Exploring the Underlying Components of Primary School Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Technology Education
 
More details
Hide details
1
Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Publish date: 2011-12-21
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2011;7(4):293–274
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
In the study described in this article, primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of technology education was measured with a multiple choice test; the Teaching of Technology Test (TTT). The aim of the study was to explore the latent factor structure of PCK, which is considered to be a crucial and distinctive domain of teacher knowledge. As far as known, it is the first time that PCK is approached in this way. Many different components of PCK have been proposed in an attempt to define the concept, but these components have never been statistically confirmed. Three components were selected as the main knowledge components of PCK for technology education in primary schools: (1) Knowledge of pupils’ concept of technology and knowledge of their pre and misconceptions related to technology; (2) Knowledge of the nature and purpose of technology education; (3) Knowledge of pedagogical approaches and teaching strategies for technology education. The results of this study gave useful insights into primary school teachers’ PCK of technology education. It appeared that the theoretically predefined knowledge components could be indentified as latent factors. Furthermore, PCK could be characterized as a heterogeneous construct. That is, it consists of many intrinsic elements, which are difficult to unravel. Although measurement of PCK with a multiple-choice test has clear-cut advantages compared to qualitative methods and the results of the TTT are promising, further steps should be taken to reach satisfactory psychometric properties for practical application. This article provides ideas on how to (further) develop a multiple choice test to measure PCK.
 
REFERENCES (27):
1. Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416.
2. Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(6), 523-545.
3. Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct and its implications for science education (Vol. 6, pp. 147-161). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Bleicher, R. E. (2004). Revisiting the stebi b: Measuring selfefficacy in preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104(8), 1-10.
5. Boersma, VandenBogaert, DeBruijn, Dijkgraaf, Ellermeijer, Glimmerveen, et al. (2005). Visie op wetenschap en techniek in het basisonderwijs. [vision on science and technology in primary education]. Den Haag: Platform Bèta Techniek/VTB.
6. Carlsen, W. S. (1999). Domains of teacher knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct and its implications for science education (Vol. 6, pp. 133-144). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Carlson, R. E. (1990). Assessing teachers' pedagogical content knowledge: Item development issues. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 157-173.
8. Cochran, K. F., Deruiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272.
9. De Jong, O., Van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947-964.
10. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, April 8-11, 1990.
11. Greven, J., & Letschert, J. (2006). Kerndoelenboekje. [booklet of standards]. Den Haag: DeltaHage.
12. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
13. Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(2), 121-140.
14. Kansanen, P. (2009). Subject-matter didactics as a central knowledge base for teachers. Or should it be called pedagogical content knowledge? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(1), 29-39.
15. Kromrey, J. D., & Renfrow, D. D. (1991). Using multiple choice examination items to measure teachers' content-specific pedagogical knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Boston, February 13-16, 1991.
16. Lucke, J. F. (2005). The a and the w of congeneric test theory: An extension of reliability and internal consistency to heterogeneous tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(1), 65-81.
17. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct and its implications for science education (Vol. 6, pp. 95-132). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.
19. Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790.
20. Oosterveld, P., & Vorst, H. C. M. (1996). Methoden voor vragenlijstconstructie [methods of test construction]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 51(1), 11-27.
21. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (pck): Pck as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261- 284.
22. Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2009). Measuring teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in primary technology education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 27(3), 327-338.
23. Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2010). Reviewing the relations between teachers’ knowledge and pupils’ attitude in the field of primary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(1), 15-26.
24. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23- 74.
25. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1- 22.
26. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695.
27. Weerden, J. v., Thijssen, J., & Verhelst, N. (2003). Toetsen techniek in het basisonderwijs. Een onderzoek naar de predictieve validiteit van toetsen techniek in het basisonderwijs. [tests for technology in primary education. A study on the predictive validaty of tests for technology in primary education]. Arnhem: Citogroep.
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215