Emotional Design in Multimedia Learning: Effects of Multidimensional Concept Maps and Animation on Affect and Learning
More details
Hide details
Department of Tourism and Recreation management, Overseas Chinese University, Taichung 40721, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Department of Accounting, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua 500, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Department of Business Administration, MINGDAO University, Pitou, Changhua 52345, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Publish date: 2018-08-12
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(12):em1612
This study examines the benefits of multimedia materials that combine animation and multidimensional concept maps. In this quasi-experimental study, 114 students from two classes at the college of business of a private university in Taiwan participated in a 6-week teaching experiment. The research instruments included learning achievement tests and a learning well-being scale. The data analyses used a one-way analysis of covariance, a paired sample t-test, a Sobel’s z-test, and a path regression analysis. The results indicated that students who learned with multimedia materials that combined animation and colourful multidimensional concept maps presented significantly higher learning well-being than students who learned with achromatic multidimensional concept maps. Moreover, students who learned with multimedia materials that combined animation and colourful multidimensional concept maps presented significantly higher learning achievement than students who learned with achromatic multidimensional concept maps. A mediation analysis suggested that learning well-being mediated the effect of learning with different multimedia materials on students’ learning achievement. This study suggests that multidimensional concept maps and animation have a function in multimedia instruction.
Anderson, J. R. & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
Beyerbach, B. A. (1998). Development a technical vocabulary: preserves teachers’ concept maps. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 339-347.
Biehler, R. F., & Snowman, J. (1990). Psychology applied to teaching (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Bieneik, V. Y. (2008). Implementation of a cognitive apprenticeship model on student programming and perception of problem-solving ability: An exploratory study. A dissertation of Ph.D., Capella University.
Brookover, W. B., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: School can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
Chiou, C. C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 375-387.
Chiou, C. C. (2009). Effects of concept mapping strategy on learning performance in business and economics statistics. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 55-69.
Chiou, C. C., Lee, L. T., & Liu, Y. Q. (2012). Effect of Novak colorful concept map with digital teaching materials on student academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 192-201.
Chiou, C. C., Tien, L. C., & Lee, L. T. (2015). Effects on learning of multimedia animation combined with multidimensional concept maps. Computers & Education, 80, 211-223.
Chung, K. K. H. (2008) What effect do mixed sensory mode instructional formats have on both novice and experienced learners of Chinese characters? Learning and Instruction, 18, 96-108.
Deimann, M., & Keller. J. M. (2006). Volitional aspects of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15, 137-158.
Ebel, R. L. & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Efklides, A., Kourkoulou, A., Mitsiou, F., & Ziliaskopoulou, D. (2006). Metacognitive knowledge of effort, personality factors, and mood state: Their relationships with effort-related metacognitive experiences. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 33-49.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319.
Garner, R., Gillingham, M., & White, C. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57.
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102.
Heidig, S., Müller, J., & Reichelt, M. (2015). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Differentiation on relevant design features and their effects on emotions and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 81-95.
Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M. & Albert, D. (2008). Dynamic media in computer science education; Content complexity and learning performance: Is less more? Educational Technology & Society, 11, 279-290.
Huang, H. S., Chiou, C. C., Chiang, H. K., Lai, S. H., Huang, C. Y., & Chou, Y. W. (2012). Effects of multidimensional concept maps on fourth graders’ learning in web-based computer course. Computers & Education, 58, 863-873.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.
Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1-12.
Keefe, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1997). Instruction and the learning environment. NY: Eye On Education, Inc.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kieso, D., Weygandt, J., & Kimmel, P. (2012). Financial Accounting (8th ed). John Wiley & Sons.
Lamberski, R. J. (1980). A comprehensive and critical review of the methodology and findings in color investigations. Syracuse, NY: ERIC.
Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T., & Hartley, K. (2007). Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 569-587. 07.002.
Lu, L., & Lin, Y. C. (2003). Academic achievement and self-concept: Chinese and Japanese adolescents. Fu Jen Studies: Science and Engineering, 37, 43-62.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. A., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.
Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003).Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Education psychologist, 38, 43-52.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions. Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Computer games for learning: An evidence-based approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002).Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87-99.
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, H., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198.
McPherson, S. (2000). Expert-novice differences in planning strategies during collegiate singles tennis competition. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22, 39-62.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A Test of the method‐affects‐learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 149-158.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937-950.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984).Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Paivio,A., Sadoski, M. (2011). Lexicons, contexts, events, and images: Commentary on from the perspective of dual coding theory. Cognitive Science, 35, 198-209.
Park, B., & Brünken, R. (2015). The Rhythm method: A new method for measuring cognitive load – an experimental dual-task study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 232-243.
Park, B., Flowerday, T., & Brünken, R. (2015). Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 267-278.
Park, B., Korbach, A., & Brünken, R. (2015). Do learner characteristics moderate the seductive-details-effect? A cognitive load-study using eye-tracking. Educational Technology & Society, 18, 24–36.
Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125-127.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–106.
Pekrun, R., Götz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48.
Pett, D. & Wilson, T. (1996). Color research and its application to the design of instructional materials. ETR & D, 44, 19-35.
Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128–140.
Plass, J., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.) (2010). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 221-238.
Schar, S. G., & Zimmermann, P. G. (2007). Investigating means to reduce cognitive load from animations: applying differentiated measures of knowledge representation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 64-78.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation model. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.) Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stone, C. A., & Sobel, M. E. (1990). The robustness of estimates of total indirect effects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum likelihood. Psychometrika, 55, 337-352.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science. 12, 257–285.
Sweller, J., van Merrie¨nboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Tien, L. C., Chiou, C. C., & Liao, C. W. (2018). Effect of digital materials with combining multimedia and concept maps on cognitive learning: A mediating effect of cognitive load. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 10(1), 95-126.
Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 485–498.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.