Effects of the Combination of Synchronous Web-Based Teaching With Visually Creative Teaching on Art Students’ Creativity
Li Ruan 1  
More details
Hide details
Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, CHINA
Online publish date: 2018-05-15
Publish date: 2018-05-15
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(7):3245–3251
This article is retracted by request from the corresponding author. Retraction Note:

The 21st century is the society of information technology and knowledge-based economy. To cope with the information society, teaching methods would be changed. Traditional chalk and talk can no longer adapt to the changing society. In addition to pass down the tradition, new ideas should also be introduced. In the informational age, the Internet becomes an essential living element and synchronous web-based teaching breaks through the obstacle of space, provides instant and multiple communication channels, and creates alternative creativity learning environment. With experimental design, total 208 students in Fujian University of Technology, as the research objects, are proceeded 15-week (3 hours per week for total 45 hours) experimental teaching. The research results show significant effects of 1.synchronous web-based teaching on creativity, 2.visually creative teaching on creativity, and 3.the combination of synchronous web-based teaching with visually creative teaching on the promotion of creativity. According to the results, suggestions are proposed, expecting to construct courses stressing on interdisciplinary integration and inspiring creativity as well as encouraging students to develop creativity through the “originality” of art.
Cela, K. L., Sicilia, M. Á., & Sánchez, S. (2015). Social network analysis in e-learning environments: A Preliminary systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 219.
Chen, S., She, J., Kameda, H., & Ohno, S. (2015). Implementation and evaluation of flipped classroom in Chinese language course. Prague, Czeck: 2015 MAC-ETel.
Chen, Y. (2015). Linking learning styles and learning on mobile Facebook. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 94-114.
Chou, T.-S., Lunsford, P. J., & Thomson, K. (2015). Design of Simulation-Based Laboratories for Teaching Wireless Network Technologies.
Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91-115.
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2014). Transnational identity and migrant language learners: The promise of digital storytelling. Education Matters: The Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(1).
de-Marcos, L., García-López, E., García-Cabot, A., Medina-Merodio, J. A., Domínguez, A., Martínez-Herráiz, J. J., & Diez-Folledo, T. (2016). Social network analysis of a gamified e-learning course: Small-world phenomenon and network metrics as predictors of academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 312-321.
Dong, Y., Zhang, X., Dai, J., & Guan, H. (2014). HYVI: a hybrid virtualization solution balancing performance and manageability. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(9), 2332-2341.
García-Saiz, D., Palazuelos, C., & Zorrilla, M. (2014). Data mining and social network analysis in the educational field: An application for non-expert users. In Educational Data Mining (pp. 411-439). Springer International Publishing.
Hocevar, K. P., Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2014).Social media self-efficacy and information evaluation online. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 254-262.
Huang, T.-Y., Jeyakumar, V., Lantz, B., Feamster, N., Winstein, K., & Sivaraman, A. (2014).Teaching computer networking with mininet. Paper presented at the ACM SIGCOMM.
Hwang, W.-Y., Kongcharoen, C., & Ghinea, G. (2014).To enhance collaborative learning and practice network knowledge with a virtualization laboratory and online synchronous discussion. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(4).
Jansen, M., Scherer, R., & Schroeders, U. (2015). Students’ self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 13-24.
Katz, I., Eilot, K., & Nevo, N. (2014). “I’ll do it later”: Type of motivation, self-efficacy and homework procrastination. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 111-119.
Lai, H. M., & Chen, T. T. (2014). Knowledge sharing in interest online communities: A comparison of posters and lurkers. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 295-306.
Lee, L. (2014). Digital news stories: building language learners’ content knowledge and speaking skills. Foreign Language Annals, 47(2), 338-356.
Lindt, S. F., Corkin, D. M., & Yu, S. I. (2014).Using multiple methods to distinguish active delay and procrastination in College students. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(2), 28-32.
Molano, S., & Polo, A. (2015). Social Network Analysis in a Learning Community. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 185, 339-345.
Park, J. G., & Lee, J. (2014). Knowledge sharing in information systems development projects: Explicating the role of dependence and trust. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 153-165.
Paule-Ruiz, M., Riestra-Gonzalez, M., Sánchez-Santillan, M., & Pérez-Pérez, J. R. (2015). The Procrastination Related Indicators in e-Learning Platforms. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(1), 7-22.
Paver, J., Walker, D. A., et al. (2014). Factors that predict the integration of technology for instruction by community college adjunct faculty. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(1), 68-85.
Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157-170.
Ricoy, M. C., & Feliz, T. (2016). Twitter as a learning community in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 237.
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.-Y., Huang, Y.-M., & Liu, T.-Y. (2015). The Impact of Supported and Annotated Mobile Learning on Achievement and Cognitive Load. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 53-69.
Sheorey, T. (2014). Empirical evidence of relationship between virtual lab development and students learning through field trials on vlab on mechatronics. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(1), 97.
Wasim, J., Sharma, S. K., Khan, I. A., & Siddiqui, J. (2014). Web Based Learning. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5(1), 446-449.
Xu, L., & He, W. (2014).Networked Learning Community Construction Based on Instant Messaging Software. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 971, pp. 1663-1666). Trans Tech Publications.
Xu, L., Huang, D., & Tsai, W.-T. (2014). Cloud-based virtual laboratory for network security education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57(3), 145-150.
Yamada, M., Goda, Y., Matsuda, T., Saito, Y., Kato, H., & Miyagawa, H. (2016). How does self-regulated learning relate to active procrastination and other learning behaviors? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28, 1-18.
Yilmaz, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: Exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 373-382.
You, J. W. (2015). Examining the Effect of Academic Procrastination on Achievement Using LMS Data in E-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 64–74.