Didactic Value of Gamification Tools for Teaching Modeling as a Method of Learning and Cognitive Activity at School
More details
Hide details
Vyatka State University, Kirov RUSSIA
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
S. Baishev Aktyubinsk University, Aktobe, REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
Karachay-Cherkessian State University named after U.D. Aliev, Karachaevsk, RUSSIA
Online publish date: 2018-04-10
Publish date: 2018-04-10
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(6):2427–2444
The relevance of this article is determined by the possibility to increase the efficiency of teaching modeling at schools by means of involving modern gaming and educational platforms in students’ cognitive activity. The problem of the study results from the contradiction between the broad potential of the gamification tools to motivate and involve students in modeling, to improve their skills, and the ideas of the general methodology about gamifying the educational process as well as the lack of well-designed techniques and methods of using the appropriate software to teach modeling at school. The purpose of the study is to define the didactic value of the gamification tools used to teach modeling at school and to develop a methodological approach to the structured lesson planning using computer game instruction technology. The article describes the types of schoolchildren activities, which allow the use of gamification tools for modeling, to develop schoolchildren’s research skills and the ability to use modern tools to solve theoretical and experimental problems. It describes methodological methods and recommendations on organizing information and pedagogical interaction between the participants of the educational process by applying educational programs available on gaming platforms both at the level of personal communication between the teacher and the student, and at the level of the tripartite “teacher-student-computer” interaction. The results of the study can be used, firstly, to change the techniques and methods of teaching modeling at school; secondly, to improve conventional training programs included in the curriculum for university students of pedagogical departments and faculties; thirdly, to develop and improve specific educational programs in various subjects on the gaming platforms for schools in order to improve the quality of education, social integration, and career orientation.
1. Akwee, P. E., Toili, W. W., & Palapala, V. A. (2012). Effectiveness of computer based technology integration in teaching and learning gene concept among high school students, Kenya. European Journal of Health and Biology Education, 1(1), 31-52.
2. Aleshchanova, I. V., Frolova, N. A., Morozova, E. V., & Zheltukhina, M. R. (2017). Psychological and Acmeological Aspect of Educational Cognitive Competence Development, in Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities (CILDIAH 2017). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 97, 19-24.
3. Aykac, V. (2015). An application regarding the availability of mind maps in visual art education based on active learning method. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1859-1866.
4. Babintsev, V. P., Sapryka, V. А., Serkina, Ya. I., & Ushamirskaya, G. F. (2016). Reform of higher education in Russia: habitus conflict. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 17(3), 284–294.
5. Beshenkov, S. A., Mindzaeva, E. V., Beshenkova, E. V., Shutikova, M. I., & Trubina, I. I. (2016). Information Education in Russia. Cham: Springer.
6. Bodnar, Ch., & Clark, R. (2017). Can Game-Based Learning Enhance Engineering Communication Skills? IEEE transactions on professional communication, 60(1), 24–41.
7. Borisenko, I. G., Yatsenko, M. P., & Chernykh, S. I. (2016). Information policy in the education system as a reflection of the society problems. Philosophy of education, 1(64), 51–60.
8. Brull, S., & Finlayson, S. (2016). Importance of Gamification in Increasing Learning. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(8), 372–375.
9. Cakiroglu, U., Basibuyuk, B., & Guler, M. (2017). Gamifying an ICT course: Influences on engagement and academic performance. Computers in human behavior, 69, 98–107.
10. Chou, C. (2017). An Analysis of the 3D Video and Interactive Response Approach Effects on the Science Remedial Teaching for Fourth Grade Underachieving Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(4), 1059-1073.
11. Chubik, P. S., Chuchalin, А. I., Soloviev, М. А., & Zamyatina, О. М. (2013). Training of high-class technicians and technologists. Voprosyobrazovaniya/Educational Studies, 2, 188-208.
12. Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & Sáez-López, J.M. (2016). Game-based learning and gamification in initial teacher training in the social sciences: an experiment with MinecraftEdu. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 12-24.
13. Denning, P., Comer, D., Gries, D., Mulder, M., Tucker, A., Turner, J., & Young, P. (1989). Computing as a discipline. Communications of the ACM, 32, 1, 9–23.
