Integration of Project Activity to Enhance the Scientific Process Skill and Self-Efficacy in Zoology of Vertebrate Teaching and Learning
Diana Hernawati 1, 2  
Mohamad Amin 3,  
Sri Indriwati 3,  
More details
Hide details
Postgraduate Doctoral Student of Biology Study Program, State University of Negeri Malang, INDONESIA
Study Program of Biology Education, FKIP, Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya, INDONESIA
Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, State University of Negeri Malang, INDONESIA
Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, JAPAN
Online publish date: 2018-04-14
Publish date: 2018-04-14
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(6):2475–2485
This study is a quantitative research conducted to analyze the integration of project activity to increase the scientific process skill and self-efficacy. While uncovering the effect of each indicator of every predictor, a descriptive qualitative analysis has been done. Respondents in this research were biology students in teacher. The sample of 30 respondents were taken by random sampling technique. Research instruments were in the form of scientific process skill test and self-efficacy inventory. The hypothesis was tested using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Integration of project activity has significant effect towards scientific skill process at 0.038 with F value of 4.524 and also have a significant effect for self effication at 0.018 with F value of 0.018. Based on results analysis, it is concluded that there was an effect of project activity integration in Zoology of Vertebrate teaching and learning on pre-service teachers’ scientific process skill and self-efficacy, with significance level of 0.05.
1. Akgün, A., Tokur, F., & Duruk, U. (2016). Associating conceptions in science teaching with daily Water chemistry and water treatment. Adiyaman University Journal of Educational Science, 6(1), 161-178.
2. Al-Amoush, A.S., Markic, S., Abu-Hola, I. & Eilks, I. (2011). Jordanian prospective and experienced chemistry teachers’ beliefs about teaching, learning and their potential role for educational reform, Science Education International, 22(3), 185-201.
3. Aljaafreh, I. J. A. R. (2013). The effect of using the directed inquiry strategy on the development of critical thinking skills and achievement in physics of the tenth-grade students in Southern Mazar. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(27), 191-197.
4. Al-rabaani, A. (2014). The acquisition of science process skills by Omani’s pre-service social studies’ teachers. European Journal of Educational Studies, 6(1), 13-19.
5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H Freeman and Company.
6. Bédard, D., Lison, C., Dalle, D., Côté, D., & Boutin, N. (2012). Problem-based and Project-based Learning in Engineering and Medicine: Determinants of Students’ Engagement and Persistance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2).
7. Bilgin, I., Karakuyu, Y., & Ay, Y. (2015). The effects of project based learning on undergraduate students’ achievement and self-efficacy beliefs towards science teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(3), 469-477.
8. Calik, M. (2013). Effect of technology-embedded scientific inquiry on senior science student teachers’ self-efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 223-232.
9. Campbell, T., Zhang, D., & Neilson, D. (2011). Model based inquiry in the high school physics classroom: an exploratory study of implementation and outcomes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 258–269.
10. Can, H. (2015). Sources of Teaching Efficacy Beliefs in Preservice Science Teachers. İlköğretim Online, 14(3).
11. Chabalengula, V. M., Mumba, F., & Mbewe, S. (2012). How pre-service teachers’ understand and perform science process skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(3), 167-176.
12. Chen, P., Hernandez, A., & Dong, J. (2015). Impact of collaborative project-based learning on self-efficacy of urban minority students in engineering. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 11, 26-39.
13. Chiang, C. L., & Lee, H. (2016). The effect of project-based learning on learning motivation and problem-solving ability of vocational high school students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709-712.
14. Cooper, L. A., & Kotys-Schwartz, D. A. (2013). Designing the Design Experience – Identifying Factors of Student Motivation in Project-Based Learning and Project-Based ServiceLearning. The ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
15. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitatice and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.
16. Demir, T. (2013). Project-based learning approach in Turkish teaching lessons, Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 1(1), 53-76.
17. Duran, M., & Dökme, İ. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(12).
18. Duran, M., Işik, H., Mihladiz, G., & Özdemir, O. (2011). The Relationship between the Pre-Service Science Teachers’ scientific Process Skills and Learning Styles. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES), Dokuz Eylul University Institute, Izmir, Turkey.
19. Ekici, G., Fettahlıoğlu, P., & Çıbık, A. S. (2012). Biology self-efficacy beliefs of the students studying in the department of biology and department of biology teaching. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1).
20. English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem-and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary journal of problem-based learning, 7(2), 6.
21. Erkol, S., & Ugulu, I. (2014). Examining Biology Teachers Candidates’ Scientific Process Skill Levels and Comparing These Levels In Terms Of Various Variables. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4742-4747.
22. Farsakoglu, O. F., Sahin, C., & Karsli, F. (2012). Comparing science process skills of prospective science teachers: A cross-sectional study. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(1).
23. Feyzioglu, B., Demirdag, B., Akyildiz, M., & Altun, E. (2012). Developing a Science Process Skills Test for Secondary Students: Validity and Reliability Study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 1899-1906.
24. Flores, I. M. (2015). Developing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy through field-based science teaching practice with elementary students. Research in Higher Education Journal, 27, 1.
25. Grant, M. M. (2012). Getting a grip on project-based learning: theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian, 5(1), 1-3.
26. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2004). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Sixth edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.
27. Habok, A., & Nagy, J. (2016). In-service teachers’ perceptions of project-based learning SpringerPlus.
28. Halim, L. E., & Meerah, T. S. (2012). Perception, conceptual knowledge and competency level of integrated science process skill towards planning a professional enhancement programme. Sains Malaysiana, 41, 921-930.
