Historical and Biographical Approaches towards Teachers Training in Learning Physics Using Moodle LMS
More details
Hide details
Department of Physics, Kazan Federal University, Yelabuga, RUSSIA
Publish date: 2018-12-28
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(3):em1669
This article describes the possibilities for applying the historical and biographical approaches during the blended physics courses taught by using the original electronic training courses. This article provides the original e-learning modules that were applied during the Pedagogical Education course at the Kazan Federal University in 2016-2017 and 2017-2018. The training process was based on several different thematic blocks. Survey was conducted after the success testing. This survey has revealed that the historical and biographical approaches to teaching physics by means of the MOODLE LMS allow the teachers to increase the interest not only to this course, but also to the history of its development. In percentage terms, 39.7% of students have noted an increased level of motivation for independent activity. The original online courses will come in handy to design new physics curricula for online teaching and learning in other countries.
1. Alejandro, C. (2017). Tensions and challenges in the use of the biographical method. Retrieved from
2. Benta, D., Bologa, G., & Dzitac, I. (2014). E-learning platforms in higher education, Case study. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 1170-1176.
3. Cerezo, R., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Paule-Ruiz, M. P., & Núñez, J. C. (2016). Students’ LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers & Education, 96, 42-54.
4. Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Apitzsch, U. (Eds.) (2004). Biographical methods and professional practice: An international perspective. Policy Press.
5. Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (Eds.). (2000). The turn to biographical methods in social science: Comparative issues and examples. Psychology Press.
6. Chen, Z., & Sonawane, S. (2015). The new concept definition and analysis of biographical researching method. Scholarly Research Journal’s, 3(19), 352-359.
7. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.
8. Colace, F., Santo, M. D., & Vento, M. (2002). Evaluating on-line learning platforms: a case study. Paper presented at the 36th Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences. Big Island, Hawaii.
9. Cunha, M. P., Lewis, M., Rego, A., & Smith, W. K. (2017). Biographical methods in leadership research. Handbook of Methods in Leadership Research, 372.
10. Deng, T., & Bao, C. (2005). A Renewedly Understanding and Constructing of Teachers’ Culture: Commentary on Andey Hargreaves’s Perspective of Teachers’ Culture. Studies in Foreign Education, 8, 002.
11. Drigas, A., & Kontopoulou, M. T. L. (2016). ICTs based Physics Learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 6(3), 53-9.
12. Essel, D. D., & Wilson, O. A. (2017). Factors Affecting University Students’ Use of Moodle: An Empirical Study Based on TAM. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 13(1), 14-26.
13. Gay-Voronskaya, А. (2015). Biographic Method and its Heuristic Potential in Sociological Research. Retrieved from
14. Germano, J. S. E., Pinheiro, D. M., Brunelli, D. D., & Murakami, G. (2012). Simulation Programs can the Teacher Assist in a Classroom? A Case Study of the Interactive Physics Program used in Mechanical Oscillations. Journal of Physics Teaching, 31.
15. Green, J. L., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. B. (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of complementary methods in education research. Routledge.
16. Grober, S., Eckert, B., & Jodl, H. J. (2013). A New Medium for Physics Teaching: Results of a Worldwide Study of Remotely Controlled Laboratories (RCLs). European Journal of Physics, 35(1), 018001.
17. Jones, R. A., & Bogle, S. A. (2017). An Investigation of the Use of Facebook Groups as a Learning Management System to Improve Undergraduate Performance. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science.
18. Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 7.
19. Kohnle, A., Baily, C., Hooley, C., & Torrance, B. (2013). Optimization of simulations and activities for a new introductory quantum mechanics curriculum. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1307.1483.
20. Krasnova, L.A., & Shurygin, V.Y. (2017). Development of teachers’ information competency in higher education institution. Astra Salvensis, 5(10), 307.
21. Kubiatko, M., & Vaculová, I. (2011). Project-based learning: characteristic and the experiences with application in the science subjects. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 3(1), 65-74.
22. Limongelli, C., Sciarrone, F., & Vaste, G. (2011). Personalized e-learning in Moodle: the Moodle LS System. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 7(1), 49-58.
23. Linn, M. C. (2013). Internet environments for science education. Routledge.
24. Lópes-De-Ipiña, D., García-Zubia, J., & Orduña, P. (2006). Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing. IEEE, 123.
25. Martín-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education, 52(1), 35-44.
26. McCollough, C., & Ramirez, O. (2012). Cultivating culture: Preparing future teachers for diversity through family science learning events. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 443-451.
27. Shurygin, V. Y., & Krasnova, L. A. (2016). Electronic Learning Courses as a Means to Activate Students' Independent Work in Studying Physics. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(8), 1743-1751.