RESEARCH PAPER
Faculty Members’ Concerns about Adopting a Learning Management System (LMS): A Developing Country Perspective
 
More details
Hide details
1
Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, Department of Education, Ma’an, JORDAN
Online publish date: 2017-11-08
Publish date: 2017-11-08
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(11):7527–7537
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study examined the concerns of faculty members regarding the adoption of a Learning Management System (LMS) employing the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). Forty-seven faculty members from a university in Jordan completed the Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ). The SoCQ was used to assess the strength of faculty members’ concerns in seven areas: awareness, information, personal impact, management, consequences, collaboration and refocusing. The results showed that the respondents’ concerns were greatest in the early stages of the introduction of the LMS. Faculty members had a general lack of awareness about LMS and did not have enough information about it. The faculty members had little interest in or engagement with the LMS; they wanted to know more about the effect of LMS on them personally. Furthermore, faculty members had concerns about the management, time, and logistical aspects of the implementation of LMS.
 
REFERENCES (47)
1.
Alghamdi, S. R., & Bayaga, A. (2016). Use and attitude towards Learning Management Systems (LMS) in Saudi Arabian universities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2309-2330.
 
2.
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 5(1), 143-155.
 
3.
Ali, A. H. (2011). The power of social media in developing nations: New tools for closing the global digital divide and beyond Harvard Law School Human Rights Journal, 24(1), 185-219.
 
4.
Anderson.S, E., (1997). Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 331-367.
 
5.
Bsharah, M., Gasaymeh, A. M., & Abdelrahman, M. B. (2014). The Relationship between the use of Social Networking Sites (SNS) and perceived level of social intelligence among Jordanian university students: The case of Facebook. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 6(3), 1-12.
 
6.
Butler, J. (2010, March). In-service teachers and technology integration: digital storytelling reduces teachers’ management concerns in the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1210-1217). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
 
7.
Bybee, R. (1996). The Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM): A model for change in individuals. The National Academies. Retrieved from https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/....
 
8.
Dawson, K., Swain, C., Johnson, N., & Ring, G. (2004). Partnership strategies for systemic integration of technology in teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 3(4), 482-495.
 
9.
Delgado, A. J., Wardlow, L., McKnight, K., & O’Malley, K. (2015). Educational technology: A review of the integration, resources, and effectiveness of technology in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Information Technology Education, 14, 397-416.
 
10.
Dias, S. B., & Diniz, J. A. (2014). Towards an enhanced learning management system for blended learning in higher education incorporating distinct learners’ profiles. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 307-319.
 
11.
Dougherty, K. (2015, 31st. May - 1st. April). Factors that influence college faculty to adopt digital technologies in their practice. Paper presented at the Higher Education in Transformation Conference, Dublin, Ireland.
 
12.
Dysart, S. A., & Weckerle, C. (2015). Professional development in higher education: A model for meaningful technology integration. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 255-265.
 
13.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175-182. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008.
 
14.
Gasaymeh, A. M. M. (2009). A study of faculty attitudes toward internet-based distance education: A survey of two Jordanian public universities (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University). Retrieved from OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
 
15.
Gasaymeh, A. M., Al-hasanat, H., Kraishan, O., & Abutayeh, K. (2017). Motivational Factors Affecting the Integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Education by Faculty Members: A Developing Country Perspective. International Journal of Education, 9(3), 168-182.
 
16.
Gautreau, C. (2011). Motivational factors affecting the integration of a learning management system by faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 8(1), 1-25.
 
17.
George, A. A., Hall, G. E., Stiegelbauer, S. M., & Litke, B. (2008). Measuring Implementation in Schools: Stages of concern questionnaire Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/cbam/socq_....
 
18.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany: State University of New York Press.
 
19.
Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. A. (1977). Measuring Stages of Concern about the Innovation: A Manual for the Use of the SoC Questionnaire. Texas University, Austin. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fullt....
 