29. Hung, C. M., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, I. (2012). A Project based Digital Storytelling Approach for Improving Students’ Learning Motivation, Problem-Solving Competence and Learning Achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (4), 368–379.
30. Jack, G. U. (2013). The influence of identified student and school variables on students’ science process skills acquisition. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(5), 16-22.
31. Kanbay, Y., Aslan, Ö., Işık, E., & Kılıç, N. (2013). Problem solving and critical thinking skills of undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 3(3), 244-251.
32. Karsli, F., & Ayas, A. (2014). Developing a laboratory activity by using 5E learning model on student learning of factors affecting the reaction rate and improving scientific process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 663-668.
33. Kibirige, I., & Hodi, T. (2013). Learners’ performance in physical sciences using laboratory investigation.. International Journal of Education Science, 5(4), 425-432.
34. Krause, M., Pietzner, V., Dori, Y. J., & Eilks, I. (2017). Differences and Developments in Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Prospective Chemistry Teachers Concerning the Use of ICT in Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4405-4417.
35. Lattimer, H., & Riordan, R. (2011). Project-based learning engages students in meaningful work: Students at High Tech Middle engage in project-based learning. Middle School Journal, 43(2), 18-23.
36. Lee, S. W.-Y., Lai, Y.-C., Yu, H.-T. A., & Lin, Y.-T. K., (2012). Impact of biology laboratory courses on students’ science performance and views about laboratory courses in general: Innovative measurements and analyses. Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 173-179.
37. Louis, R. A., & Mistele, J. M. (2012). Differences in scores and self-efficacy by student gender in mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1163–1190.
38. Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez‐Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self‐efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80-89.
39. Mayer, R. (2013). How engineers learn: a study of problem-based learning in the engineering classroom and implications for course design (Graduate Theses and Dissertations). Paper 13202, Iowa State University.
40. Mauer, R., Neergaard, H., & Linstad, A. K. (2017). Self-efficacy: Conditioning the entrepreneurial mindset. In Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind (pp. 293-317). Springer, Cham.
41. Mertler, C. A., & Reinhart, R. V. (2016). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. Taylor & Francis.
42. Ongowo, R. O., & Indoshi, F. C. (2013). Science process skills in the Kenya certificate of secondary education biology practical examinations. Creative Education, 4(11), 713.
43. Osuala, R. C., & Onwuagboke, B. B. C., (2014). The Place of information and communication in students’ cognitive assessment in imo state tertiary institutions. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(11), 177-188.
44. Opateye, J. A. (2012). Developing and assessing science and technology process skills in Nigerian universal basic education environment. Journal of Education and Society Research, 2, 34-42.
45. Owolabi, T. & Oginni, I., (2012). Improvisation of science equipment in Nigerian schools. Universal Journal of Education and General Studies, 1(3), 44-48.
46. Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292.
47. Özyurt, Ö. (2015). Examining the Critical Thinking Dispositions and the Problem Solving Skills of Computer Engineering Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2).
48. Pekbay, C., & Kaptan, F., (2014). Improvement of preservice science teachers’ awareness on the effectiveness of laboratory method in science education: A qualitative study. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 2, 1-11.
49. Peters, M. L. (2013). Examining the relationships among classroom climate, self-efficacy, and achievement in undergraduate mathematics: A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 459–480.
50. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 138(2), 353.
51. Saad, R., & BouJaoude, S., (2012). The relationship between teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about science and ınquiry and their classroom practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(2), 113-128.
52. Sababha, B. H., Alqudah, Y. A., Abualbasal, A., & AlQaralleh, E. A. (2016). Project-based learning to enhance teaching embedded systems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2575-2585.
53. See, Y. G., & Rashid, A. M. (2015). The effect of project based learning on level of content knowledge of pre-vocational subject. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6 S4), 369.
54. Smolleck, L. A., & Mongan, A. M. (2011). Changes in preservice teachers’ self-efficacy: From science methods to student teaching. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 133-145.
55. Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2012). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Pearson Higher Ed.
56. Sumarni, W., Wardani, S., Sudarmin, S., & Gupitasari, D. N. (2016). Project based learning (pbl) to improve psychomotoric skills: a classroom action research. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 157-163.
57. Tafa, B., (2012). Laboratory activities and students practical performance: The case of practical organic chemistry I course of Haramaya University. AJCE, 2(3), 47-76.
58. Tantrarungroj, P., & Suwannatthachote, P. (2012). Enhancing pre-service teacher’s self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge in designing digital media with self-regulated learning instructional support in online project-based learning. Creative Education, 3, 77-81. Retrieved from
59. Tiantong, M., & Siksen, S., (2013). The Online Project Based Learning Model Based on Student’s Multiple Intelligence. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(7), 204-211.
60. Uitto, A. (2014). Interest, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs explaining upper-secondary school students’ orientation towards biology-related careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1425-1444.
61. Whatley, J. (2012). Evaluation of a Team Project Based Learning Module for Developing Employability Skills. Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 75-92.
62. Zeidan, A. H., & Jayosi, M. R. (2015). Science Process Skills and Attitudes toward Science among Palestinian Secondary School Students. World journal of Education, 5(1), 13-24.
63. Zhao, N., & Wardeska, J. G. (2011). Mini-journal inquiry laboratory: A case study in a general chemistry kinetics experiment. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(4), 452-456.