14. Deterding, S., Kahled, R., Nacke, L., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Toward a Definition. Retrieved from
15. Dichev, Ch., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 14, 9-16.
16. Duvanov, А. (1989). Robotolandia: course of Informatics for junior schoolchildren. Informatics and Education, 5, 37–45.
17. Edwards, A., & Head, M. (2016). Introducing a culture of modeling to enhance conceptual understanding in high school chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 1377-1382.
18. Emerson, T. L. N., English, L., & McGoldrick, K. M. (2016). Cooperative learning and personality types. International Review of Economics Education, 21, 21–29.
19. Faiella, F. (2015). Gamification and learning: a review of issues and research. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11, 3-17.
20. Freinet, C. (1950). Essai de psychologie sensible appliquée à l’éducation. Retrieved from
21. Galperin, P. Ya. (2005). Lectures on Psychology. Moscow: KDU.
22. Granitskaya, А. S. (1991). Teaching to think and act. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
23. Grigoriev, I. S. (2016). Foreign Experience of Usage of Computer Games in Teaching Children. Psychological Science and Education, 8(4), 33–40.
24. Hamada, M., & Hassan, M. (2017). An Interactive Learning Environment for Information and Communication Theory. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 35-59.
25. Hasegawa, H., Shibasaki, S., & Ito, Y. (2015). Shape and Layout Understanding Method Using Brain Machine Interface for Idea Creation Support System. Procedia Computer Science, 60, 1205–1214.
26. Husen, T., & Tuijnman, A. (1991). The contribution of formal schooling to the increase in intellectual capital. Educational Researcher, 20(7), 17-25.
27. Jacobson, E. (2006). Computer homework effectiveness in developmental mathematics. Journal of Developmental Education, 29(3), 2-8.
28. Kapp, K. M. (2007). Tools and techniques for transferring know-how from boomers to gamers. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 2(5), 22–37.
29. Kelly, J. F (2013). Kodu for Kids: The Official Guide to Creating Your Own Video Games, Que. Retrieved from
30. Kelly, P., Koates, H., & Naylor, R. (2016). Leading Online Education from Participation to Success. Educational Studies, 3, 34–58.
31. Kholodnaya, M. А. (2015). Intelligence, creativity, learning capability: resource approach. Psychological Journal, 36(5), 5-14.
32. Koroleva, D. О. (2016). Always online: using mobile technologies and social media at home and at school by modern teenagers. Voprosyobrazovaniya/Educational Studies, 1, 205–224.
33. Kubiatko, M., Usak, M., Yilmaz, K., & Tasar, M. F. (2010). A cross-national study of Czech and Turkish university students’ attitudes towards ICT used in science subject. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(2). 119-134.
34. Kuznetsov, A. A., & Beshenkov, S. A. (2005). Russian Educational Standards of Informatics and Informatics Technologies. Berlin: Springer.
35. Lebedeva, O., Bykova, S., Masalimova, A. R., Sokolova, N. L., & Kryukova, N. I. (2018). Peculiarities of developing high school students’ lexical skills by means of the programmed learning technology. XLinguae, 11(1), 186-202.
36. Leontiev, D. А, Lebedeva, А. А, & Kostenko, V. Yu. (2017). Pathways of Personality Development: Following Lev Vygotsky’s Guidelines. Voprosyobrazovaniya/Educational Studies, 2, 98–112.
37. Llorens-Largo, F., Gallego-Duran, F., &Villagra-Arnedo, C. (2016). Gamification of the Learning Process: Lessons Learned. IEEE revistaiberoamericana de tecnologias del aprendizaje-ieeerita, 11(4), 227-234.
38. Luchenkov, А. V. (2016). Age-Oriented High School Model: Implementation Outcomes. Voprosyobrazovaniya/Educational Studies, 1, 191-204.
39. Maloshonok, N. G. (2016). How Using the Internet and Multimedia Technology in the Learning Process Correlates with Student Engagement. Voprosyobrazovaniya, 4, 59-83.
40. Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96(6), 1071–1105.
