RESEARCH PAPER
Mobile Interactive Translation Teaching Model Based on “Internet +”
Fang Qiao 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Graduate School, Xi’an International Studies University, Shaanxi 710128, CHINA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Fang Qiao   

Graduate School, Xi’an International Studies University, Shaanxi 710128, China
Online publish date: 2017-10-03
Publish date: 2017-10-03
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(10):6705–6714
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, we have entered a new era of globalization and information. The new information technology featured by Internet and computer has permeated every sphere of our lives and affected our viewpoint of consuming and life-style. As for translation teaching, the traditional translation-teaching model cannot satisfy the needs of modern education. In China, the translation teaching based on Internet has become the norm. And more and more people have accepted the mobile learning model. Under such background, this study analyzes the features of mobile teaching and constructs a new model of mobile interactive translation teaching from the perspective of constructivism. The paper also preliminarily testified the new model by taking three different social interactive tools that are most popular in China as example, that is, WeChat, QQ, and Micro-blog. The result shows that this new model based on “Internet +” can improve translation teaching and learning.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Agrawal, D., Das, S., & Abbadi, A. E. (2011). Big data and cloud computing: current state and future opportunities. International Conference on Extending Database Technology, 65, 530-533. doi:10.1145/1951365.1951432.
 
2.
Al-Huneidi, A., & Schreurs, J. (2011). Constructivism Based Blended Learning in Higher Education. Information Systems, E-learning, and Knowledge Management Research. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 581-591p. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35879-1_74.
 
3.
Ally, M., & Tsinakos, A. (2014). Increasing access through mobile learning. Commonwealth of Learning & Athabasca University, 64(3), 225-227.
 
4.
Boticario, J. G., & Gaudioso, E. (2000). Towards a Personalized Web-Based Educational System. MICAI 2000: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1793, 729-740. doi:10.1007/10720076#page=743.
 
5.
Boticki, I., Baksa, J., Seow, P., & Looi, C. K. (2015). Usage of a mobile social learning platform with virtual badges in a primary school. Computers & Education, 86(C), 120-136. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.015.
 
6.
Denton, D. W. (2012). Enhancing instruction through constructivism, cooperative learning, and cloud computing. Techtrends, 56(4), 34-41. doi:10.1007%2Fs11528-012-0585-1?LI=true.
 
7.
Duţă, N., & Martínez-Rivera, O. (2015). Between theory and practice: the importance of ict in higher education as a tool for collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1466-1473. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.294.
 
8.
Dye, A., Solstad, B., & Kodingo, J. A. (2003). Mobile education-a glance at the future. http://dye.no/articles/a_glanc....
 
9.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. doi:10.1002/piq.21143.
 
10.
Gilakjani, A. P., Lai, M. L., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers’ use of technology and constructivism. International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science, 5(4), 49-63. doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2013.04.07.
 
11.
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: causal models, bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1085-108.
 
12.
Huang, Y., & Chiu, P. (2014). The effectiveness of a meaningful learning-based evaluation model for context-aware mobile learning. Brit. J. Educ. Techn. doi:10.1111/bjet.12147.
 
13.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). The nmc horizon report: 2013 k-12 edition. New Media Consortium. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fullt....
 
14.
Kiraly, D. C. (2001). A social constructivist approach to translator education: empowerment from theory to practice. St. Jerome Pub.
 
15.
Liu, Z. (2017). China’s strategy for the development of renewable energies. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1-5. doi:10.1080/15567249.2017.1336813.
 
16.
Luneeva, O. L., & Zakirova, V. G. (2017). Integration of Mathematical and Natural-Science Knowledge in School Students’ Project-Based Activity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2821-2840. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00720a.
 
17.
Moldovan, A. N., Ghergulescu, I., & Muntean, C. (2014). Learning assessment for different categories of educational multimedia clips in a mobile learning environment. Journal of Power Sources, 196(23), 9931-9938.
 
18.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. doi:10.1080/08923648909526659.
 
19.
Statistics, C. I. (2015). China internet network information center. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/.
 
20.
Wang, Z., Chen, C., Guo, B., Yu, Z., & Zhou, X. (2016). Internet plus in china. It Professional, 18(3), 5-8. doi:10.1109/MITP.2016.47.
 
21.
Yang, D., Tseng, Y., & Wang, T. (2017). A Comparison of Geometry Problems in Middle-Grade Mathematics Textbooks from Taiwan, Singapore, Finland, and the United States. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2841-2857. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00721a.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215