RESEARCH PAPER
Educational Evaluation Based on Apriori-Gen Algorithm
Chen-Lei Mao 1  
,  
Song-Lin Zou 1
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Management, Jiangxi University of Technology, Nanchang 330098, Jiangxi, CHINA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Chen-Lei Mao   

School of Management, Jiangxi University of Technology, China
Online publish date: 2017-09-29
Publish date: 2017-09-29
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(10):6555–6564
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The issue of educational evaluation has long been a research hotspot. Using big data analysis method to conduct educational evaluation can improve the pertinence and effectiveness of education. Conventional Apriori algorithm has certain limitations in the application of educational evaluation. This paper introduces an improved Apriori-Gen algorithm and describes its application in evaluation of actual effectiveness of ideological and political course of colleges and universities. Through conducting correlation analysis of network questionnaire data, the study requirements of college students can be acquired, so as to improve the teaching effectiveness of ideological and political course. Results show that it is effective to apply the proposed study method in educational evaluation.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Agarwal, R., Aggarwal, C., & Prasad, V. V. V. (2001). A tree projection algorithm for generation of frequent itemsets. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 61(3), 350-371.
 
2.
Agrawal, R., & Shafer, J. C. (1996). Parallel Mining of Association Rules. IEEE Educational Activities Department.
 
3.
Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., et al. (2007). Finding scientific gems with Google’s PageRank algorithm. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 8-15.
 
4.
D’Angelo, G., Rampone, S., & Palmieri, F. (2016). Developing a trust model for pervasive computing based on Apriori association rules learning and Bayesian classification. Soft Computing, 1-19.
 
5.
Enders, C. K. (2003). Using the expectation maximization algorithm to estimate coefficient alpha for scales with item-level missing data. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 322-37.
 
6.
Holt, J. D., & Chung, S. M. (2002). Mining association rules using inverted hashing and pruning. Information Processing Letters, 83(4), 211-220.
 
7.
Hu, J. F. (2017a). Automated detection of driver fatigue based on AdaBoost classifier with EEG signals. Front. Comput. Neurosci. doi:10.3389/fncom.2017.00072.
 
8.
Hu, J. F. (2017b). Comparison of Different Features and Classifiers for Driver Fatigue Detection Based on a Single EEG Channel. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. doi:10.1155/2017/5109530.
 
9.
Hu, J. F., Mu, Z. D., & Wang, P. (2015). Multi-feature authentication system based on event evoked electroencephalogram. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 5(4), 862-870.
 
10.
Mu, Z. D., Hu, J. F., & Yin, J. H. (2017). Driving Fatigue Detecting Based on EEG Signals of Forehead Area. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 31(5), 1750011.
 
11.
Orlando, S., Palmerini, P., & Perego, R. (2001). Enhancing the Apriori Algorithm for Frequent Set Counting. Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 71-82.
 
12.
Öztürkler, Z. (2017). Evaluation of Technology Strategies as Quality Strategy of Higher Education Institutions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 4021-4033. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00770a.
 
13.
Park, J. S., Chen, M. S., & Yu, P. S. (1995). An effective hash-based algorithm for mining association rules. In Proc. 1995 ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, 175-186.
 
14.
Peng, W. (2017). Research on Online Learning Behavior Analysis Model in Big Data Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5675-5684. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.01021a.
 
15.
Sarasere, A., Omiecinsky, E., & Navathe, S. (1995). An efficient algorithm for mining association rules in large databases. In 21st Int. Conf. On Very Large Databases, Zurich, Switzerland, 105-112.
 
16.
Scitovski, R., & Sabo, K. (2014). Analysis of the k -means algorithm in the case of data points occurring on the border of two or more clusters. Knowledge-Based Systems, 57(2), 1-7.
 
17.
Sitthi, A., Nagai, M., Dailey, M., et al. (2016). Exploring Land Use and Land Cover of Geotagged Social-Sensing Images Using Naive Bayes Classifier. Sustainability, 8(9), 921.
 
18.
Song, Q. B., Sheppred, M., Cartwright, M., & Mair, C. (2006). Software Defect Association Mining and Defet Correction Effort Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 69-82.
 
19.
Toivonen, H. (1996). Sampling large databases for association rules. In Proc. 1996 Int. Conf. Very Large Databases, Bombay, India, 134-135.
 
20.
Varank, İ., Erkoç, M. F., Büyükimdat, M. K., Aktaş, M., & Yeni, S. (2014). Effectiveness of an Online Automated Evaluation and Feedback System in an Introductory Computer Literacy Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(5), 395-404.
 
21.
Zaki, M. J., Parthasarathy, S., & Li, W. (1997). A localized algorithm for parallel association mining. IEEE, 321-330.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215