CC-BY 4.0

Research on the Differences of Ecological Efficiency of Low-carbon M&A among Enterprises under the Education of Ecological Civilization

Man-Wen Tian 1,  
Shu-Rong Yan 2  ,  
School of Business, Lishui University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
College of medicine and health, Lishui University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
School of Economics and Management, Shenyang ligong University, Shenyang, China
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 2017;13(8):5233–5245
Online publish date: 2017-08-16
Publish date: 2017-08-16
Environmental education has a substantial impact on the behavior and performance of mergers and acquisitions. Low-carbon M&A is a new mode of mergers and acquisitions under the education of ecological civilization. This paper first analyses the improvement of ecological efficiency of low-carbon M&A in different regions and industries in China, but there are significant differences in the improvement of environmental efficiency in different regions and industries. The higher efficiency industries are mainly distributed in the capital-intensive industries, followed by labor-intensive industries, while the resource intensive industries are the lowest. The cleaner production industries are significantly higher than the pollution intensive industries. The main reason is that there are significant industrial differences in environmental education, energy structure and low-carbon technology. Regional environmental efficiency is higher in the Yangtze River Delta, followed by the Pearl River Delta, the Circum-Bohai-Sea Region, the worst. The main reason is that there are regional differences in environmental education investment, resource endowment, government intervention, marketization level, environmental policy and ecological civilization education system. Increasing investment in environmental education is one of the key means of improving ecological performance.
Shu-Rong Yan   
College of medicine and health, Lishui University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
1. Chun-Ying, Z., & Hong-Qiang, Y. (2013). Industry Difference of Chinese Energy Consumption Efficiency and Energy Conservation Potential. Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University, (9), 84-93. doi:10.13781/j.cnki.1007-9556.2013.09.003.
2. Hongjuan, Y., & Binbin, G. (2010). The research of performance evaluation of low carbon supply chain based on DEA. Economic issues exploring, (9), 33. doi:1672-8561(2010)09-0473-03.
3. Lin, J.-W. (2017). A Cross-Grade Study Validating the Evolutionary Pathway of Student Mental Models in Electric Circuits. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3099-3137. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00707a.
4. Liu, Z. (2017). China’s strategy for the development of renewable energies. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1-5. doi:10.1080/15567249.2017.1336813.
5. Ma, Y., Gao, H., & Li, Z. (2012). Study on the evaluation performance of merger and acquisition based on model of DEA. Friends of Accounting, (2), 30-33. doi:1639-3658(2012)02-0867-05.
6. Ma, Z. (2010). Data envelopment analysis model and method. Beijing: Science Press, 21-31.
7. Manwen, T. (2009). A Comparative Study of M& A Efficiency Based on Different Economic Region and Different Industries. Finance and Sciences, (9), 73-81. doi:1000- 8306(2009) 08- 0073- 09.
8. Manwen, T. (2014). A new model of Low-Carbon M&A under the Background of Ecological Civilization. Enterprise Economy, (12), 11-15. doi:1006-5024 (2014) 12-0011-05.
9. Manwen, T. (2014). The Economic Efficiency of Enterprise Low-Carbon Mergers and Acquisitions: An Empirical Study from Ecological Civilization Construction Perspective. Journal of Lishui University, (4), 25-31. doi:2095-3801(2014)04-0025-07.
10. Peng, W. (2017). Research on Model of Student Engagement in Online Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2869-2882. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00723a.
11. Shujing, Y. (2011). Study on Capital Allocation Efficiency in a Low Carbon Economy Development Perspective. Research on Quantitative and technical economics, (4), 110-122. doi:10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2011.04.009.
12. WANG Keliang, YANG Baochen, YANG Li (2011). China’s Provincial Energy Efficiency Measurement based on DEA and Directional Distance Function, Chinese Journal of Management, (3), 456-463. doi:1672-884X(2011)03-0456-08.