RESEARCH PAPER
Identification and Evaluation for Key Factors of Innovative Education in Universities Based on Grey Relational Model
Jun Xu 1  
,  
Teng-Fei Ren 2
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Business school, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, CHINA
2
School of Business Administration, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, CHINA
3
School of Geographical Mapping and Urban-Rural Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, CHINA
Online publish date: 2017-11-25
Publish date: 2017-11-25
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):8313–8321
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The development of innovative education in universities is influenced by many factors inside and outside the system. It is important to identify the key factors of innovative education in universities, and it is helpful to promote the practice of innovative education and the development of entrepreneurship education. This paper takes Jiangsu Province as an example to study innovative education in universities. Based on research ideas of data envelopment analysis, fifteen factors from two angles of input and output are designed. According to the relevant statistics of Jiangsu Province from 2006 to 2015, the grey relational model is used to analyze the factors that affect the development level of the innovative education in universities, and the key factors are identified and evaluated. Based on quantitative results, countermeasures are put forward from the aspects of educational concept, management system, teaching practice and so on.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2016). An innovative education model to realize ideal education system. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 3(3), 2464-2469.
 
2.
Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12-30.
 
3.
Brenna, B. (2016). Book review: Inspiration and innovation in teaching and teacher education. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 13(2), 82-85.
 
4.
Castro, G. M. (2015). Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 143-146.
 
5.
Cheng, C. C., Yang, C., & Sheu, C. (2016). Effects of open innovation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities on radical innovation: An empirical study. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, 41, 79-91.
 
6.
Chhokar, K. B. (2010). Higher education and curriculum innovation for sustainable development in India. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(2), 141-152.
 
7.
Chou, C., (2017). An Analysis of the 3D Video and Interactive Response Approach Effects on the Science Remedial Teaching for Fourth Grade Underachieving Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(4), 1059-1073.
 
8.
Clothey, R. A. (2011). Educating global citizens in colleges and universities: challenges and opportunities (review). Review of Higher Education, 34(3), 508-510.
 
9.
Cook, J. A., Edwards, S. V., Lacey, E. A., & Guralnick, R. P. (2014). Natural history collections as emerging resources for innovative education. Bioscience, 64(8), 725-734.
 
10.
Du, J., Leten, B., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 828-840.
 
11.
Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2016). The relationship between knowledge search strategies and absorptive capacity: A deeper look. Technovation, 54, 48-61.
 
12.
Francis, C. A., Jordan, N., Porter, P., & Breland, T. A. (2011). Innovative education in agroecology: experiential learning for a sustainable agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(1-2), 226-237.
 
13.
Hamada, M., & Hassan, M. (2017). An Interactive Learning Environment for Information and Communication Theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 35-59.
 
14.
Heinis, T. B., Goller, I., & Meboldt, M. (2016). Multilevel design education for innovation competencies. ScienceDirect, 50, 759-764.
 
15.
Ho, C. T. (2006). Measuring bank operations performance: an approach based on Grey Relation Analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(4), 337-349.
 
16.
Hofman, R. H., Boom, J. De., Meeuwisse, M., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2013). Educational innovation, quality, and effects: An exploration of innovations and their effects in secondary education. Educational Policy, 27(6), 843-866.
 
17.
Hsiao, S., Lin, H., & Ko, Y. (2017). Application of Grey Relational Analysis to Decision-Making during Product Development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2581-2600.
 
18.
Kaufman, N. J., & Scott, C. (2016). Innovation in higher education: lessons learned from creating a faculty fellowship program. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, 44, 97-106.
 
19.
Kim, D. Y., Kumar, V., & Kumar, U. (2012). Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 295-315.
 
20.
Klement, M. (2017). Models of integration of virtualization in education: Virtualization technology and possibilities of its use in education. Computers & Education, 105, 31-43.
 
21.
Lašáková, A., Bajzíková, L., & Dedze, I. (2017). Barriers and drivers of innovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across ten European universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 55, 69-79.
 
22.
Lee, C. I. (2017). An Appropriate Prompts System Based on the Polya Method for Mathematical Problem-Solving. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 893-910.
 
23.
Malekpoor, H., Chalvatzis, K., Mishra, N., & Mehlawat, M. K. (2017). Integrated grey relational analysis and multi objective grey linear programming for sustainable electricity generation planning. Annals of Operations Research, 6(8), 1-29.
 
24.
Nazarov, Z., & Akhmedjonov, A. (2013). Education, on-the-job training, and innovation in transition economies. Eastern European Economics, 50(6), 28-56.
 
25.
Roberts, K., & Owen, S. (2012). Innovative education: a review of the literature. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 8(3), 207-217.
 
26.
Samvedi, A., Jain, V., & Chan, F. T. (2012). An integrated approach for machine tool selection using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 50(12), 3211-3221.
 
27.
Tsou, M. H. (2010). Multidisciplinary cooperation in GIS education: a case study of US colleges and universities. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(4), 493-509.
 
28.
Vorontsov, A., & Vorontsova, E. (2015). Innovative education in Russia: the basic tendencies analysis. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214(12), 1147-1155.
 
29.
Wang, P., Meng, P., Zhai, J. Y., & Zhu, Z. Q. (2013). A hybrid method using experiment design and grey relational analysis for multiple criteria decision making problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 53(9), 100-107.
 
30.
Yueh, H. P., Chen, T. L., Chiu, L. A., Lee, S. L., & Wang, A. B. (2012). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness of a nationwide innovative education program on image display technology. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(3), 365–369.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215