RESEARCH PAPER
Effects of Social and Emotional Learning on Disadvantaged Year 1 Pupils’ Understanding of Sinking and Floating Concepts
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA
Online publish date: 2018-04-21
Publish date: 2018-04-21
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(6):2609–2622
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore Year 1 pupils’ understanding about sinking and floating after learning using Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) strategies. A total of 16 Year 1 pupils of low socio-economic background from one class in a rural school participated in this study. The participants were from disadvantaged rural communities; single parents and two pupils were identified with medical problems (thalassemia and mild autism). In this study, three lessons on sinking and floating were imparted using SEL strategies. Data from three sources; worksheets, interviews and observations were triangulated to cross validate the data and to capture richer information to answer the research question. The triangulation of the findings indicates that SEL strategies created a conducive learning environment; reduced disruptive behaviors among the pupils; encouraged engagement and participation in learning. In sum SEL strategies employed to teach sinking and floating resulted in the pupils having a better understanding of these concepts. The research findings imply that ability in managing social and emotional tendency improved their competency particularly in learning abstract science concepts such as sinking and floating.
 
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Bardon, L. A., Dona, D. P., & Symons, F. J. (2008). Extending class wide social skills interventions to at-risk minority pupils: A preliminary application of randomization tests combined with single-subject design methodology. Behavioral Disorders, 33(3), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874....
 
2.
Berger, C., Alcalay, L., Torretti, A., & Milicic, N. (2011). Socio-emotional well-being and academic achievement: Evidence from a multilevel approach. Psicologia: Reflexaoe Critica, 24(2), 344-351. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-....
 
3.
Biddulph, F., & Osborne, R. (1984). Pupils’ ideas about floating and sinking. Pupils’ ideas about floating and sinking. Research in Science Education, 14(1), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0235....
 
4.
Brock, L. L., Nishida, T. K., Chiong, C., Grimm, K. J., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2008). Children’s perceptions of the classroom environment and social and academic performance: A longitudinal analysis of the contribution of the Responsive Classroom approach. Journal of School Psychology, 46(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.....
 
5.
Butts, D. P., Hofman, H. M., & Anderson, M. (1993). Is hands-on experience enough? A study of young children’s views of sinking and floating objects. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 5(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0317....
 
6.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing pupils’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
 
7.
Fishbein, D. H., Domitrovich, C., Williams, J., Gitukui, S., Guthrie, C., Shapiro, D., & Greenberg, M. (2016). Short-term intervention effects of the PATHS Curriculum in young low-income children: Capitalizing on plasticity. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 37(6), 493-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935....
 
8.
Fleer, M. (2013). Affective imagination in science education: Determining the emotional nature of scientific and technological learning of young children. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2085-2106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
9.
Fox, L., Dunlap, G., Hemmeter, M. L., Joseph, G. E., & Strain, P. S. (2003). The teaching Pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58(4), 48-52.
 
10.
Goleman, D. P. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ for character, health and lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam.
 
11.
Greenberg, M. T., & Kusche, C. A. (1998). Preventive interventions for school-age deaf children: The PATHS curriculum. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3, 49–63. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23....
 
12.
Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Möller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students’ understanding of “floating and sinking”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0....
 
13.
Havu‐Nuutinen, S. (2005). Examining young children’s conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 259-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
14.
Hemmeter, M. L., Ostrosky, M., & Fox, L. (2006). Social and emotional foundations for early learning: A conceptual model for intervention. School Psychology Review, 35(4), 583-601.
 
15.
Honess, A., & Hunter, D. (2014). Teacher perspectives on the implementation of the PATHS curriculum. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/026673....
 
16.
Hsin, C. T., & Wu, H. K. (2011). Using scaffolding strategies to promote young children’s scientific understandings of floating and sinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 656-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
17.
Impedovo, M. A., Delserieys-Pedregosa, A., Jégou, C., & Ravanis, K. (2017). Shadow formation at preschool from a socio-materiality perspective. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 579-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
18.
Kallery, M. (2015). Science in early year’s education: introducing floating and sinking as a property of matter. International Journal of Early Years Education, 23(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/096697....
 
19.
Kam, C. M., Greenberg, M. T., & Kusché, C. A. (2004). Sustained effects of the PATHS curriculum on the social and psychological adjustment of children in special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12(2), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342....
 
20.
Kelly, B., Longbottom, J., Potts, F., & Williamson, J. (2004). Applying emotional intelligence: Exploring the promoting alternative thinking strategies curriculum. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20(3), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/026673....
 
21.
Koslin, B. L., Koslin, S., Zeno, S., & Ivens, S. (1989). The Degrees of Reading Power Test: Primary and standard forms. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates Degree of Reading Power Services.
 
22.
Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). How to support learners in developing usable and lasting knowledge of STEM. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijems....
 
23.
Kusché, C. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (1994). The PATHS curriculum. South Deerfield, MA: Channing-Beta Co.
 
24.
Lao, P. T., & Chiew, L. C. (2010). Dunia, Sains dan Teknologi Tahun 1. Kuala Lumpur; Malaya Press Sdn. Bhd.
 
25.
Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Strom, D., & Pligge, M. (2001). Similarity of form and substance: Modeling material kind. Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-five Years of Progress, 39-74.
 
26.
Martinsone, B., & Damberga, I. (2016). Qualitative analysis of teachers’ written self-reflections after implementation of a social-emotional learning program in Latvia. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/216836....
 
27.
McCormick, M. P., Cappella, E., O’Connor, E. E., & McClowry, S. G. (2015). Context matters for social‐emotional learning: Examining variation in program impact by dimensions of school climate. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56(1-2), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/003681....
 
28.
McDonald, J. R. (2012). Does It Sink or Float? Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 49(3), 77-81.
 
29.
Payton, J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Schellinger, K. B., & Pachan, M. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade pupils: Findings from three scientific reviews. Technical Report. Retrieved on June 29, 2017 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fullt....
 
30.
Qi, C. H., & Kaiser, A. P. (2003). Behavior problems of preschool children from low-income families: Review of the literature. Early Childhood Special Education, 23(4), 188-216.
 
31.
Rimm-Kaufman, S., & McTigue, E. (2011). The ‘Responsive Classroom’ approach and its implications for improving reading and writing. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 27(1-2), 5–24.
 
32.
Schonfeld, D. J., Adams, R. E., Fredstrom, B. K., Weissberg, R. P., Gilman, R., Voyce, C., Tomlin, R., & Speese-Linehan, D. (2015). Cluster-randomized trial demonstrating impact on academic achievement of elementary social-emotional learning. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 406-420.
 
33.
Tippett, C. D., & Milford, T. M. (2017). Findings from a Pre-Kindergarten classroom: Making the case for STEM in early childhood education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(15), 67-86.
 
34.
Tomas, L., & Ritchie, S. M. (2012). Positive emotional responses to hybridised writing about a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 25-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
35.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
 
36.
Zins, J. E., & Elias, M. J. (2007). Social and emotional learning: Promoting the development of all pupils. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17(2-3), 233-255.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215