J. E. Trimble (Eds.), Counseling across cultures ((4th ed.)) (pp. 210–242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Li, M., Zhang, H., Mao, I., & Deng, C. (2011). Segmenting Chinese outbound tourists by perceived constraints. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(6), 629-643. doi:10.1080/10548408.2011.598747.
18. McGuire, F. A., Dottavio, D., & O'Leary, J. T. (1986). Constraints to participation in outdoor recreation across the life span: A nationwide study of limitors and prohibitors. The Gerontologist, 26(5), 538-544. doi:10.1093/geront/26.5.538.
19. Scott, D. (1991). The problematic nature of participation in contract bridge: A qualitative study of group‐related constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 321-336. doi:10.1080/01490409109513148.
20. Shaw, S. M., Bonen, A., & McCabe, J. F. (1991). Do more constraints mean less leisure? Examining the relationship between constraints and participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(4), 286-300.
21. Sparks, B., & Pan, G. W. (2009). Chinese outbound tourists: Understanding their attitudes, constraints and use of information sources. Tourism Management, 30(4), 483-494. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.10.014.
22. Toyokawa, T., & Toyokawa, N. (2002). Extracurricular activities and the adjustment of Asian international students: A study of Japanese students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(4), 363-379. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00010-X.
23. Wang, Y. S. (2014). Effects of budgetary constraints on international tourism expenditures. Tourism Management, 41, 9-18. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.08.006.
24. Williams, P., & Fidgeon, P. R. (2000). Addressing participation constraint: a case study of potential skiers. Tourism Management, 21(4), 379-393. doi:10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00083-7.