RESEARCH PAPER
Further Investigation into the Quality of Teachers’ Noticing Expertise: A Proposed Framework for Evaluating Teachers’ Models of Students’ Mathematical Thinking
Mi Yeon Lee 1  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Mi Yeon Lee   

Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
Publish date: 2018-06-09
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(11):em1570
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Because teachers cannot directly access the processes by which students construct their mathematical knowledge, Teacher Noticing, an activity that involves observing students’ work, interpreting students’ mathematical thinking about a task based on their remarks or actions, and responding to their thinking, is important to grasp students’ mathematical understanding. A possible way for teachers to develop noticing expertise is to engage in a situation focused on student thinking such as clinical interviews. However, noticing students’ thinking productively through clinical interviews remains a challenge, especially for pre-service teachers, not only because it requires a broad range of knowledge but also because of the absence of a framework to inform and evaluate the process. This paper addresses the development of such a framework for evaluating the quality of pre-service teachers’ noticing expertise in a context where students’ thinking is emphasized by removing normal classroom interruptions. It then demonstrates how the framework can be used for this purpose through three empirical examples of pre-service teachers who engaged in an intervention that involved conducting clinical interviews and analyzing students’ mathematical thinking by watching video-recordings of their clinical interviews.
 
REFERENCES (51)
1.
Ainley, J., & Luntley, M. (2007). The role of attention in expert classroom practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857....
 
2.
Amador, J. (2016). Professional noticing practices of notice mathematics teacher educators. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
3.
Ball, D. L. (1991). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about subject matter? In M. Kennedy (Ed.) Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 63-83). New York: Teachers College Press.
 
4.
Bartell, T. G., Webel, C., Bowen, B., & Dyson, N. (2013). Prospective teacher learning: recognizing evidence of conceptual understanding. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857....
 
5.
Boaler, J., & Humphries, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school video cases to support teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Macmillan.
 
6.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of students’ problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(5), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.2307/749173.
 
7.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: an experimental study. American Educational Research Journal 26(4), 499-531. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283....
 
8.
Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/748576.
 
9.
Colestock. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2009). Teachers' sense making strategies while watching video of mathematics instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17, 7-29.
 
10.
Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 4, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.2307/749916.
 
11.
Dreher, A., & Kuntze S. (2015). Teachers’ professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
12.
Ellis, A. B. (2011). Generalizing-promoting actions: How classroom collaborations can support students’ mathematical generalizations. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 42(4), 308-345. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresem....
 
13.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 403-434. https://doi.org/10.2307/749875.
 
14.
Fernandes, A. (2012). Mathematics preservice teachers learning about English Language Learners through task-based interviews and noticing. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(1), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathte....
 
15.
Fernandez, C., Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2012). Learning to notice students’ mathematical thinking through on-line discussions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 747-759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
16.
Ginsburg, H. P. (1989). Children’s arithmetic: How they learn it and how you teach it (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: ProEd.
 
17.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
 
18.
Hackenberg, A. (2005). A model of mathematical learning and caring relations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), 45-51.
 
19.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283....
 
20.
Iterative Model Building Project [IMB]. (2010). M201 Elementary Field Experience Manual (Fall 2010 edition). Indiana University. Funding Agency: NSF Program Discovery Research K-12 (Grant #073214).
 
21.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.
 
22.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. A., & Schappelle, B. P. (2011). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children’s understandings. In M. G. Sherin, V. R., Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 97–116). New York: Routledge.
 
23.
Kersting, N. (2008). Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers' knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 845-861. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316....
 
24.
Lampert, M. & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
 
25.
Leatham, K. R., Peterson, B. E., Stockero, S., & Van Zoest, L. R. (2015). Conceptualizing mathematically significant pedagogical opportunities build on student thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 88-124. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresem....
 
26.
Lee, M. Y. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ ability to understand students’ mathematical thinking: The iterative model building field experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.
 
27.
Lee, M. Y., & Choi, B. (2017). Mathematical teacher noticing: The key to learning from Lesson Study. In E.O. Schack, Wilhelm, J., & Fisher, M. H. (Eds.) Teacher Noticing: Bridging and Broadening Perspectives, Contexts, and Frameworks (pp. 121-140), New York, Philadelphia: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
28.
Lee, M. Y., & Cross Francis, D. (2017). Investigating the relationship among elementary teachers’ perception about the use of students’ thinking, their professional noticing skills and their teaching practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
29.
Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York: Routledge.
 
30.
Miller, K. F. (2011). Situation awareness in teaching: What educators can learn from video-based research in other fields. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 51-65). New York: Routledge.
 
31.
Norton, A. H., & McCloskey, A. (2008). Teaching experiments and professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857....
 
32.
Norton, A. H., McCloskey, A., & Hudson, R. A. (2011). Prediction assessments: Using video-based predictions to assess prospective teachers’ knowledge of students’ mathematical thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14 (4), 305-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857....
 
33.
Olive, J. (2001). Children’s number sequences: An explanation of Steffe’s constructs and an extrapolation to rational numbers of arithmetic. The Mathematics Educator, 11(1), 4-9.
 
34.
Philipp, R. A., Ambrose, R., Lamb, L. C., Sowder, J. T., Schappelle, B. P., Sowder, L., ...Chauvot, J. (2007). Effects of early field experiences on the mathematical content knowledge and beliefs of prospective elementary school teachers: An experimental study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 438-476.
 
35.
Roller, S. A. (2016). What they notice in video: a study of prospective secondary mathematics teachers learning to teach. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(5), 477-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857....
 
36.
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. NY: Routledge.
 
37.
Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J. N., Eisenhardt, S., Tassell, J., & Yoder, M. (2013). Prospective elementary school teachers’ professional noticing of children’s early numeracy. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857....
 
38.
Schack, E. O., Wilhelm, J., & Fisher, M. H. (2017). Teacher Noticing: Bridging and Broadening Perspectives, Contexts, and Frameworks. New York, Philadelphia: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
39.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think. New York: Routledge.
 
40.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). Noticing matters. A lot. Now what? In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 223–238). New York: Routledge.
 
41.
Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 1-13). New York: Routledge.
 
42.
Sherin, M.G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
 
43.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
44.
Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2007). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857....
 
45.
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
46.
Steffe, L. P., & Wiegel, H. G. (1996). On the nature of a model of mathematical learning. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 477-498). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
47.
Steffe, L. P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983). Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory, and application. New York: Praeger.
 
48.
United States Math Recovery Council (2005, July) Math recovery overview. http://www.saine.com/mathrecov....
 
49.
van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M.G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.) Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134-151). Routledge: New York.
 
50.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 3-15). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
51.
Weiland, I., Hudson, R., & Amador, J. (2014). Preservice formative assessment interviews: The development of competent questioning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215