RESEARCH PAPER
Education Quality of Rural Preschool Education Institutions based on the NAEYC Evaluation Standard: an Empirical Study of 20 Kindergartens in Cang County of Hebei Province
Lin-Bo Si 1
,  
Hua-Yun Qiao 2  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, CHINA
2
LiRen College, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066044, CHINA
Online publish date: 2017-11-24
Publish date: 2017-11-24
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):8295–8304
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In this paper, taking the education quality of rural preschool education institutions in Cang County of Hebei Province as the research object, and 20 kindergartens of different educational levels and certification standards in Cang County of Hebei Province as the research samples, five evaluation indexes---teacher-student interaction, curriculum, physical environment, health and safety, and nutrition and diet were constructed according to the evaluation standard of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). A multivariate linear regression analysis evaluation model was built to evaluate the education quality of rural preschool education institutions in Cang County of Hebei Province according to the survey data. Through the data analysis, the problems of interscholastic unbalance of educational resource distribution and education quality, low literacy of teachers, unreasonable curriculum and unqualified private kindergarten in rural preschool education institutions in Cang County of Hebei Province were found, and the solutions of strengthening education resources, improving teacher qualification and teacher training systems, improving the treatment of teachers and strengthening quality supervision were put forward.
 
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Atapattu, T., Falkner, K., & Falkner, N. (2017). A comprehensive text analysis of lecture slides to generate concept maps. Computers & Education, 115, 96-113. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.001.
 
2.
Ballou, D., & Springer, M. G. (2017). Has NCLB encouraged educational triage? Accountability and the distribution of achievement gains. Education Finance and Policy, 12(1), 77-106. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00189.
 
3.
Chase, C. C., & Klahr, D. (2017). Invention versus direct instruction: for some content, it’s a tie. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(6), 582-596. doi:10.1007/s10956-017-9700-6.
 
4.
Cochrane, T., & Davey, R. C. (2017). Mixed-methods evaluation of a healthy exercise, eating, and lifestyle program for primary schools. Journal of School Health, 87(11), 823-831. doi:10.1111/josh.12555.
 
5.
Falloon, G. (2017). Mobile devices and apps as scaffolds to science learning in the primary classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(6), 613-628. doi:10.1007/s10956-017-9702-4.
 
6.
Geller, E. H., Son, J. Y., & Stigler, J. W. (2017). Conceptual explanations and understanding fraction comparisons. Learning and Instruction, 52, 122-129. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.006.
 
7.
Gunter, G. A., & Reeves, J. L. (2017). Online professional development embedded with mobile learning: An examination of teachers’ attitudes, engagement and dispositions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1305-1317. doi:10.1111/bjet.12490.
 
8.
He, Y. L., & He, J. (2015). Characteristics and Enlightenment of the NAEYC Early Childhood Program Standards and Accreditation Criteria. Journal of Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University, 31(01), 60-63.
 
9.
Huang, X. T., & Song, Y. Q. (2013). Evaluation of the quality and performance of preschool education: taking process quality evaluation of kindergartens as an example. Peking University Education Review, 11(01), 2-10+189. doi:10.19355/j.cnki.1671-9468.2013.01.002.
 
10.
Karatas, I., Guven, B., Öztürk, Y., Arslan, S. & Gürsöy, K. (2017). Investigation of pre-school teachers’ beliefs about mathematics education in terms of their experience and structure of their education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 13(3), 973–689. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00638a.
 
11.
Lai, Y., Xue, X. F., & Yang, R. A. (2015). On the Allocation Problems of Teacher Resources of Pre-school Education in Rural Areas and Its Optimized Path. Education Research, 36(3), 103-111.
 
12.
Lam, R., & Muldner, K. (2017). Manipulating cognitive engagement in preparation-to-collaborate tasks and the effects on learning. Learning and Instruction, 52, 90-101. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.002.
 
13.
Li, X. Y., & Kang, Y. X. (2014). Institutional basis and countermeasures for removal of “primary school--orientation” in kindergarten education. Educational Science Research, (7), 5-10+15.
 
14.
Liu, Z. L. (2012). Present situation of the quality of kindergarten education in China------comparison with the quality of kindergarten education in 1992. Studies in Preschool Education, (2), 3-10. doi:10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2012.02.005.
 
15.
Liu, Z. L. (2017). Teaching reform of business statistics in college and university. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6901–6907. doi:10.12973/ejmste/78537.
 
16.
Luo, N. A., Zhang, M. L., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 115, 153-160. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006.
 
17.
Mayer, C. (2017). Written forms of signed languages: a route to literacy for deaf learners? American Annals of the Deaf, 161(5), 552-559.
 
18.
Or-Kan, S. (2017). Processing academic science reading texts through context effects: evidence from eye movements. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 771–790. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00642a.
 
19.
Paredes, V. (2017). Grading system and student effort. Education Finance and Policy, 12(1), 107-128. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00195.
 
20.
Parks-Stamm, E. J., Zafonte, M., & Palenque, S. M. (2017). The effects of instructor participation and class size on student participation in an online class discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1250-1259. doi:10.1111/bjet.12512.
 
21.
Si, L. B., & Qiao, H. Y. (2017). Performance of Financial Expenditure in China’s basic science and math education: Panel Data Analysis Based on CCR Model and BBC Model. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5217-5224. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00995a.
 
22.
Taleb, T. F. A. (2013). “NAEYC’s key attributes of quality preschool programs” applied to the Jordanian kindergarten context. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 307-314. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0550-9.
 
23.
Wang, J., & Wang, Z. j. (2013). A Study on the Accreditation Program for the Preschools in America: taking Academy of NAEYC as an Example, Modern Education Management, (10), 120-123. doi:10.16697/j.cnki.xdjygl.2013.10.001.
 
24.
Xu, Y. W., & Zhang, L. (2017). High quality and many facets: enlightenment from NAEYC Early Project Evaluation System. Early Education, (3), 23-27.
 
25.
Zhang, H. R., Huang, Y. Y., & Li. L. (2013). Study on the Demand of Rural-urban Early Childhood Education Resources in China: Based on the Prediction of School-aged Population, Education Research, 34(5), 60-66.
 
26.
Zhang, S. Y. (2013). Evaluation thought and its enlightenment of the NAEYC Early Childhood Program Standards and Accreditation Criteria. Studies in Preschool Education, (9), 15-20. doi:10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2013.09.006.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215