RESEARCH PAPER
Integration of Science Disciplinary Core Ideas and Environmental Themes through Constructivist Teaching Practices
Dorothy Holley 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
North Carolina State University, USA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Dorothy Holley   

North Carolina State University, USA
Online publication date: 2020-02-02
Publication date: 2020-02-02
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2020;16(5):em1838
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
A descriptive, mixed methods study investigated learning outcomes and processes of integrating environmental education (EE) and science education (SE). Specifically, this study examined the impact of EE-based constructivist science teaching approach on students’ science achievement scores, environmental self-efficacy, course completion rate, and perceptions of their learning experiences. Participants of the study (N=46) included students in a Physical Science course at one public high school in a southeastern state of the United States. Data sources included the students’ final exam scores, standardized unit test scores, self-efficacy measurements, course completion data, and student written reflections. Data analysis indicated that students with an EE-based constructivist science teaching approach (N=23) performed higher on science achievement tests and developed statistically higher environmental self-efficacy than those in a traditional teaching classroom (N=23). More students passed the final exam (96%) and the mean final exam score was four points higher (82) in EE-based constructivist teaching approach classes. Students who were in the EE-based constructivist science teaching approach classroom tended to perceive their learning experiences in more positive ways.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Editor: Dr. Wan NG
 
REFERENCES (52)
1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
 
2.
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., Roth, N. W., & Holthuis, N. (2018). Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/009589....
 
3.
Austin, B., & Schmidt, N. (2010). Pedagogy, Environmental; Education, and Context: Promoting Knowledge Through Concept Mapping. In A. M. Bodzin, B. S. Klein & S. Weaver (Eds.), The Inclusion of Environmental Education in Science Teacher Education. (pp. 225-236). Dordrecht; New York: Springer. Retrieved from http://www2.lib.ncsu.edu/catal....
 
4.
Banet, E., & Ayuso, G. E. (2003). Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 373-407.
 
5.
Baviskar, S. N., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist-teaching method articles. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 541-550.
 
6.
Bodzin, A., Klein, B. S., & Weaver, S. (2010). The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education. Springer Science & Business Media.
 
7.
Banilower, E., Cohen, K., Pasley, J., & Weiss, I. (2010). Effective science instruction: What does research tell us? Second edition. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
 
8.
Burrowes, P. A. (2003). A student-centered approach to teaching general biology that really works: Lord’s constructivist model put to a test. The American Biology Teacher, 65(7), 491-502.
 
9.
Bybee, R. W. (2014). NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972....
 
10.
Choi, J., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0230....
 
11.
Cobern, W. W., Gibson, A. T., & Underwood, S. A. (1995). Valuing science literacy. The Science Teacher, 62(9), 28-31.
 
12.
Cooper, J. L. (1995). Cooperative learning and critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 7. Retrieved from https://proxying.lib.ncsu.edu/....
 
13.
Cooper, L. Z. (2013). Student reflections on an LIS internship from a service learning perspective supporting multiple learning theories. Retrieved from https://proxying.lib.ncsu.edu/....
 
14.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
 
15.
Cuevas, H., & Fiore, S. (2014). Enhancing learning outcomes in computer-based training via self-generated elaboration. Instructional Science, 42(6), 839-859.
 
16.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
 
17.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New Your, NY: Kappa Delta Pi. English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
 
18.
Glaze, A. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st Century: Challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsc....
 
19.
Greeno, J., & Engestrom, Y. (2014). Learning in activity. In K. Sawyer (Ed). The Cambridge Handbook of The Learning Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 128-147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
 
20.
Hogan, K. (2002). Pitfalls of community-based learning: How power dynamics limit adolescents’ trajectories of growth and participation. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 586. Retrieved from https://proxying.lib.ncsu.edu/....
 
21.
Hollweg, K. S., Taylor, J., Bybee, R. W., Marcinkowski, T. J., McBeth, W. C., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. Environmental Education. Washington, DC: NAAEE. http://www.naaee.net.
 
22.
Howard, M. (2015). Science fiction meets scientific inquiry: A task-technology fit/computer-based training framework and a meta-analysis of virtual reality applications for intervention, training, and therapy purposes – ProQuest Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.pr....
 
23.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
 
24.
Hurley, T. V. (2017). Experiential teaching increases medication calculation accuracy among baccalaureate nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(1), 34-36.
 
25.
Iamarino, D. L. (2014). The benefits of standards-based grading: A critical evaluation of modern grading practices. Current Issues in Education, 17(2). Retrieved from https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.....
 
26.
Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (Eds.). (2016). STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. New York, NY: Routledge.
 
27.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
 
28.
Lee, E. A., & Brown, M. J. (2018). Connecting inquiry and values in science education. Science & Education, 27(1-2), 63-79.
 
29.
Lieberman, G. A. & Hoody, L. L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrating context for learning. San Diego, CA.
 
30.
Lieberman, G. A. (2013). Education and the Environment: Creating Standards-Based Programs in Schools and Districts(SEER). Harvard Education Press. 8 Story Street First Floor, Cambridge, MA. http://www.seer.org/pages/eic.....
 
31.
Lord, T. R. (1999). A comparison between traditional and constructivist teaching in environmental science. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(3), 22-27.
 
32.
National Research Council. (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
 
33.
National Research Council. (NRC) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded Edition. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
 
34.
National Research Council. (NRC) (2005). How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. Committee on How People Learn, A Targeted Report for Teachers, M.S. Donovan and J.D. Bransford, Editors. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
 
35.
North American Association for Environmental Education. (NAAEE) (2009). Excellence in Environmental Education: Guidelines for Learning (K-12). Northern Illinois University: National Project for Excellence in Environmental Education.
 
36.
Österlind, K. (2005). Concept formation in environmental education: 14-year olds’ work on the intensified greenhouse effect and the depletion of the ozone layer. International Journal of Science Education, 27(8), 891-908.
 
37.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
 
38.
Plakitsi, K. (2010). Collective curriculum design as a tool for rethinking scientific literacy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(3), 577-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422....
 
39.
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014) Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp 545-558). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://proxying.lib.ncsu.edu/....
 
40.
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (pp. 1-9). Springer, Dordrecht.
 
41.
Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Bondell, H. D., Mertig, A. G., & Moore, S. E. (2013). Environmental, Institutional, and Demographic Predictors of Environmental Literacy among Middle School Children. PLoS ONE 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
42.
Szczytko, R., Stevenson, K., Peterson, M. N., Nietfeld, J., & Strnad, R. L. (2019). Development and validation of the environmental literacy instrument for adolescents. Environmental Education Research, 25(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/135046....
 
43.
Tretter, T. R., & Jones, M. G. (2003). Relationships between inquiry-based teaching and physical science standardized test scores. School Science and Mathematics, 103(7), 345-350.
 
44.
UNESCO, U. (1977). The Tbilisi declaration. In Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education (pp. 14-26).
 
45.
US News (2017, July 18). Clayton High School. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/educati....
 
46.
Volk, T. L., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1984). A national survey of curriculum needs as perceived by professional environmental educators. The Journal of Environmental Education, 16(1), 10-19.
 
47.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
 
48.
Wals, A. E., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344(6184), 583-584.
 
49.
Wang, H., Hong, Z., Liu, S., & Lin, H. (2018). The impact of socio-scientific issue discussions on student environmentalism. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1624. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
50.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131-175.
 
51.
Wilcox, J. (2011). Holding ourselves to a higher standard: Using standards-based grading in science as a means to improve teaching and learning. Iowa Science Teachers Journal, 38(3), 4-11.
 
52.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994) Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215