RESEARCH PAPER
Investigating Mathematics Learning Trajectories: A Comparative Analysis of Grades at Two Major Turning Points
 
More details
Hide details
1
OU, Reduit, MAURITIUS
2
La Tour Koenig, MAURITIUS
3
UoM, Reduit, MAURITIUS
Online publish date: 2018-01-10
Publish date: 2018-01-10
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(4):1263–1272
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
The number of students completing mathematics education at higher levels are in decreasing numbers, despite good grades at primary level. This research study sought to explore the mathematics learning trajectory by collecting Mathematics grades obtained by 1652 students at the end of primary and secondary schooling. Data analysis showed a moderate association between these grades. But those who performed well at the primary level did not necessarily study the subject at the same learning performance at higher levels. This research study unveiled that girls, in general, tend to maintain their learning performance better than boys at higher levels. It also revealed that some students experienced a positive turning point in their learning, and the overarching conclusions from students’ interviews included perceived usefulness of Mathematics education, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to boost the learning process and the need to overcome past hurdles. Finally, a model was developed to monitor learning progress achievement.
 
REFERENCES (22):
1. Appavoo, P., Soyjaudah, K. M., & Armoogum, V. (2013). Effects of Prior Learning on Mathematics Performance at Secondary Level. Paper presented at IEEE Africon proceedings of the International Conference, Mauritius. doi:10.1109/AFRCON.2013.6757693.
2. Barton, M., Heidema, C., & Jordan, D. (2002). Teaching Reading in Mathematics and Science. Educational Leadership, 60(3), 24-28.
3. Beskeni, R. D., Yousouf, M. I., Awang, M. M., & Ranjha, A. (2011). The effect of prior knowledge in understanding chemistry concepts by senior secondary school students. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 607-611.
4. Bessoondoyal, H. (2005). Gender and other factors impacting on Mathematics achievement at secondary level in Mauritius. Australia: Curtin University of Technology, Science and Mathematics Education Centre.
5. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University.
6. Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The Impact of Sequencing and Prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 15-24. doi:10.1007/BF02504794.
7. Clements, D. (2013). The Progress of Education Reform. Education Commission of the States, 14(5), 1-7. Retrieved from http://www.du.edu.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Dochy, F. J. R. C., & Segers, M. S. R. (1998). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of prior knowledge studies. University of Maastritch.
10. Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5), 113. doi:10.5688/aj7205113.
11. Howard, L., & Whitaker, M. (2011). Unsuccessful and successful Mathematics Learning: Developmental Students’ Perceptions, Journal of Development Education, 35(2), 2-16.
12. Kyttälä, M., & Björn, P. M. (2010). Prior mathematics achievement, cognitive appraisals and anxiety as predictors of Finnish students’ later mathematics performance and career orientation. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 30(4), 431-448. doi:10.1080/01443411003724491.
13. National Audit Office. (2008). Mathematics performance in primary schools: Getting the best results. Retrieved from http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0708/primary_school_maths.aspx.
14. National Numeracy (2017). Why is numeracy important? [Online]. Retrieved on September 2017 from https://www.nationalnumeracy.org.uk/why-numeracy-important.
15. Osman, M. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (1994). Effects of advance questioning and prior knowledge on science learning. Journal of Educational Research, 88(1), p.5. doi:10.1080/00220671.1994.9944829.
16. Roschelle, J. (1995). Learning in interactive environments: Prior Knowledge and New Experience. University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth.
17. Royal Society (2014). Vision for science and Mathematics education [Online]. Retrieved on 8 September 2015 from http://royalsociety.org/vision.
18. Strangman, N., Hall, T., & Meyer, A. (2004). Background knowledge with UDL. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved from http://aim.cast.org/learn/historyarchive/backgroundpapers/background_knowledge_udl.
19. Taber, K. S. (2001). The Mismatch between Assumed Prior Knowledge and the Learner’s Conceptions: A typology of learning impediments. Educational Studies, 27(2), 159-171. doi:10.1080/03055690120050392.
20. Thompson, R. A., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2003). Prior Knowledge and its relevance to student achievement in Introduction to Psychology. University of Nebraska, 30(2), 96-101.
21. Voderman, C., Budd, C., Dunne, R., Hart, M., & Porkess, R. (2011). A world-class mathematics education for all our young people. Retrieved from http://www.tsm-resources.com/pdf/VordermanMathsReport.
22. Wetzels, S. A. J., Kester, L., Merriënboer Van, J. J. G., & Broers, N. J. (2011). The influence of prior knowledge on the retrieval-directed function of note taking in prior knowledge activation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 274-291. doi:10.1348/000709910X517425.
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215