41. Marti-Parreno, J., Mendez-Ibanez, E., & Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2016). The use of gamification in education. Journal of computer assisted learning, 32(6), 663–676.
42. Mayer, R. V. (2016). Сomputer model of the empirical knowledge of physics formation: coordination with testing results. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 16(2), 239-247.
43. Mayer, R. V. (2017). Training Modeling Based on Representation of the Meaningful Information as a System of Connected Elements. Scientific research and development. Social and Humanitarian Research and Technology, 2(19), 325-334.
44. McVey, M. (2013). Changing spaces of education: New perspectives on the nature of learning. International Review of Education, 59(6), 805–807.
45. Nenashev, М. I., Okulov, S. M., & Yulov, V. F. (2012). About children Intellectual Development in the Process of Studying Informatics. Herald of Vyatka State University, 3(3), 64-68.
46. Papert, S (1980). Mindstorms. Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Retrieved from
47. Pennington, B., & McComas, J. (2016). Effects of the good behavior game across classroom contexts. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 50(1), 176–180.
48. Polyakova, V. А., & Kozlov, О.А. (2015). Impact of gamification on information and educational environment of school. Modern problems of science and education, 5, 425-431.
49. Potaturov, V. А. (2015). Informatization of education as a problem of culture. Man and Culture, 3(3), 1–40.
50. Robert, I. V. (2014). Didactics in the context of informatization of education. NauchnyiPoisk, 2, 37–42.
51. Rogoff, B., & Morelli, G. (1989). Perspectives on children’s development from cultural psychology. American Psychologist, 44, 343-348.
52. Rozhina, V. A., & Baklashova, T. A. (2018). Teaching English language to young school-age children while making projects, playing games and using robotics. XLinguae, 11(1), 102-113.
53. Rubinstein, S. L. (2002). Fundamentals of general Psychology. St. Petersburg: Piter.
54. Scanlon, E. (2010). Technology enhanced learning in science: interactions, affordances and design based research. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2, 8-19.
55. Semenov, A. (2017). Seymour Papert and Us. Constructionism as the Educational Philosophy of the 21st Century. Educational Studies, 1, 269–294.
56. Soboleva, Е. V., Karavaev, N. L., & Perevozchikova, М. S. (2017). Improving the content of teacher training for the development and application of computer games in learning process. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 6, 54-70.
57. Soboleva, Е. V., Sokolova, А. N., Isupova, N. I., & Suvorova, Т. N. (2017). Use of training programs based on gaming platforms for improving the effectiveness of education. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 4, 7-25.
58. Soboleva, Е. V., & Karavaev, N. L. (2017). Analysis of software services and platforms that have the potential for gamification of educational process. Concept scientific and methodological electronic journal, 8, 14-25.
59. Soboleva, Е. V., & Perevozchikova, М. S. (2017). The problem of evaluation of a game educational project. Naukaiobrazovanie: novoyevremya, 5(22), 170-176.
60. Sokolowski, A., Yalvac, B., & Loving, C. (2011). Science modelling in pre-calculus: How to make mathematics problems contextually meaningful. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(3), 283–297.
61. Su, C. (2017). The effects of students’ learning anxiety and motivation on the learning achievement in the activity theory based gamified learning environment. EURASIA Journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 13(5), 1229-1258.
62. Trofimov, V. М. (2017). About the mathematical nature of acumen. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 4, 151–170.
63. Tyumeneva, Yu. А., & Shkliaeva, I. V. (2016). Two Approaches to the Concept of Knowledge Application: Transfer and Modeling. Overview and Criticism. Educational Studies, 3, 8–33.
64. Ursul, А. D., & Ursul, T.A. (2015). Education for Sustainable Development: The First Results, Problems and Prospects. Sociodynamics, 1(1), 11–74.
65. Vasenina, Е. А., & Soboleva, Е. V. (2013). Interaction between the participants of the educational process in informatics in the context of information technology application. Kirov: VyatSU.
66. Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Thinking and speech. Moscow: Labirint.
67. Yakimanskaya, I. S. (2011). Fundamentals of personality-oriented education. Moscow: BINOM, Laboratoriaznaniy.