20.
Hall, G.E. & Hord, S.M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, Principles & Potholes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
 
21.
Hamade, S. N. (2013). Perception and use of social networking sites among university students. Library Review, 62(6/7), 388-397. doi:10.1108/LR-12-2012-0131.
 
22.
Hussein, H. B. (2011). Attitudes of Saudi universities faculty members towards using learning management system (JUSUR). TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2). 43-53.
 
23.
Johnson, P. M. (2006). Change in Classroom Practices of Technology Use by K-12 Teachers. (Doctoral dissertation, North Calioranis state university). Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses....
 
24.
Khasawneh, M., & Ibrahim, H. (2012). A model for adoption of ICT in Jordanian higher education institutions: An empirical study. Journal of e-Learning & Higher Education, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.ibimapublishing.com....
 
25.
Lai, K. W. (2011). Digital technology and the culture of teaching and learning in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1263-1275.
 
26.
Lochner, B., Conrad, R. M., & Graham, E. (2015). Secondary Teachers’ Concerns in Adopting Learning Management Systems: A US Perspective. TechTrends, 59(5), 62-70.
 
27.
Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686-694.
 
28.
Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & education, 54(2), 588-599.
 
29.
Masrom, I. S. (2013). Stages of lecturers’ concern in utilizing Learning Management System (LMS) in a higher education institution (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi MARA). Retrieved from OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Universiti Teknologi MARA Institutional Repository (UiTM IR).
 
30.
Matar, N. (2015). Evaluating e-learning system use by CBAM-stages of concern methodology in Jordanian universities. World of Computer Science & Information Technology Journal, 5(5), 75-81.
 
31.
Meishar-Tal, H., Kurtz, G., & Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 33-48.
 
32.
Newhouse, C. P. (2001). Applying the concerns-based adoption model to research on Computers in classrooms. Journal of Research on computing in Education, 33(5), 1-21.
 
33.
Noor-Ul-Amin, S. (2013). An effective use of ICT for education and learning by drawing on worldwide knowledge, research, and experience: ICT as a change agent for education. Scholarly Journal of Education, 2(4), 38-45.
 
34.
Ocak, M. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56(3), 689-699.
 
35.
Pedron, N. A., & Evans, B. (1990). Modifying Classroom Teachers’ Acceptance of the Consulting Teacher Model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1(2), 189-200.
 
36.
Prasolova-Førland, E., & Divitini, M. (2002, September). Supporting learning communities with collaborative virtual environments: Different spatial metaphors. Second IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2002) Kazan, Russia. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.o....
 
37.
Redecker, C., & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment—Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79-96.
 
38.
Roberts. (1986). Differentiating in-service through teacher concerns about education for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(3), 107-109. doi:10.1177/001698628603000302.
 
39.
Sarkar, S. (2012). The role of information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education for the 21st century. Science, 1(1), 30-41.
 
40.
Stone, D., & Zheng, G. (2014). Learning Management Systems in a Changing Environment. book: Handbook of Research on. In V. C. Wang, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Education and Technology in a Changing Society (756-767). United States: Information Science Reference.
 
41.
Sulisworo, D. (2012). Enabling ICT and knowledge management to enhance competitiveness of higher education institutions. International journal of Education, 4(1), 112.
 
42.
Sultana, N. (2015). Application of Concerned Based Adoption Model (CBAM) for Launching the Information Technology Based Teacher Education Programme at AIOU. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 4(3), 153-166.
 
43.
Thanuskodi, S. (2011). Usage of electronic resources at Dr TPM Library, Madurai Kamaraj University: a case study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 31(6), 437-445.
 
44.
Untiedt, J. S. H. (2014). Health professional educators’ needs regarding strategies in the implementation of a learning management system (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2263/419....
 
45.
Veletsianos, G. (2012). Higher education scholars’ participation and practices on Twitter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 336-349.
 
46.
Voss, B. D. (2013). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): A primer for university and college board members. Retrieved from AGB Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges Website. Retrieved from https://www.agb.org/reports/20....
 
47.
Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428-438.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215