Do Chinese Exporters Still Need Learning Spillovers from Foreign MNEs?
Ting Zhao 1  
,  
Ling Liu 2
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics, Zhejiang Gongshang University
2
University of Edinburgh Business School
3
Glasgow University Business School
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Ting Zhao   

School of Economics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Xuezheng Street, Hangzhou, China, 310018, Tel: +86-13858184521
Online publish date: 2017-08-23
Publish date: 2017-08-23
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(8):5969–5984
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The study investigates learning spillovers from local firms as well as MNEs in China, and their indirect effects on other firms’ exporting, paying particular attention to inter- and intra-industry spillovers. We develop a synthetic model based on the treatment of spillovers in economics, geography and international business, testing four different spillover effects, measured by export propensity and intensity of local Chinese firms associated with four types of export agglomeration. We find significant, positive spillovers effects. Surprisingly, spillovers transmitted from locally-owned exporters to local firms turn out to be stronger than those from foreign-owned exporters to local firms. Unsurprisingly, spillovers transmitted within the same industry are stronger than with different industries. The evidence suggests that after 30 years of openness to international trade and export-oriented development, China’s indigenous firms have started to make a significant contribution to the export performance of other local firms. This finding is different from findings from previous empirical analysis, which reveals that maybe there’s a diminishing teaching effects from foreign MNEs to local firms.
 
REFERENCES (47)
1.
Aitken, B., Hanson, G. H., & Harrison, A. E. (1997). Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behaviour. Journal of International Economics 43, 103-132.
 
2.
Anwar, S., & Nguyen, L. P. (2011). Foreign direct investment and export spillovers: Evidence from Vietnam. International Business Review 20, 177-193.
 
3.
Barbosa, N., & Eiriz, V. (2009). The role of inward foreign direct investment on entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 5, 319-339.
 
4.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99-120.
 
5.
Barrios, S., Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2001). Explaining firms’ export behaviour: The role of R&D and spillovers. Documentode Trabajo, 12.
 
6.
Becchetti, L., & Rossi, S. P. S. (2000). The positive effect of industrial district on the export performance of Italian firms. Review of Industrial Organization 16, 53-68.
 
7.
Bernard, A., & Jensen, J. B. (2004). Why some firms export? Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 561-569.
 
8.
Boudeville, J. R. (1966). Problems of regional economic planning. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
 
9.
Buck, T., Filatotchev, I., Nolan, P., & Wright, M. (2000). Different paths to economic reform in Russia and China: Causes and consequences. Journal of World Business 35, 379-400.
 
10.
Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., Zheng, P., Siler, P. A., & Giorgoni, G. (2007). The impact of foreign direct investment on the productivity of China’s Automotive. Management International Review 47, 707-724.
 
11.
Chevassus-Lozza, E., & Galliano, D. (2003). Local spillovers, firm organization and export behaviour: evidence from the French food industry. Regional Studies, 37, 147-158.
 
12.
Clerides, S., Lach, S., & Tybout, J. (1998). Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Columbia, Mexico and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 903-948.
 
13.
Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 45-66.
 
14.
Egeraat, C. (2006). Spatial concentration in the Irish pharmaceutical industry: the role of government intervention and agglomeration economies. NIRSA, Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 104(3), 338-358.
 
15.
Fan, C. C., & Scott, A. J. (2003). Industrial agglomeration and development: a survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese regions. Economic Geography, 79, 295-319.
 
16.
Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2009). The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: the effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1005-1021.
 
17.
Giroud, A. (2007). MNEs vertical linkages: The experience of Vietnam after Malaysia. International Business Review 16, 159-176.
 
18.
Görg, H., & Greenaway, D. (2004). Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? The World Bank Research Observer, 19, 171.
 
19.
Greenaway, D., & Kneller, R. (2007). Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment: A survey. Economic Journal, 117, 134-161.
 
20.
Greenaway, D., & Kneller, R. (2008). Exporting, productivity and agglomeration. European Economic Review, 52, 919-939.
 
21.
Greenaway, D., Sousa, N., & Wakelin, K. (2004). Do domestic firms learn to export from multinationals? European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 1027-1043.
 
22.
Haddad, M., & Harrison, A. (1993). Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, 42, 51-74.
 
23.
Hallin, C., Holmström, & Lind, C. (2011). Revisiting the external impact of MNCs: An empirical study of the mechanisms behind knowledge spillovers from MNC subsidiaries. International Business Review, 21(2), 167-179.
 
24.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
 
25.
Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94, 605-627.
 
26.
Kneller, R., & Pisu, M. (2007). Industrial linkages and export spillovers from FDI. The World Economy 30, 105-134.
 
27.
Koenig, P., 2009. Agglomeration and the export decisions of French firms. Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 186-195.
 
28.
Koenig, P., Mayneris, F., & Poncet, S. (2010). Local export spillovers in France. European Economic Review, 54, 622-641.
 
29.
Kugler, M. (2006). Spillovers from foreign direct investment: within or between industries? Journal of Development Economics, 80, 444-477.
 
30.
Leonidou, L. C., & Katsikeas, C. S. (1996). The export development process: an integrative review of empirical models. Journal of International Business Studies, 517-551.
 
31.
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservable. The Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317-342.
 
32.
Ma, A. C. (2006). Export spillovers to Chinese firms: Evidence from Provincial data. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 4, 127-149.
 
33.
Malmberg, A., Malmberg, B., & Lundequist, P. (2000). Agglomeration and firm performance: economies of scale, localisation, and urbanisation among Swedish export firms. Environment and Planning, 32, 305-321.
 
34.
Mayer, K., & Sinani, E. (2009). When and where does foreign direct investment generate positive spillovers? a meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1075-1094.
 
35.
Mayneris, F., Poncet, S., & Koenig, P. (2009). Local export spillovers in France. European Economic Review, 54(4), 622-641.
 
36.
Ostry, S., & Gestrin, M. (1993). Foreign direct investment, technology transfer and the innovation-network model. Transnational Corporations, 2, 7-30.
 
37.
Porter, M. E. (1996). Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International regional science review, 19, 85.
 
38.
Romer, P. (1994). New goods, old theory, and the welfare costs of trade restrictions. Journal of Development Economics, 43, 5-38.
 
39.
Ruane, F., & Sutherland, J. (2004). Ownership and export characteristics of Irish manufacturing performance. International Institute of Integration Studies, Discussion Paper No. 21, Trinity College.
 
40.
Scott-Kennel, J. (2004). Foreign Direct Investment: A Catalyst for Local Firm Development? The European Journal of Development Research, 16, 624-652.
 
41.
Siotis, G. (1999). Foreign direct investment strategies and firms’ capabilities. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 8, 251-270.
 
42.
Sun, S. (2009). How does FDI affect domestic firms’ exports? Industrial evidence. The World Economy, 32, 1203-1222.
 
43.
Swenson, S. (2008). Multinationals and the Creation of Chinese Trade Linkages. Canadian Journal of Economic, 41, 596-618.
 
44.
Wang, J. (2001). Innovative spaces: Enterprise clusters and regional development (in Chinese). Beijing: Peking University Press, Beijing.
 
45.
Wei, Y., & Liu, X. (2006). Productivity spillovers from R&D, exports and FDI in China’s manufacturing sector Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 544-557.
 
46.
Wheeler, D., & Mody, A. (1992). International investment location decisions: The case of US firms. Journal of International Economics, 33, 57-76.
 
47.
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1-33.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215